Cargando…

Systematic genetic testing for recessively inherited monogenic diabetes: a cross-sectional study in paediatric diabetes clinics

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Current clinical guidelines for childhood-onset monogenic diabetes outside infancy are mainly focused on identifying and testing for dominantly inherited, predominantly MODY genes. There are no systematic studies of the recessively inherited causes of monogenic diabetes that are lik...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Patel, Kashyap A., Ozbek, Mehmet N., Yildiz, Melek, Guran, Tulay, Kocyigit, Cemil, Acar, Sezer, Siklar, Zeynep, Atar, Muge, Colclough, Kevin, Houghton, Jayne, Johnson, Matthew B., Ellard, Sian, Flanagan, Sarah E., Cizmecioglu, Filiz, Berberoglu, Merih, Demir, Korcan, Catli, Gonul, Bas, Serpil, Akcay, Teoman, Demirbilek, Huseyin, Weedon, Michael N., Hattersley, Andrew T.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8741690/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34686905
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00125-021-05597-y
_version_ 1784629546438361088
author Patel, Kashyap A.
Ozbek, Mehmet N.
Yildiz, Melek
Guran, Tulay
Kocyigit, Cemil
Acar, Sezer
Siklar, Zeynep
Atar, Muge
Colclough, Kevin
Houghton, Jayne
Johnson, Matthew B.
Ellard, Sian
Flanagan, Sarah E.
Cizmecioglu, Filiz
Berberoglu, Merih
Demir, Korcan
Catli, Gonul
Bas, Serpil
Akcay, Teoman
Demirbilek, Huseyin
Weedon, Michael N.
Hattersley, Andrew T.
author_facet Patel, Kashyap A.
Ozbek, Mehmet N.
Yildiz, Melek
Guran, Tulay
Kocyigit, Cemil
Acar, Sezer
Siklar, Zeynep
Atar, Muge
Colclough, Kevin
Houghton, Jayne
Johnson, Matthew B.
Ellard, Sian
Flanagan, Sarah E.
Cizmecioglu, Filiz
Berberoglu, Merih
Demir, Korcan
Catli, Gonul
Bas, Serpil
Akcay, Teoman
Demirbilek, Huseyin
Weedon, Michael N.
Hattersley, Andrew T.
author_sort Patel, Kashyap A.
collection PubMed
description AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Current clinical guidelines for childhood-onset monogenic diabetes outside infancy are mainly focused on identifying and testing for dominantly inherited, predominantly MODY genes. There are no systematic studies of the recessively inherited causes of monogenic diabetes that are likely to be more common in populations with high rates of consanguinity. We aimed to determine the contribution of recessive causes of monogenic diabetes in paediatric diabetes clinics and to identify clinical criteria by which to select individuals for recessive monogenic diabetes testing. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study of 1093 children from seven paediatric diabetes clinics across Turkey (a population with high rates of consanguinity). We undertook genetic testing of 50 known dominant and recessive causes of monogenic diabetes for 236 children at low risk of type 1 diabetes. As a comparison, we used monogenic diabetes cases from UK paediatric diabetes clinics (a population with low rates of consanguinity). RESULTS: Thirty-four children in the Turkish cohort had monogenic diabetes, equating to a minimal prevalence of 3.1%, similar to that in the UK cohort (p = 0.40). Forty-one per cent (14/34) had autosomal recessive causes in contrast to 1.6% (2/122) in the UK monogenic diabetes cohort (p < 0.0001). All conventional criteria for identifying monogenic diabetes (parental diabetes, not requiring insulin treatment, HbA(1c) ≤ 58 mmol/mol [≤7.5%] and a composite clinical probability of MODY >10%) assisted the identification of the dominant (all p ≤ 0.0003) but not recessive cases (all p ≥ 0.2) in Turkey. The presence of certain non-autoimmune extra-pancreatic features greatly assisted the identification of recessive (p < 0.0001, OR 66.9) but not dominant cases. CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: Recessively inherited mutations are a common cause of monogenic diabetes in populations with high rates of consanguinity. Present MODY-focused genetic testing strategies do not identify affected individuals. To detect all cases of monogenic paediatric diabetes, it is crucial that recessive genes are included in genetic panels and that children are selected for testing if they have certain non-autoimmune extra-pancreatic features in addition to current criteria. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00125-021-05597-y) contains peer-reviewed but unedited supplementary material.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8741690
