Cargando…

Rapid visual detection of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus via recombinase polymerase amplification combined with a lateral flow dipstick

Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PRRS) is one of the most economically devastating infectious diseases in the global swine industry. A rapid and sensitive on-site detection method for PRRS virus (PRRSV) is critically important for diagnosing PRRS. In this study, we established a method...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tian, Xiao-Xiao, Wang, Tao, Cui, Xing-Yang, Huang, Xin-Yi, Sun, Yue, Xia, Da-Song, Yang, Yong-Bo, Cai, Xue-Hui, An, Tong-Qing
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Vienna 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8741141/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34997320
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00705-021-05349-8
Descripción
Sumario:Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PRRS) is one of the most economically devastating infectious diseases in the global swine industry. A rapid and sensitive on-site detection method for PRRS virus (PRRSV) is critically important for diagnosing PRRS. In this study, we established a method that combines reverse transcription recombinase polymerase amplification (RT-RPA) with a lateral flow dipstick (LFD) for detecting North American PRRSV (PRRSV-2). The primers and probe were designed based on the conserved region of all complete PRRSV-2 genomic sequences available in China (n = 512) from 1996 to 2020. The detection limit of the assay was 5.6 × 10(-1) median tissue culture infection dose (TCID(50)) per reaction within 30 min at 42 °C, which was more sensitive than that of reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) (5.6 TCID(50) per reaction). The assay was highly specific for the epidemic lineages of PRRSV-2 in China and did not cross-react with pseudorabies virus, porcine circovirus 2, classical swine fever virus, or porcine epidemic diarrhea virus. The assay performance was evaluated by testing 179 samples and comparing the results with those of quantitative RT-PCR (RT-qPCR). The results showed that the detection coincidence rate of RT-RPA and RT-qPCR was 100% when the cycle threshold values of RT-qPCR were < 32. The assay provides a new alternative for simple and reliable detection of PRRSV-2 and has great potential for application in the field. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00705-021-05349-8.