Cargando…
Antibody Surface Coverage Drives Matrix Interference in Microfluidic Capillary Immunoassays
[Image: see text] The performance of biosensors is often optimized in buffers, which brings inconsistencies during applications with biological samples. Current strategies for minimizing sample (matrix) interference are complex to automate and miniaturize, involving, e.g., sample dilution or recover...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Chemical Society
2021
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8741144/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34138534 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acssensors.1c00704 |
_version_ | 1784629424836050944 |
---|---|
author | Barbosa, Ana I. Edwards, Alexander D. Reis, Nuno M. |
author_facet | Barbosa, Ana I. Edwards, Alexander D. Reis, Nuno M. |
author_sort | Barbosa, Ana I. |
collection | PubMed |
description | [Image: see text] The performance of biosensors is often optimized in buffers, which brings inconsistencies during applications with biological samples. Current strategies for minimizing sample (matrix) interference are complex to automate and miniaturize, involving, e.g., sample dilution or recovery of serum/plasma. This study shows the first systematic analysis using hundreds of actual microfluidic immunoassay fluoropolymer strips to understand matrix interference in microflow systems. As many interfering factors are assay-specific, we have explored matrix interference for a range of enzymatic immunoassays, including a direct mIgG/anti-mIgG, a sandwich cancer biomarker PSA, and a sandwich inflammatory cytokine IL-1β. Serum matrix interference was significantly affected by capillary antibody surface coverage, suggesting for the first time that the main cause of the serum matrix effect is low-affinity serum components (e.g., autoantibodies) competing with high-affinity antigens for the immobilized antibody. Additional experiments carried out with different capillary diameters confirmed the importance of antibody surface coverage in managing matrix interference. Building on these findings, we propose a novel analytical approach where antibody surface coverage and sample incubation times are key for eliminating and/or minimizing serum matrix interference, consisting in bioassay optimization carried out in serum instead of buffer, without compromising the performance of the bioassay or adding extra cost or steps. This will help establishing a new route toward faster development of modern point-of-care tests and effective biosensor development. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8741144 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | American Chemical Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87411442022-01-10 Antibody Surface Coverage Drives Matrix Interference in Microfluidic Capillary Immunoassays Barbosa, Ana I. Edwards, Alexander D. Reis, Nuno M. ACS Sens [Image: see text] The performance of biosensors is often optimized in buffers, which brings inconsistencies during applications with biological samples. Current strategies for minimizing sample (matrix) interference are complex to automate and miniaturize, involving, e.g., sample dilution or recovery of serum/plasma. This study shows the first systematic analysis using hundreds of actual microfluidic immunoassay fluoropolymer strips to understand matrix interference in microflow systems. As many interfering factors are assay-specific, we have explored matrix interference for a range of enzymatic immunoassays, including a direct mIgG/anti-mIgG, a sandwich cancer biomarker PSA, and a sandwich inflammatory cytokine IL-1β. Serum matrix interference was significantly affected by capillary antibody surface coverage, suggesting for the first time that the main cause of the serum matrix effect is low-affinity serum components (e.g., autoantibodies) competing with high-affinity antigens for the immobilized antibody. Additional experiments carried out with different capillary diameters confirmed the importance of antibody surface coverage in managing matrix interference. Building on these findings, we propose a novel analytical approach where antibody surface coverage and sample incubation times are key for eliminating and/or minimizing serum matrix interference, consisting in bioassay optimization carried out in serum instead of buffer, without compromising the performance of the bioassay or adding extra cost or steps. This will help establishing a new route toward faster development of modern point-of-care tests and effective biosensor development. American Chemical Society 2021-06-17 2021-07-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8741144/ /pubmed/34138534 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acssensors.1c00704 Text en © 2021 American Chemical Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Permits the broadest form of re-use including for commercial purposes, provided that author attribution and integrity are maintained (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Barbosa, Ana I. Edwards, Alexander D. Reis, Nuno M. Antibody Surface Coverage Drives Matrix Interference in Microfluidic Capillary Immunoassays |
title | Antibody Surface Coverage Drives Matrix Interference
in Microfluidic Capillary Immunoassays |
title_full | Antibody Surface Coverage Drives Matrix Interference
in Microfluidic Capillary Immunoassays |
title_fullStr | Antibody Surface Coverage Drives Matrix Interference
in Microfluidic Capillary Immunoassays |
title_full_unstemmed | Antibody Surface Coverage Drives Matrix Interference
in Microfluidic Capillary Immunoassays |
title_short | Antibody Surface Coverage Drives Matrix Interference
in Microfluidic Capillary Immunoassays |
title_sort | antibody surface coverage drives matrix interference
in microfluidic capillary immunoassays |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8741144/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34138534 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acssensors.1c00704 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT barbosaanai antibodysurfacecoveragedrivesmatrixinterferenceinmicrofluidiccapillaryimmunoassays AT edwardsalexanderd antibodysurfacecoveragedrivesmatrixinterferenceinmicrofluidiccapillaryimmunoassays AT reisnunom antibodysurfacecoveragedrivesmatrixinterferenceinmicrofluidiccapillaryimmunoassays |