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87416902022-01-20 Systematic genetic testing for recessively inherited monogenic diabetes: a cross-sectional study in paediatric diabetes clinics Patel, Kashyap A. Ozbek, Mehmet N. Yildiz, Melek Guran, Tulay Kocyigit, Cemil Acar, Sezer Siklar, Zeynep Atar, Muge Colclough, Kevin Houghton, Jayne Johnson, Matthew B. Ellard, Sian Flanagan, Sarah E. Cizmecioglu, Filiz Berberoglu, Merih Demir, Korcan Catli, Gonul Bas, Serpil Akcay, Teoman Demirbilek, Huseyin Weedon, Michael N. Hattersley, Andrew T. Diabetologia Short Communication AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Current clinical guidelines for childhood-onset monogenic diabetes outside infancy are mainly focused on identifying and testing for dominantly inherited, predominantly MODY genes. There are no systematic studies of the recessively inherited causes of monogenic diabetes that are likely to be more common in populations with high rates of consanguinity. We aimed to determine the contribution of recessive causes of monogenic diabetes in paediatric diabetes clinics and to identify clinical criteria by which to select individuals for recessive monogenic diabetes testing. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study of 1093 children from seven paediatric diabetes clinics across Turkey (a population with high rates of consanguinity). We undertook genetic testing of 50 known dominant and recessive causes of monogenic diabetes for 236 children at low risk of type 1 diabetes. As a comparison, we used monogenic diabetes cases from UK paediatric diabetes clinics (a population with low rates of consanguinity). RESULTS: Thirty-four children in the Turkish cohort had monogenic diabetes, equating to a minimal prevalence of 3.1%, similar to that in the UK cohort (p = 0.40). Forty-one per cent (14/34) had autosomal recessive causes in contrast to 1.6% (2/122) in the UK monogenic diabetes cohort (p < 0.0001). All conventional criteria for identifying monogenic diabetes (parental diabetes, not requiring insulin treatment, HbA(1c) ≤ 58 mmol/mol [≤7.5%] and a composite clinical probability of MODY >10%) assisted the identification of the dominant (all p ≤ 0.0003) but not recessive cases (all p ≥ 0.2) in Turkey. The presence of certain non-autoimmune extra-pancreatic features greatly assisted the identification of recessive (p < 0.0001, OR 66.9) but not dominant cases. CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: Recessively inherited mutations are a common cause of monogenic diabetes in populations with high rates of consanguinity. Present MODY-focused genetic testing strategies do not identify affected individuals. To detect all cases of monogenic paediatric diabetes, it is crucial that recessive genes are included in genetic panels and that children are selected for testing if they have certain non-autoimmune extra-pancreatic features in addition to current criteria. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00125-021-05597-y) contains peer-reviewed but unedited supplementary material. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-10-23 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8741690/ /pubmed/34686905 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00125-021-05597-y Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Short Communication
Patel, Kashyap A.
Ozbek, Mehmet N.
Yildiz, Melek
Guran, Tulay
Kocyigit, Cemil
Acar, Sezer
Siklar, Zeynep
Atar, Muge
Colclough, Kevin
Houghton, Jayne
Johnson, Matthew B.
Ellard, Sian
Flanagan, Sarah E.
Cizmecioglu, Filiz
Berberoglu, Merih
Demir, Korcan
Catli, Gonul
Bas, Serpil
Akcay, Teoman
Demirbilek, Huseyin
Weedon, Michael N.
Hattersley, Andrew T.
