Cargando…

Can open-defecation free (ODF) communities be sustained? A cross-sectional study in rural Ghana

Community-led total sanitation (CLTS) is a widely used approach to reduce open defecation in rural areas of low-income countries. Following CLTS programs, communities are designated as open defecation free (ODF) when household-level toilet coverage reaches the threshold specified by national guideli...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Delaire, Caroline, Kisiangani, Joyce, Stuart, Kara, Antwi-Agyei, Prince, Khush, Ranjiv, Peletz, Rachel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8740968/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34995310
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0261674
_version_ 1784629405690101760
author Delaire, Caroline
Kisiangani, Joyce
Stuart, Kara
Antwi-Agyei, Prince
Khush, Ranjiv
Peletz, Rachel
author_facet Delaire, Caroline
Kisiangani, Joyce
Stuart, Kara
Antwi-Agyei, Prince
Khush, Ranjiv
Peletz, Rachel
author_sort Delaire, Caroline
collection PubMed
description Community-led total sanitation (CLTS) is a widely used approach to reduce open defecation in rural areas of low-income countries. Following CLTS programs, communities are designated as open defecation free (ODF) when household-level toilet coverage reaches the threshold specified by national guidelines (e.g., 80% in Ghana). However, because sanitation conditions are rarely monitored after communities are declared ODF, the ability of CLTS to generate lasting reductions in open defecation is poorly understood. In this study, we examined the extent to which levels of toilet ownership and use were sustained in 109 communities in rural Northern Ghana up to two and a half years after they had obtained ODF status. We found that the majority of communities (75%) did not meet Ghana’s ODF requirements. Over a third of households had either never owned (16%) or no longer owned (24%) a functional toilet, and 25% reported practicing open defecation regularly. Toilet pit and superstructure collapse were the primary causes of reversion to open defecation. Multivariate regression analysis indicated that communities had higher toilet coverage when they were located further from major roads, were not located on rocky soil, reported having a system of fines to punish open defecation, and when less time had elapsed since ODF status achievement. Households were more likely to own a functional toilet if they were larger, wealthier, had a male household head who had not completed primary education, had no children under the age of five, and benefitted from the national Livelihood Empowerment Against Poverty (LEAP) program. Wealthier households were also more likely to use a toilet for defecation and to rebuild their toilet when it collapsed. Our findings suggest that interventions that address toilet collapse and the difficulty of rebuilding, particularly among the poorest and most vulnerable households, will improve the longevity of CLTS-driven sanitation improvements in rural Ghana.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8740968
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87409682022-01-08 Can open-defecation free (ODF) communities be sustained? A cross-sectional study in rural Ghana Delaire, Caroline Kisiangani, Joyce Stuart, Kara Antwi-Agyei, Prince Khush, Ranjiv Peletz, Rachel PLoS One Research Article Community-led total sanitation (CLTS) is a widely used approach to reduce open defecation in rural areas of low-income countries. Following CLTS programs, communities are designated as open defecation free (ODF) when household-level toilet coverage reaches the threshold specified by national guidelines (e.g., 80% in Ghana). However, because sanitation conditions are rarely monitored after communities are declared ODF, the ability of CLTS to generate lasting reductions in open defecation is poorly understood. In this study, we examined the extent to which levels of toilet ownership and use were sustained in 109 communities in rural Northern Ghana up to two and a half years after they had obtained ODF status. We found that the majority of communities (75%) did not meet Ghana’s ODF requirements. Over a third of households had either never owned (16%) or no longer owned (24%) a functional toilet, and 25% reported practicing open defecation regularly. Toilet pit and superstructure collapse were the primary causes of reversion to open defecation. Multivariate regression analysis indicated that communities had higher toilet coverage when they were located further from major roads, were not located on rocky soil, reported having a system of fines to punish open defecation, and when less time had elapsed since ODF status achievement. Households were more likely to own a functional toilet if they were larger, wealthier, had a male household head who had not completed primary education, had no children under the age of five, and benefitted from the national Livelihood Empowerment Against Poverty (LEAP) program. Wealthier households were also more likely to use a toilet for defecation and to rebuild their toilet when it collapsed. Our findings suggest that interventions that address toilet collapse and the difficulty of rebuilding, particularly among the poorest and most vulnerable households, will improve the longevity of CLTS-driven sanitation improvements in rural Ghana. Public Library of Science 2022-01-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8740968/ /pubmed/34995310 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0261674 Text en © 2022 Delaire et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Delaire, Caroline
Kisiangani, Joyce
Stuart, Kara
Antwi-Agyei, Prince
Khush, Ranjiv
Peletz, Rachel
Can open-defecation free (ODF) communities be sustained? A cross-sectional study in rural Ghana
title Can open-defecation free (ODF) communities be sustained? A cross-sectional study in rural Ghana
title_full Can open-defecation free (ODF) communities be sustained? A cross-sectional study in rural Ghana
title_fullStr Can open-defecation free (ODF) communities be sustained? A cross-sectional study in rural Ghana
title_full_unstemmed Can open-defecation free (ODF) communities be sustained? A cross-sectional study in rural Ghana
title_short Can open-defecation free (ODF) communities be sustained? A cross-sectional study in rural Ghana
title_sort can open-defecation free (odf) communities be sustained? a cross-sectional study in rural ghana
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8740968/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34995310
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0261674
work_keys_str_mv AT delairecaroline canopendefecationfreeodfcommunitiesbesustainedacrosssectionalstudyinruralghana
AT kisianganijoyce canopendefecationfreeodfcommunitiesbesustainedacrosssectionalstudyinruralghana
AT stuartkara canopendefecationfreeodfcommunitiesbesustainedacrosssectionalstudyinruralghana
AT antwiagyeiprince canopendefecationfreeodfcommunitiesbesustainedacrosssectionalstudyinruralghana
AT khushranjiv canopendefecationfreeodfcommunitiesbesustainedacrosssectionalstudyinruralghana
AT peletzrachel canopendefecationfreeodfcommunitiesbesustainedacrosssectionalstudyinruralghana