From Chest Wall Resection to Medical Management: The Continued Saga of Parapneumonic Effusion Management and Future Directions

Pleural space infections have been described since the time of Hippocrates and to this day remains a significant pathology. Every year in the USA approximately there are one million hospital admissions for pneumonia with 20%-40% associated with some form of pleural space infections leading to pleural effusions with increased morbidity and mortality. Often, management of these effusions mandate combination of medical treatment and surgical drainage with debridement and decortication. There has been a lot of ongoing research regarding the safety and efficacy of intrapleural fibrinolytics in the management of complicated pleural effusions and empyema. Till this day, areas of debate and controversies exist among clinicians treating pleural space infection. Empyema is historically considered a surgical disease. There have been societies and guidelines for the management of infected parapneumonic effusions with antibiotics and chest tube drainage as an initial empiric treatment modality. With the advances in the use of Intrapleural fibrinolytics and minimally invasive procedures such as video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS), empyema a surgical disease is now more favoring medical management. Surgical option, such as open thoracotomy, is reserved for patients who failed conservative management and chronic empyema. The aim of this comprehensive review is to shed light on the evolution of various management strategies from the era of Hippocrates to current day practice and how there continues to be a paradigm shift in treating empyema as a surgical condition to a medical disease.