Cargando…

Differences Between Female Singers With Phonotrauma and Vocally Healthy Matched Controls in Singing and Speaking Voice Use During 1 Week of Ambulatory Monitoring

PURPOSE: Previous ambulatory voice monitoring studies have included many singers and have combined speech and singing in the analyses. This study applied a singing classifier to the ambulatory recordings of singers with phonotrauma and healthy controls to determine if analyzing speech and singing se...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Toles, Laura E., Ortiz, Andrew J., Marks, Katherine L., Burns, James A., Hron, Tiffiny, Van Stan, Jarrad H., Mehta, Daryush D., Hillman, Robert E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8740583/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33472007
http://dx.doi.org/10.1044/2020_AJSLP-20-00227
_version_ 1784629340052389888
author Toles, Laura E.
Ortiz, Andrew J.
Marks, Katherine L.
Burns, James A.
Hron, Tiffiny
Van Stan, Jarrad H.
Mehta, Daryush D.
Hillman, Robert E.
author_facet Toles, Laura E.
Ortiz, Andrew J.
Marks, Katherine L.
Burns, James A.
Hron, Tiffiny
Van Stan, Jarrad H.
Mehta, Daryush D.
Hillman, Robert E.
author_sort Toles, Laura E.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Previous ambulatory voice monitoring studies have included many singers and have combined speech and singing in the analyses. This study applied a singing classifier to the ambulatory recordings of singers with phonotrauma and healthy controls to determine if analyzing speech and singing separately would reveal voice use differences that could provide new insights into the etiology and pathophysiology of phonotrauma in this at-risk population. METHOD: Forty-two female singers with phonotrauma (vocal fold nodules or polyps) and 42 healthy matched controls were monitored using an ambulatory voice monitor. Weeklong statistics (average, standard deviation, skewness, kurtosis) for sound pressure level (SPL), fundamental frequency, cepstral peak prominence, the magnitude ratio of the first two harmonics (H(1)–H(2) ), and three vocal dose measures were computed from the neck surface acceleration signal and separated into singing and speech using a singing classifier. RESULTS: Mixed analysis of variance models found expected differences between singing and speech in each voice parameter, except SPL kurtosis. SPL skewness, SPL kurtosis, and all H(1)–H(2) distributional parameters differentiated patients and controls when singing and speech were combined. Interaction effects were found in H(1)–H(2) kurtosis and all vocal dose measures. Patients had significantly higher vocal doses in speech compared to controls. CONCLUSIONS: Consistent with prior work, the pathophysiology of phonotrauma in singers is characterized by more abrupt/complete glottal closure (decreased mean and variation for H(1)–H(2) ) and increased laryngeal forces (negatively skewed SPL distribution) during phonation. Application of a singing classifier to weeklong data revealed that singers with phonotrauma spent more time speaking on a weekly basis, but not more time singing, compared to controls. Results are used as a basis for hypothesizing about the role of speaking voice in the etiology of phonotraumatic vocal hyperfunction in singers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8740583
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher American Speech-Language-Hearing Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87405832022-01-20 Differences Between Female Singers With Phonotrauma and Vocally Healthy Matched Controls in Singing and Speaking Voice Use During 1 Week of Ambulatory Monitoring Toles, Laura E. Ortiz, Andrew J. Marks, Katherine L. Burns, James A. Hron, Tiffiny Van Stan, Jarrad H. Mehta, Daryush D. Hillman, Robert E. Am J Speech Lang Pathol Research Articles PURPOSE: Previous ambulatory voice monitoring studies have included many singers and have combined speech and singing in the analyses. This study applied a singing classifier to the ambulatory recordings of singers with phonotrauma and healthy controls to determine if analyzing speech and singing separately would reveal voice use differences that could provide new insights into the etiology and pathophysiology of phonotrauma in this at-risk population. METHOD: Forty-two female singers with phonotrauma (vocal fold nodules or polyps) and 42 healthy matched controls were monitored using an ambulatory voice monitor. Weeklong statistics (average, standard deviation, skewness, kurtosis) for sound pressure level (SPL), fundamental frequency, cepstral peak prominence, the magnitude ratio of the first two harmonics (H(1)–H(2) ), and three vocal dose measures were computed from the neck surface acceleration signal and separated into singing and speech using a singing classifier. RESULTS: Mixed analysis of variance models found expected differences between singing and speech in each voice parameter, except SPL kurtosis. SPL skewness, SPL kurtosis, and all H(1)–H(2) distributional parameters differentiated patients and controls when singing and speech were combined. Interaction effects were found in H(1)–H(2) kurtosis and all vocal dose measures. Patients had significantly higher vocal doses in speech compared to controls. CONCLUSIONS: Consistent with prior work, the pathophysiology of phonotrauma in singers is characterized by more abrupt/complete glottal closure (decreased mean and variation for H(1)–H(2) ) and increased laryngeal forces (negatively skewed SPL distribution) during phonation. Application of a singing classifier to weeklong data revealed that singers with phonotrauma spent more time speaking on a weekly basis, but not more time singing, compared to controls. Results are used as a basis for hypothesizing about the role of speaking voice in the etiology of phonotraumatic vocal hyperfunction in singers. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association 2021-01 2021-01-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8740583/ /pubmed/33472007 http://dx.doi.org/10.1044/2020_AJSLP-20-00227 Text en Copyright © 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research Articles
Toles, Laura E.
