Cargando…
Differences Between Female Singers With Phonotrauma and Vocally Healthy Matched Controls in Singing and Speaking Voice Use During 1 Week of Ambulatory Monitoring
PURPOSE: Previous ambulatory voice monitoring studies have included many singers and have combined speech and singing in the analyses. This study applied a singing classifier to the ambulatory recordings of singers with phonotrauma and healthy controls to determine if analyzing speech and singing se...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Speech-Language-Hearing Association
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8740583/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33472007 http://dx.doi.org/10.1044/2020_AJSLP-20-00227 |
_version_ | 1784629340052389888 |
---|---|
author | Toles, Laura E. Ortiz, Andrew J. Marks, Katherine L. Burns, James A. Hron, Tiffiny Van Stan, Jarrad H. Mehta, Daryush D. Hillman, Robert E. |
author_facet | Toles, Laura E. Ortiz, Andrew J. Marks, Katherine L. Burns, James A. Hron, Tiffiny Van Stan, Jarrad H. Mehta, Daryush D. Hillman, Robert E. |
author_sort | Toles, Laura E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Previous ambulatory voice monitoring studies have included many singers and have combined speech and singing in the analyses. This study applied a singing classifier to the ambulatory recordings of singers with phonotrauma and healthy controls to determine if analyzing speech and singing separately would reveal voice use differences that could provide new insights into the etiology and pathophysiology of phonotrauma in this at-risk population. METHOD: Forty-two female singers with phonotrauma (vocal fold nodules or polyps) and 42 healthy matched controls were monitored using an ambulatory voice monitor. Weeklong statistics (average, standard deviation, skewness, kurtosis) for sound pressure level (SPL), fundamental frequency, cepstral peak prominence, the magnitude ratio of the first two harmonics (H(1)–H(2) ), and three vocal dose measures were computed from the neck surface acceleration signal and separated into singing and speech using a singing classifier. RESULTS: Mixed analysis of variance models found expected differences between singing and speech in each voice parameter, except SPL kurtosis. SPL skewness, SPL kurtosis, and all H(1)–H(2) distributional parameters differentiated patients and controls when singing and speech were combined. Interaction effects were found in H(1)–H(2) kurtosis and all vocal dose measures. Patients had significantly higher vocal doses in speech compared to controls. CONCLUSIONS: Consistent with prior work, the pathophysiology of phonotrauma in singers is characterized by more abrupt/complete glottal closure (decreased mean and variation for H(1)–H(2) ) and increased laryngeal forces (negatively skewed SPL distribution) during phonation. Application of a singing classifier to weeklong data revealed that singers with phonotrauma spent more time speaking on a weekly basis, but not more time singing, compared to controls. Results are used as a basis for hypothesizing about the role of speaking voice in the etiology of phonotraumatic vocal hyperfunction in singers. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8740583 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | American Speech-Language-Hearing Association |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87405832022-01-20 Differences Between Female Singers With Phonotrauma and Vocally Healthy Matched Controls in Singing and Speaking Voice Use During 1 Week of Ambulatory Monitoring Toles, Laura E. Ortiz, Andrew J. Marks, Katherine L. Burns, James A. Hron, Tiffiny Van Stan, Jarrad H. Mehta, Daryush D. Hillman, Robert E. Am J Speech Lang Pathol Research Articles PURPOSE: Previous ambulatory voice monitoring studies have included many singers and have combined speech and singing in the analyses. This study applied a singing classifier to the ambulatory recordings of singers with phonotrauma and healthy controls to determine if analyzing speech and singing separately would reveal voice use differences that could provide new insights into the etiology and pathophysiology of phonotrauma in this at-risk population. METHOD: Forty-two female singers with phonotrauma (vocal fold nodules or polyps) and 42 healthy matched controls were monitored using an ambulatory voice monitor. Weeklong statistics (average, standard deviation, skewness, kurtosis) for sound pressure