Cargando…

A 24-Month Evaluation of Self-Adhering Flowable Composite Compared to Conventional Flowable Composite in Conservative Simple Occlusal Restorations: A Randomized Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND: Self-adhering flowable composite (SAFC) simplified restorative procedures, especially when compared to conventional techniques. Self-adhering composite revolutionized restorative dentistry by merging advances of adhesive and restorative materials to generate the so-called “eighth generat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shaalan, Omar Osama, Abou-Auf, Eman
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8740796/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35068835
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ccd.ccd_600_20
_version_ 1784629376614137856
author Shaalan, Omar Osama
Abou-Auf, Eman
author_facet Shaalan, Omar Osama
Abou-Auf, Eman
author_sort Shaalan, Omar Osama
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Self-adhering flowable composite (SAFC) simplified restorative procedures, especially when compared to conventional techniques. Self-adhering composite revolutionized restorative dentistry by merging advances of adhesive and restorative materials to generate the so-called “eighth generation.” AIMS: The objective of this clinical trial was to assess the clinical performance of SAFC compared to conventional flowable composite in minimally invasive occlusal cavities. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: A total of 18 patients with conservative occlusal cavities received randomly two types of restorations in a split-mouth design. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Vertise™ Flow or Filtek™ Z350XT Flowable was applied according to the manufacturer's instructions. All restorations were evaluated at baseline and after 24 months, respectively, by two blinded assessors using modified USPHS criteria. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Chi-square test was used for intragroup comparison between time points and intergroup comparison within each time point. A value of P ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Relative risk was used to determine the clinical significance. RESULTS: The results of the current study have revealed no statistically significant difference between both materials for all tested outcomes at baseline and after 24 months. CONCLUSIONS: SAFC revealed satisfactory clinical performance in restoration of minimally invasive occlusal cavities after 24-month follow-up.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8740796
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87407962022-01-21 A 24-Month Evaluation of Self-Adhering Flowable Composite Compared to Conventional Flowable Composite in Conservative Simple Occlusal Restorations: A Randomized Clinical Trial Shaalan, Omar Osama Abou-Auf, Eman Contemp Clin Dent Original Article BACKGROUND: Self-adhering flowable composite (SAFC) simplified restorative procedures, especially when compared to conventional techniques. Self-adhering composite revolutionized restorative dentistry by merging advances of adhesive and restorative materials to generate the so-called “eighth generation.” AIMS: The objective of this clinical trial was to assess the clinical performance of SAFC compared to conventional flowable composite in minimally invasive occlusal cavities. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: A total of 18 patients with conservative occlusal cavities received randomly two types of restorations in a split-mouth design. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Vertise™ Flow or Filtek™ Z350XT Flowable was applied according to the manufacturer's instructions. All restorations were evaluated at baseline and after 24 months, respectively, by two blinded assessors using modified USPHS criteria. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Chi-square test was used for intragroup comparison between time points and intergroup comparison within each time point. A value of P ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Relative risk was used to determine the clinical significance. RESULTS: The results of the current study have revealed no statistically significant difference between both materials for all tested outcomes at baseline and after 24 months. CONCLUSIONS: SAFC revealed satisfactory clinical performance in restoration of minimally invasive occlusal cavities after 24-month follow-up. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021 2021-12-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8740796/ /pubmed/35068835 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ccd.ccd_600_20 Text en Copyright: © 2021 Contemporary Clinical Dentistry https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Shaalan, Omar Osama
Abou-Auf, Eman
A 24-Month Evaluation of Self-Adhering Flowable Composite Compared to Conventional Flowable Composite in Conservative Simple Occlusal Restorations: A Randomized Clinical Trial
title A 24-Month Evaluation of Self-Adhering Flowable Composite Compared to Conventional Flowable Composite in Conservative Simple Occlusal Restorations: A Randomized Clinical Trial
title_full A 24-Month Evaluation of Self-Adhering Flowable Composite Compared to Conventional Flowable Composite in Conservative Simple Occlusal Restorations: A Randomized Clinical Trial
title_fullStr A 24-Month Evaluation of Self-Adhering Flowable Composite Compared to Conventional Flowable Composite in Conservative Simple Occlusal Restorations: A Randomized Clinical Trial
title_full_unstemmed A 24-Month Evaluation of Self-Adhering Flowable Composite Compared to Conventional Flowable Composite in Conservative Simple Occlusal Restorations: A Randomized Clinical Trial
title_short A 24-Month Evaluation of Self-Adhering Flowable Composite Compared to Conventional Flowable Composite in Conservative Simple Occlusal Restorations: A Randomized Clinical Trial
title_sort 24-month evaluation of self-adhering flowable composite compared to conventional flowable composite in conservative simple occlusal restorations: a randomized clinical trial
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8740796/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35068835
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ccd.ccd_600_20
work_keys_str_mv AT shaalanomarosama a24monthevaluationofselfadheringflowablecompositecomparedtoconventionalflowablecompositeinconservativesimpleocclusalrestorationsarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT abouaufeman a24monthevaluationofselfadheringflowablecompositecomparedtoconventionalflowablecompositeinconservativesimpleocclusalrestorationsarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT shaalanomarosama 24monthevaluationofselfadheringflowablecompositecomparedtoconventionalflowablecompositeinconservativesimpleocclusalrestorationsarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT abouaufeman 24monthevaluationofselfadheringflowablecompositecomparedtoconventionalflowablecompositeinconservativesimpleocclusalrestorationsarandomizedclinicaltrial