Ortiz, Andrew J.
Marks, Katherine L.
Burns, James A.
Hron, Tiffiny
Van Stan, Jarrad H.
Mehta, Daryush D.
Hillman, Robert E.
Differences Between Female Singers With Phonotrauma and Vocally Healthy Matched Controls in Singing and Speaking Voice Use During 1 Week of Ambulatory Monitoring
title Differences Between Female Singers With Phonotrauma and Vocally Healthy Matched Controls in Singing and Speaking Voice Use During 1 Week of Ambulatory Monitoring
title_full Differences Between Female Singers With Phonotrauma and Vocally Healthy Matched Controls in Singing and Speaking Voice Use During 1 Week of Ambulatory Monitoring
title_fullStr Differences Between Female Singers With Phonotrauma and Vocally Healthy Matched Controls in Singing and Speaking Voice Use During 1 Week of Ambulatory Monitoring
title_full_unstemmed Differences Between Female Singers With Phonotrauma and Vocally Healthy Matched Controls in Singing and Speaking Voice Use During 1 Week of Ambulatory Monitoring
title_short Differences Between Female Singers With Phonotrauma and Vocally Healthy Matched Controls in Singing and Speaking Voice Use During 1 Week of Ambulatory Monitoring
title_sort differences between female singers with phonotrauma and vocally healthy matched controls in singing and speaking voice use during 1 week of ambulatory monitoring
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8740583/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33472007
http://dx.doi.org/10.1044/2020_AJSLP-20-00227
work_keys_str_mv AT toleslaurae differencesbetweenfemalesingerswithphonotraumaandvocallyhealthymatchedcontrolsinsingingandspeakingvoiceuseduring1weekofambulatorymonitoring
AT ortizandrewj differencesbetweenfemalesingerswithphonotraumaandvocallyhealthymatchedcontrolsinsingingandspeakingvoiceuseduring1weekofambulatorymonitoring
AT markskatherinel differencesbetweenfemalesingerswithphonotraumaandvocallyhealthymatchedcontrolsinsingingandspeakingvoiceuseduring1weekofambulatorymonitoring
AT burnsjamesa differencesbetweenfemalesingerswithphonotraumaandvocallyhealthymatchedcontrolsinsingingandspeakingvoiceuseduring1weekofambulatorymonitoring
AT hrontiffiny differencesbetweenfemalesingerswithphonotraumaandvocallyhealthymatchedcontrolsinsingingandspeakingvoiceuseduring1weekofambulatorymonitoring
AT vanstanjarradh differencesbetweenfemalesingerswithphonotraumaandvocallyhealthymatchedcontrolsinsingingandspeakingvoiceuseduring1weekofambulatorymonitoring
AT mehtadaryushd differencesbetweenfemalesingerswithphonotraumaandvocallyhealthymatchedcontrolsinsingingandspeakingvoiceuseduring1weekofambulatorymonitoring
AT hillmanroberte differencesbetweenfemalesingerswithphonotraumaandvocallyhealthymatchedcontrolsinsingingandspeakingvoiceuseduring1weekofambulatorymonitoring