level (SPL), fundamental frequency, cepstral peak prominence, the magnitude ratio of the first two harmonics (H(1)–H(2) ), and three vocal dose measures were computed from the neck surface acceleration signal and separated into singing and speech using a singing classifier. RESULTS: Mixed analysis of variance models found expected differences between singing and speech in each voice parameter, except SPL kurtosis. SPL skewness, SPL kurtosis, and all H(1)–H(2) distributional parameters differentiated patients and controls when singing and speech were combined. Interaction effects were found in H(1)–H(2) kurtosis and all vocal dose measures. Patients had significantly higher vocal doses in speech compared to controls. CONCLUSIONS: Consistent with prior work, the pathophysiology of phonotrauma in singers is characterized by more abrupt/complete glottal closure (decreased mean and variation for H(1)–H(2) ) and increased laryngeal forces (negatively skewed SPL distribution) during phonation. Application of a singing classifier to weeklong data revealed that singers with phonotrauma spent more time speaking on a weekly basis, but not more time singing, compared to controls. Results are used as a basis for hypothesizing about the role of speaking voice in the etiology of phonotraumatic vocal hyperfunction in singers. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association 2021-01 2021-01-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8740583/ /pubmed/33472007 http://dx.doi.org/10.1044/2020_AJSLP-20-00227 Text en Copyright © 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Research Articles Toles, Laura E. Ortiz, Andrew J. Marks, Katherine L. Burns, James A. Hron, Tiffiny Van Stan, Jarrad H. Mehta, Daryush D. Hillman, Robert E. Differences Between Female Singers With Phonotrauma and Vocally Healthy Matched Controls in Singing and Speaking Voice Use During 1 Week of Ambulatory Monitoring |
title | Differences Between Female Singers With Phonotrauma and Vocally Healthy Matched Controls in Singing and Speaking Voice Use During 1 Week of Ambulatory Monitoring |
title_full | Differences Between Female Singers With Phonotrauma and Vocally Healthy Matched Controls in Singing and Speaking Voice Use During 1 Week of Ambulatory Monitoring |
title_fullStr | Differences Between Female Singers With Phonotrauma and Vocally Healthy Matched Controls in Singing and Speaking Voice Use During 1 Week of Ambulatory Monitoring |
title_full_unstemmed | Differences Between Female Singers With Phonotrauma and Vocally Healthy Matched Controls in Singing and Speaking Voice Use During 1 Week of Ambulatory Monitoring |
title_short | Differences Between Female Singers With Phonotrauma and Vocally Healthy Matched Controls in Singing and Speaking Voice Use During 1 Week of Ambulatory Monitoring |
title_sort | differences between female singers with phonotrauma and vocally healthy matched controls in singing and speaking voice use during 1 week of ambulatory monitoring |
topic | Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8740583/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33472007 http://dx.doi.org/10.1044/2020_AJSLP-20-00227 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT toleslaurae differencesbetweenfemalesingerswithphonotraumaandvocallyhealthymatchedcontrolsinsingingandspeakingvoiceuseduring1weekofambulatorymonitoring AT ortizandrewj differencesbetweenfemalesingerswithphonotraumaandvocallyhealthymatchedcontrolsinsingingandspeakingvoiceuseduring1weekofambulatorymonitoring AT markskatherinel differencesbetweenfemalesingerswithphonotraumaandvocallyhealthymatchedcontrolsinsingingandspeakingvoiceuseduring1weekofambulatorymonitoring AT burnsjamesa differencesbetweenfemalesingerswithphonotraumaandvocallyhealthymatchedcontrolsinsingingandspeakingvoiceuseduring1weekofambulatorymonitoring AT hrontiffiny differencesbetweenfemalesingerswithphonotraumaandvocallyhealthymatchedcontrolsinsingingandspeakingvoiceuseduring1weekofambulatorymonitoring AT vanstanjarradh differencesbetweenfemalesingerswithphonotraumaandvocallyhealthymatchedcontrolsinsingingandspeakingvoiceuseduring1weekofambulatorymonitoring AT mehtadaryushd differencesbetweenfemalesingerswithphonotraumaandvocallyhealthymatchedcontrolsinsingingandspeakingvoiceuseduring1weekofambulatorymonitoring AT hillmanroberte differencesbetweenfemalesingerswithphonotraumaandvocallyhealthymatchedcontrolsinsingingandspeakingvoiceuseduring1weekofambulatorymonitoring |