Cargando…

Impact of preoperative factors on recovery of continence after artificial urinary sphincter implantation in postprostatectomy incontinence

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine the influence of preoperative factors on the recovery of continence after artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) implantation in postprostatectomy incontinence. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy-two patients who underwent AUS implantation between April...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shin, Dongho, Ahn, Joonho, Kwon, Hyeok Jae, Hur, Kyung Jae, Moon, Hyong Woo, Park, Yong Hyun, Cho, Hyuk Jin, Ha, U-syn, Hong, Sung-Hoo, Lee, Ji Youl, Kim, Sae Woong, Bae, Woong Jin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Asian Pacific Prostate Society 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8740127/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35059353
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prnil.2021.04.003
_version_ 1784629247086690304
author Shin, Dongho
Ahn, Joonho
Kwon, Hyeok Jae
Hur, Kyung Jae
Moon, Hyong Woo
Park, Yong Hyun
Cho, Hyuk Jin
Ha, U-syn
Hong, Sung-Hoo
Lee, Ji Youl
Kim, Sae Woong
Bae, Woong Jin
author_facet Shin, Dongho
Ahn, Joonho
Kwon, Hyeok Jae
Hur, Kyung Jae
Moon, Hyong Woo
Park, Yong Hyun
Cho, Hyuk Jin
Ha, U-syn
Hong, Sung-Hoo
Lee, Ji Youl
Kim, Sae Woong
Bae, Woong Jin
author_sort Shin, Dongho
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine the influence of preoperative factors on the recovery of continence after artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) implantation in postprostatectomy incontinence. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy-two patients who underwent AUS implantation between April 2006 and March 2020 were analyzed. The clinical features and preoperative urodynamic parameters were correlated with the postoperative continence rate using linear and logistic regression analysis. The recovery of continence was defined by the patient requiring no use of a protective urine pad during the 24 hours. RESULTS: Of the 72 patients, 57 (79.2%) recovered continence (dry group), while 15 (20.8%) were wearing more than 1 pad per day (wet group) on the last follow-up visit. In the clinical characteristics, only the interval between radical prostatectomy and AUS (in months) showed a statistically significant difference (35.4 ± 26.2 in the dry group, 22.7 ± 12.2 in the wet group, p = 0.009). Other preoperative clinical features such as the underlying disease, surgical methods, size of prostate, tumor stage, and radio nor hormonal therapy did not present statistically significant differences. Of the preoperative urodynamic parameters, only the abdominal leak point pressure (ALPP) showed statistical significance when related to surgical outcomes by 88.6 ± 33.6 in the dry group and 66.1 ± 29.6 in wet the group (P = 0.024). The number of patients for whom ALPP was higher than 80 cm H(2)O was 61.4% in the dry group and 20% in the wet group (95% confidence interval: 1.612-25.11). Other preoperative UDS features including detrusor underactivity, maximum urethral closure pressure, and others were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: The interval between RP and AUS, as well as the preoperative ALPP, can be possible predictive factors for the surgical outcomes of AUS implantation. In addition, an ALPP of >80 cm H(2)O has a high degree of predictability for success of AUS surgical outcomes in post-RP incontinence.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8740127
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Asian Pacific Prostate Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87401272022-01-19 Impact of preoperative factors on recovery of continence after artificial urinary sphincter implantation in postprostatectomy incontinence Shin, Dongho Ahn, Joonho Kwon, Hyeok Jae Hur, Kyung Jae Moon, Hyong Woo Park, Yong Hyun Cho, Hyuk Jin Ha, U-syn Hong, Sung-Hoo Lee, Ji Youl Kim, Sae Woong Bae, Woong Jin Prostate Int Research Article BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine the influence of preoperative factors on the recovery of continence after artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) implantation in postprostatectomy incontinence. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy-two patients who underwent AUS implantation between April 2006 and March 2020 were analyzed. The clinical features and preoperative urodynamic parameters were correlated with the postoperative continence rate using linear and logistic regression analysis. The recovery of continence was defined by the patient requiring no use of a protective urine pad during the 24 hours. RESULTS: Of the 72 patients, 57 (79.2%) recovered continence (dry group), while 15 (20.8%) were wearing more than 1 pad per day (wet group) on the last follow-up visit. In the clinical characteristics, only the interval between radical prostatectomy and AUS (in months) showed a statistically significant difference (35.4 ± 26.2 in the dry group, 22.7 ± 12.2 in the wet group, p = 0.009). Other preoperative clinical features such as the underlying disease, surgical methods, size of prostate, tumor stage, and radio nor hormonal therapy did not present statistically significant differences. Of the preoperative urodynamic parameters, only the abdominal leak point pressure (ALPP) showed statistical significance when related to surgical outcomes by 88.6 ± 33.6 in the dry group and 66.1 ± 29.6 in wet the group (P = 0.024). The number of patients for whom ALPP was higher than 80 cm H(2)O was 61.4% in the dry group and 20% in the wet group (95% confidence interval: 1.612-25.11). Other preoperative UDS features including detrusor underactivity, maximum urethral closure pressure, and others were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: The interval between RP and AUS, as well as the preoperative ALPP, can be possible predictive factors for the surgical outcomes of AUS implantation. In addition, an ALPP of >80 cm H(2)O has a high degree of predictability for success of AUS surgical outcomes in post-RP incontinence. Asian Pacific Prostate Society 2021-12 2021-05-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8740127/ /pubmed/35059353 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prnil.2021.04.003 Text en © 2021 Asian Pacific Prostate Society. Published by Elsevier B.V. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Research Article
Shin, Dongho
Ahn, Joonho
Kwon, Hyeok Jae
Hur, Kyung Jae
Moon, Hyong Woo
Park, Yong Hyun
Cho, Hyuk Jin
Ha, U-syn
Hong, Sung-Hoo
Lee, Ji Youl
Kim, Sae Woong
Bae, Woong Jin
Impact of preoperative factors on recovery of continence after artificial urinary sphincter implantation in postprostatectomy incontinence
title Impact of preoperative factors on recovery of continence after artificial urinary sphincter implantation in postprostatectomy incontinence
title_full Impact of preoperative factors on recovery of continence after artificial urinary sphincter implantation in postprostatectomy incontinence
title_fullStr Impact of preoperative factors on recovery of continence after artificial urinary sphincter implantation in postprostatectomy incontinence
title_full_unstemmed Impact of preoperative factors on recovery of continence after artificial urinary sphincter implantation in postprostatectomy incontinence
title_short Impact of preoperative factors on recovery of continence after artificial urinary sphincter implantation in postprostatectomy incontinence
title_sort impact of preoperative factors on recovery of continence after artificial urinary sphincter implantation in postprostatectomy incontinence
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8740127/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35059353
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prnil.2021.04.003
work_keys_str_mv AT shindongho impactofpreoperativefactorsonrecoveryofcontinenceafterartificialurinarysphincterimplantationinpostprostatectomyincontinence
AT ahnjoonho impactofpreoperativefactorsonrecoveryofcontinenceafterartificialurinarysphincterimplantationinpostprostatectomyincontinence
AT kwonhyeokjae impactofpreoperativefactorsonrecoveryofcontinenceafterartificialurinarysphincterimplantationinpostprostatectomyincontinence
AT hurkyungjae impactofpreoperativefactorsonrecoveryofcontinenceafterartificialurinarysphincterimplantationinpostprostatectomyincontinence
AT moonhyongwoo impactofpreoperativefactorsonrecoveryofcontinenceafterartificialurinarysphincterimplantationinpostprostatectomyincontinence
AT parkyonghyun impactofpreoperativefactorsonrecoveryofcontinenceafterartificialurinarysphincterimplantationinpostprostatectomyincontinence
AT chohyukjin impactofpreoperativefactorsonrecoveryofcontinenceafterartificialurinarysphincterimplantationinpostprostatectomyincontinence
AT hausyn impactofpreoperativefactorsonrecoveryofcontinenceafterartificialurinarysphincterimplantationinpostprostatectomyincontinence
AT hongsunghoo impactofpreoperativefactorsonrecoveryofcontinenceafterartificialurinarysphincterimplantationinpostprostatectomyincontinence
AT leejiyoul impactofpreoperativefactorsonrecoveryofcontinenceafterartificialurinarysphincterimplantationinpostprostatectomyincontinence
AT kimsaewoong impactofpreoperativefactorsonrecoveryofcontinenceafterartificialurinarysphincterimplantationinpostprostatectomyincontinence
AT baewoongjin impactofpreoperativefactorsonrecoveryofcontinenceafterartificialurinarysphincterimplantationinpostprostatectomyincontinence