Cargando…

Evaluating machine learning models for sepsis prediction: A systematic review of methodologies

Studies for sepsis prediction using machine learning are developing rapidly in medical science recently. In this review, we propose a set of new evaluation criteria and reporting standards to assess 21 qualified machine learning models for quality analysis based on PRISMA. Our assessment shows that...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Deng, Hong-Fei, Sun, Ming-Wei, Wang, Yu, Zeng, Jun, Yuan, Ting, Li, Ting, Li, Di-Huan, Chen, Wei, Zhou, Ping, Wang, Qi, Jiang, Hua
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8741489/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35028534
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2021.103651
_version_ 1784629501858152448
author Deng, Hong-Fei
Sun, Ming-Wei
Wang, Yu
Zeng, Jun
Yuan, Ting
Li, Ting
Li, Di-Huan
Chen, Wei
Zhou, Ping
Wang, Qi
Jiang, Hua
author_facet Deng, Hong-Fei
Sun, Ming-Wei
Wang, Yu
Zeng, Jun
Yuan, Ting
Li, Ting
Li, Di-Huan
Chen, Wei
Zhou, Ping
Wang, Qi
Jiang, Hua
author_sort Deng, Hong-Fei
collection PubMed
description Studies for sepsis prediction using machine learning are developing rapidly in medical science recently. In this review, we propose a set of new evaluation criteria and reporting standards to assess 21 qualified machine learning models for quality analysis based on PRISMA. Our assessment shows that (1.) the definition of sepsis is not consistent among the studies; (2.) data sources and data preprocessing methods, machine learning models, feature engineering, and inclusion types vary widely among the studies; (3.) the closer to the onset of sepsis, the higher the value of AUROC is; (4.) the improvement in AUROC is primarily due to using machine learning as a feature engineering tool; (5.) deep neural networks coupled with Sepsis-3 diagnostic criteria tend to yield better results on the time series data collected from patients with sepsis. The new evaluation criteria and reporting standards will facilitate the development of improved machine learning models for clinical applications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8741489
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87414892022-01-12 Evaluating machine learning models for sepsis prediction: A systematic review of methodologies Deng, Hong-Fei Sun, Ming-Wei Wang, Yu Zeng, Jun Yuan, Ting Li, Ting Li, Di-Huan Chen, Wei Zhou, Ping Wang, Qi Jiang, Hua iScience Article Studies for sepsis prediction using machine learning are developing rapidly in medical science recently. In this review, we propose a set of new evaluation criteria and reporting standards to assess 21 qualified machine learning models for quality analysis based on PRISMA. Our assessment shows that (1.) the definition of sepsis is not consistent among the studies; (2.) data sources and data preprocessing methods, machine learning models, feature engineering, and inclusion types vary widely among the studies; (3.) the closer to the onset of sepsis, the higher the value of AUROC is; (4.) the improvement in AUROC is primarily due to using machine learning as a feature engineering tool; (5.) deep neural networks coupled with Sepsis-3 diagnostic criteria tend to yield better results on the time series data collected from patients with sepsis. The new evaluation criteria and reporting standards will facilitate the development of improved machine learning models for clinical applications. Elsevier 2021-12-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8741489/ /pubmed/35028534 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2021.103651 Text en © 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Deng, Hong-Fei
Sun, Ming-Wei
Wang, Yu
Zeng, Jun
Yuan, Ting
Li, Ting
Li, Di-Huan
Chen, Wei
Zhou, Ping
Wang, Qi
Jiang, Hua
Evaluating machine learning models for sepsis prediction: A systematic review of methodologies
title Evaluating machine learning models for sepsis prediction: A systematic review of methodologies
title_full Evaluating machine learning models for sepsis prediction: A systematic review of methodologies
title_fullStr Evaluating machine learning models for sepsis prediction: A systematic review of methodologies
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating machine learning models for sepsis prediction: A systematic review of methodologies
title_short Evaluating machine learning models for sepsis prediction: A systematic review of methodologies
title_sort evaluating machine learning models for sepsis prediction: a systematic review of methodologies
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8741489/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35028534
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2021.103651
work_keys_str_mv AT denghongfei evaluatingmachinelearningmodelsforsepsispredictionasystematicreviewofmethodologies
AT sunmingwei evaluatingmachinelearningmodelsforsepsispredictionasystematicreviewofmethodologies
AT wangyu evaluatingmachinelearningmodelsforsepsispredictionasystematicreviewofmethodologies
AT zengjun evaluatingmachinelearningmodelsforsepsispredictionasystematicreviewofmethodologies
AT yuanting evaluatingmachinelearningmodelsforsepsispredictionasystematicreviewofmethodologies
AT liting evaluatingmachinelearningmodelsforsepsispredictionasystematicreviewofmethodologies
AT lidihuan evaluatingmachinelearningmodelsforsepsispredictionasystematicreviewofmethodologies
AT chenwei evaluatingmachinelearningmodelsforsepsispredictionasystematicreviewofmethodologies
AT zhouping evaluatingmachinelearningmodelsforsepsispredictionasystematicreviewofmethodologies
AT wangqi evaluatingmachinelearningmodelsforsepsispredictionasystematicreviewofmethodologies
AT jianghua evaluatingmachinelearningmodelsforsepsispredictionasystematicreviewofmethodologies