Cargando…

Measuring Health Equity in Emergency Care Using Routinely Collected Data: A Systematic Review

Introduction: Achieving equity in health care remains a challenge for health care systems worldwide and marked inequities in access and quality of care persist. Identifying health care equity indicators is an important first step in integrating the concept of equity into assessments of health care s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Morisod, Kevin, Luta, Xhyljeta, Marti, Joachim, Spycher, Jacques, Malebranche, Mary, Bodenmann, Patrick
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8742300/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35018313
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/heq.2021.0035
_version_ 1784629683014336512
author Morisod, Kevin
Luta, Xhyljeta
Marti, Joachim
Spycher, Jacques
Malebranche, Mary
Bodenmann, Patrick
author_facet Morisod, Kevin
Luta, Xhyljeta
Marti, Joachim
Spycher, Jacques
Malebranche, Mary
Bodenmann, Patrick
author_sort Morisod, Kevin
collection PubMed
description Introduction: Achieving equity in health care remains a challenge for health care systems worldwide and marked inequities in access and quality of care persist. Identifying health care equity indicators is an important first step in integrating the concept of equity into assessments of health care system performance, particularly in emergency care. Methods: We conducted a systematic review of administrative data-derived health care equity indicators and their association with socioeconomic determinants of health (SEDH) in emergency care settings. Following PRISMA-Equity reporting guidelines, Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, and Web of Science were searched for relevant studies. The outcomes of interest were indicators of health care equity and the associated SEDH they examine. Results: Among 29 studies identified, 14 equity indicators were identified and grouped into four categories that reflect the patient emergency care pathway. Total emergency department (ED) visits and ambulatory care-sensitive condition-related ED visits were the two most frequently used equity indicators. The studies analyzed equity based on seven SEDH: social deprivation, income, education level, social class, insurance coverage, health literacy, and financial and nonfinancial barriers. Despite some conflicting results, all identified SEDH are associated with inequalities in access to and use of emergency care. Conclusion: The use of administrative data-derived indicators in combination with identified SEDH could improve the measurement of health care equity in emergency care settings across health care systems worldwide. Using a combination of indicators is likely to lead to a more comprehensive, well-rounded measurement of health care equity than using any one indicator in isolation. Although studies analyzed focused on emergency care settings, it seems possible to extrapolate these indicators to measure equity in other areas of the health care system. Further studies elucidating root causes of health inequities in and outside the health care system are needed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8742300
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87423002022-01-10 Measuring Health Equity in Emergency Care Using Routinely Collected Data: A Systematic Review Morisod, Kevin Luta, Xhyljeta Marti, Joachim Spycher, Jacques Malebranche, Mary Bodenmann, Patrick Health Equity Review Article Introduction: Achieving equity in health care remains a challenge for health care systems worldwide and marked inequities in access and quality of care persist. Identifying health care equity indicators is an important first step in integrating the concept of equity into assessments of health care system performance, particularly in emergency care. Methods: We conducted a systematic review of administrative data-derived health care equity indicators and their association with socioeconomic determinants of health (SEDH) in emergency care settings. Following PRISMA-Equity reporting guidelines, Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, and Web of Science were searched for relevant studies. The outcomes of interest were indicators of health care equity and the associated SEDH they examine. Results: Among 29 studies identified, 14 equity indicators were identified and grouped into four categories that reflect the patient emergency care pathway. Total emergency department (ED) visits and ambulatory care-sensitive condition-related ED visits were the two most frequently used equity indicators. The studies analyzed equity based on seven SEDH: social deprivation, income, education level, social class, insurance coverage, health literacy, and financial and nonfinancial barriers. Despite some conflicting results, all identified SEDH are associated with inequalities in access to and use of emergency care. Conclusion: The use of administrative data-derived indicators in combination with identified SEDH could improve the measurement of health care equity in emergency care settings across health care systems worldwide. Using a combination of indicators is likely to lead to a more comprehensive, well-rounded measurement of health care equity than using any one indicator in isolation. Although studies analyzed focused on emergency care settings, it seems possible to extrapolate these indicators to measure equity in other areas of the health care system. Further studies elucidating root causes of health inequities in and outside the health care system are needed. Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers 2021-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8742300/ /pubmed/35018313 http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/heq.2021.0035 Text en © Kevin Morisod et al., 2021; Published by Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons License [CC-BY] (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Morisod, Kevin
Luta, Xhyljeta
Marti, Joachim
Spycher, Jacques
Malebranche, Mary
Bodenmann, Patrick
Measuring Health Equity in Emergency Care Using Routinely Collected Data: A Systematic Review
title Measuring Health Equity in Emergency Care Using Routinely Collected Data: A Systematic Review
title_full Measuring Health Equity in Emergency Care Using Routinely Collected Data: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Measuring Health Equity in Emergency Care Using Routinely Collected Data: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Measuring Health Equity in Emergency Care Using Routinely Collected Data: A Systematic Review
title_short Measuring Health Equity in Emergency Care Using Routinely Collected Data: A Systematic Review
title_sort measuring health equity in emergency care using routinely collected data: a systematic review
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8742300/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35018313
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/heq.2021.0035
work_keys_str_mv AT morisodkevin measuringhealthequityinemergencycareusingroutinelycollecteddataasystematicreview
AT lutaxhyljeta measuringhealthequityinemergencycareusingroutinelycollecteddataasystematicreview
AT martijoachim measuringhealthequityinemergencycareusingroutinelycollecteddataasystematicreview
AT spycherjacques measuringhealthequityinemergencycareusingroutinelycollecteddataasystematicreview
AT malebranchemary measuringhealthequityinemergencycareusingroutinelycollecteddataasystematicreview
AT bodenmannpatrick measuringhealthequityinemergencycareusingroutinelycollecteddataasystematicreview