Systematic genetic testing for recessively inherited monogenic diabetes: a cross-sectional study in paediatric diabetes clinics
title Systematic genetic testing for recessively inherited monogenic diabetes: a cross-sectional study in paediatric diabetes clinics
title_full Systematic genetic testing for recessively inherited monogenic diabetes: a cross-sectional study in paediatric diabetes clinics
title_fullStr Systematic genetic testing for recessively inherited monogenic diabetes: a cross-sectional study in paediatric diabetes clinics
title_full_unstemmed Systematic genetic testing for recessively inherited monogenic diabetes: a cross-sectional study in paediatric diabetes clinics
title_short Systematic genetic testing for recessively inherited monogenic diabetes: a cross-sectional study in paediatric diabetes clinics
title_sort systematic genetic testing for recessively inherited monogenic diabetes: a cross-sectional study in paediatric diabetes clinics
topic Short Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8741690/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34686905
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00125-021-05597-y
work_keys_str_mv AT patelkashyapa systematicgenetictestingforrecessivelyinheritedmonogenicdiabetesacrosssectionalstudyinpaediatricdiabetesclinics
AT ozbekmehmetn systematicgenetictestingforrecessivelyinheritedmonogenicdiabetesacrosssectionalstudyinpaediatricdiabetesclinics
AT yildizmelek systematicgenetictestingforrecessivelyinheritedmonogenicdiabetesacrosssectionalstudyinpaediatricdiabetesclinics
AT gurantulay systematicgenetictestingforrecessivelyinheritedmonogenicdiabetesacrosssectionalstudyinpaediatricdiabetesclinics
AT kocyigitcemil systematicgenetictestingforrecessivelyinheritedmonogenicdiabetesacrosssectionalstudyinpaediatricdiabetesclinics
AT acarsezer systematicgenetictestingforrecessivelyinheritedmonogenicdiabetesacrosssectionalstudyinpaediatricdiabetesclinics
AT siklarzeynep systematicgenetictestingforrecessivelyinheritedmonogenicdiabetesacrosssectionalstudyinpaediatricdiabetesclinics
AT atarmuge systematicgenetictestingforrecessivelyinheritedmonogenicdiabetesacrosssectionalstudyinpaediatricdiabetesclinics
AT colcloughkevin systematicgenetictestingforrecessivelyinheritedmonogenicdiabetesacrosssectionalstudyinpaediatricdiabetesclinics
AT houghtonjayne systematicgenetictestingforrecessivelyinheritedmonogenicdiabetesacrosssectionalstudyinpaediatricdiabetesclinics
AT johnsonmatthewb systematicgenetictestingforrecessivelyinheritedmonogenicdiabetesacrosssectionalstudyinpaediatricdiabetesclinics
AT ellardsian systematicgenetictestingforrecessivelyinheritedmonogenicdiabetesacrosssectionalstudyinpaediatricdiabetesclinics
AT flanagansarahe systematicgenetictestingforrecessivelyinheritedmonogenicdiabetesacrosssectionalstudyinpaediatricdiabetesclinics
AT cizmecioglufiliz systematicgenetictestingforrecessivelyinheritedmonogenicdiabetesacrosssectionalstudyinpaediatricdiabetesclinics
AT berberoglumerih systematicgenetictestingforrecessivelyinheritedmonogenicdiabetesacrosssectionalstudyinpaediatricdiabetesclinics
AT demirkorcan systematicgenetictestingforrecessivelyinheritedmonogenicdiabetesacrosssectionalstudyinpaediatricdiabetesclinics
AT catligonul systematicgenetictestingforrecessivelyinheritedmonogenicdiabetesacrosssectionalstudyinpaediatricdiabetesclinics
AT basserpil systematicgenetictestingforrecessivelyinheritedmonogenicdiabetesacrosssectionalstudyinpaediatricdiabetesclinics
AT akcayteoman systematicgenetictestingforrecessivelyinheritedmonogenicdiabetesacrosssectionalstudyinpaediatricdiabetesclinics
AT demirbilekhuseyin systematicgenetictestingforrecessivelyinheritedmonogenicdiabetesacrosssectionalstudyinpaediatricdiabetesclinics
AT weedonmichaeln systematicgenetictestingforrecessivelyinheritedmonogenicdiabetesacrosssectionalstudyinpaediatricdiabetesclinics
AT hattersleyandrewt systematicgenetictestingforrecessivelyinheritedmonogenicdiabetesacrosssectionalstudyinpaediatricdiabetesclinics