Cargando…
Evaluating machine learning models for sepsis prediction: A systematic review of methodologies
Studies for sepsis prediction using machine learning are developing rapidly in medical science recently. In this review, we propose a set of new evaluation criteria and reporting standards to assess 21 qualified machine learning models for quality analysis based on PRISMA. Our assessment shows that...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8741489/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35028534 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2021.103651 |
_version_ | 1784629501858152448 |
---|---|
author | Deng, Hong-Fei Sun, Ming-Wei Wang, Yu Zeng, Jun Yuan, Ting Li, Ting Li, Di-Huan Chen, Wei Zhou, Ping Wang, Qi Jiang, Hua |
author_facet | Deng, Hong-Fei Sun, Ming-Wei Wang, Yu Zeng, Jun Yuan, Ting Li, Ting Li, Di-Huan Chen, Wei Zhou, Ping Wang, Qi Jiang, Hua |
author_sort | Deng, Hong-Fei |
collection | PubMed |
description | Studies for sepsis prediction using machine learning are developing rapidly in medical science recently. In this review, we propose a set of new evaluation criteria and reporting standards to assess 21 qualified machine learning models for quality analysis based on PRISMA. Our assessment shows that (1.) the definition of sepsis is not consistent among the studies; (2.) data sources and data preprocessing methods, machine learning models, feature engineering, and inclusion types vary widely among the studies; (3.) the closer to the onset of sepsis, the higher the value of AUROC is; (4.) the improvement in AUROC is primarily due to using machine learning as a feature engineering tool; (5.) deep neural networks coupled with Sepsis-3 diagnostic criteria tend to yield better results on the time series data collected from patients with sepsis. The new evaluation criteria and reporting standards will facilitate the development of improved machine learning models for clinical applications. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8741489 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87414892022-01-12 Evaluating machine learning models for sepsis prediction: A systematic review of methodologies Deng, Hong-Fei Sun, Ming-Wei Wang, Yu Zeng, Jun Yuan, Ting Li, Ting Li, Di-Huan Chen, Wei Zhou, Ping Wang, Qi Jiang, Hua iScience Article Studies for sepsis prediction using machine learning are developing rapidly in medical science recently. In this review, we propose a set of new evaluation criteria and reporting standards to assess 21 qualified machine learning models for quality analysis based on PRISMA. Our assessment shows that (1.) the definition of sepsis is not consistent among the studies; (2.) data sources and data preprocessing methods, machine learning models, feature engineering, and inclusion types vary widely among the studies; (3.) the closer to the onset of sepsis, the higher the value of AUROC is; (4.) the improvement in AUROC is primarily due to using machine learning as a feature engineering tool; (5.) deep neural networks coupled with Sepsis-3 diagnostic criteria tend to yield better results on the time series data collected from patients with sepsis. The new evaluation criteria and reporting standards will facilitate the development of improved machine learning models for clinical applications. Elsevier 2021-12-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8741489/ /pubmed/35028534 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2021.103651 Text en © 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Deng, Hong-Fei Sun, Ming-Wei Wang, Yu Zeng, Jun Yuan, Ting Li, Ting Li, Di-Huan Chen, Wei Zhou, Ping Wang, Qi Jiang, Hua Evaluating machine learning models for sepsis prediction: A systematic review of methodologies |
title | Evaluating machine learning models for sepsis prediction: A systematic review of methodologies |
title_full | Evaluating machine learning models for sepsis prediction: A systematic review of methodologies |
title_fullStr | Evaluating machine learning models for sepsis prediction: A systematic review of methodologies |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluating machine learning models for sepsis prediction: A systematic review of methodologies |
title_short | Evaluating machine learning models for sepsis prediction: A systematic review of methodologies |
title_sort | evaluating machine learning models for sepsis prediction: a systematic review of methodologies |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8741489/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35028534 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2021.103651 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT denghongfei evaluatingmachinelearningmodelsforsepsispredictionasystematicreviewofmethodologies AT sunmingwei evaluatingmachinelearningmodelsforsepsispredictionasystematicreviewofmethodologies AT wangyu evaluatingmachinelearningmodelsforsepsispredictionasystematicreviewofmethodologies AT zengjun evaluatingmachinelearningmodelsforsepsispredictionasystematicreviewofmethodologies AT yuanting evaluatingmachinelearningmodelsforsepsispredictionasystematicreviewofmethodologies AT liting evaluatingmachinelearningmodelsforsepsispredictionasystematicreviewofmethodologies AT lidihuan evaluatingmachinelearningmodelsforsepsispredictionasystematicreviewofmethodologies AT chenwei evaluatingmachinelearningmodelsforsepsispredictionasystematicreviewofmethodologies AT zhouping evaluatingmachinelearningmodelsforsepsispredictionasystematicreviewofmethodologies AT wangqi evaluatingmachinelearningmodelsforsepsispredictionasystematicreviewofmethodologies AT jianghua evaluatingmachinelearningmodelsforsepsispredictionasystematicreviewofmethodologies |