Cargando…
PACK-CXL vs. antimicrobial therapy for bacterial, fungal, and mixed infectious keratitis: a prospective randomized phase 3 trial
BACKGROUND: Infectious keratitis is a major cause of global blindness. We tested whether standalone photoactivated chromophore corneal cross-linking (PACK-CXL) may be an effective first-line treatment in early to moderate infectious keratitis, compared with standard antimicrobial treatment. METHODS:...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8742313/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34996516 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40662-021-00272-0 |
_version_ | 1784629685108342784 |
---|---|
author | Hafezi, Farhad Hosny, Mohammed Shetty, Rohit Knyazer, Boris Chen, Shihao Wang, Qinmei Hashemi, Hassan Torres-Netto, Emilio A. |
author_facet | Hafezi, Farhad Hosny, Mohammed Shetty, Rohit Knyazer, Boris Chen, Shihao Wang, Qinmei Hashemi, Hassan Torres-Netto, Emilio A. |
author_sort | Hafezi, Farhad |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Infectious keratitis is a major cause of global blindness. We tested whether standalone photoactivated chromophore corneal cross-linking (PACK-CXL) may be an effective first-line treatment in early to moderate infectious keratitis, compared with standard antimicrobial treatment. METHODS: This is a randomized, controlled, multinational phase 3 clinical trial. Participants in five centers in Egypt, India, Iran, Israel, and China, aged ≥ 18 years, with infectious keratitis of presumed bacterial, fungal, or mixed origin, were randomly assigned (1:1) to PACK-CXL, or antimicrobial therapy. Outcomes measures included healing, defined as time to re-epithelialization of the corneal epithelial defect in the absence of inflammatory activity in the anterior chamber and clearance of stromal infiltrates. Treatment success was defined as the complete resolution of signs of infection. RESULTS: Between July 21, 2016, and March 4, 2020, participants were randomly assigned to receive PACK-CXL (n = 18) or antimicrobial therapy per American Academy of Ophthalmology (AAO) guidelines (n = 21). No participants were lost to follow-up. Four eyes were excluded from the epithelialization time analysis due to treatment failure: two in the antimicrobial therapy group, and two in the PACK-CXL group. Success rates were 88.9% (16/18 patients) in the PACK-CXL group and 90.5% (19/21 patients) in the medication group. There was no significant difference in time to complete corneal re-epithelialization (P = 0.828) between both treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: PACK-CXL may be an alternative to antimicrobial drugs for first-line and standalone treatment of early to moderate infectious keratitis of bacterial or fungal origin. Trial registration This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, trial registration number: NCT02717871 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40662-021-00272-0. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8742313 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87423132022-01-10 PACK-CXL vs. antimicrobial therapy for bacterial, fungal, and mixed infectious keratitis: a prospective randomized phase 3 trial Hafezi, Farhad Hosny, Mohammed Shetty, Rohit Knyazer, Boris Chen, Shihao Wang, Qinmei Hashemi, Hassan Torres-Netto, Emilio A. Eye Vis (Lond) Research BACKGROUND: Infectious keratitis is a major cause of global blindness. We tested whether standalone photoactivated chromophore corneal cross-linking (PACK-CXL) may be an effective first-line treatment in early to moderate infectious keratitis, compared with standard antimicrobial treatment. METHODS: This is a randomized, controlled, multinational phase 3 clinical trial. Participants in five centers in Egypt, India, Iran, Israel, and China, aged ≥ 18 years, with infectious keratitis of presumed bacterial, fungal, or mixed origin, were randomly assigned (1:1) to PACK-CXL, or antimicrobial therapy. Outcomes measures included healing, defined as time to re-epithelialization of the corneal epithelial defect in the absence of inflammatory activity in the anterior chamber and clearance of stromal infiltrates. Treatment success was defined as the complete resolution of signs of infection. RESULTS: Between July 21, 2016, and March 4, 2020, participants were randomly assigned to receive PACK-CXL (n = 18) or antimicrobial therapy per American Academy of Ophthalmology (AAO) guidelines (n = 21). No participants were lost to follow-up. Four eyes were excluded from the epithelialization time analysis due to treatment failure: two in the antimicrobial therapy group, and two in the PACK-CXL group. Success rates were 88.9% (16/18 patients) in the PACK-CXL group and 90.5% (19/21 patients) in the medication group. There was no significant difference in time to complete corneal re-epithelialization (P = 0.828) between both treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: PACK-CXL may be an alternative to antimicrobial drugs for first-line and standalone treatment of early to moderate infectious keratitis of bacterial or fungal origin. Trial registration This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, trial registration number: NCT02717871 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40662-021-00272-0. BioMed Central 2022-01-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8742313/ /pubmed/34996516 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40662-021-00272-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Hafezi, Farhad Hosny, Mohammed Shetty, Rohit Knyazer, Boris Chen, Shihao Wang, Qinmei Hashemi, Hassan Torres-Netto, Emilio A. PACK-CXL vs. antimicrobial therapy for bacterial, fungal, and mixed infectious keratitis: a prospective randomized phase 3 trial |
title | PACK-CXL vs. antimicrobial therapy for bacterial, fungal, and mixed infectious keratitis: a prospective randomized phase 3 trial |
title_full | PACK-CXL vs. antimicrobial therapy for bacterial, fungal, and mixed infectious keratitis: a prospective randomized phase 3 trial |
title_fullStr | PACK-CXL vs. antimicrobial therapy for bacterial, fungal, and mixed infectious keratitis: a prospective randomized phase 3 trial |
title_full_unstemmed | PACK-CXL vs. antimicrobial therapy for bacterial, fungal, and mixed infectious keratitis: a prospective randomized phase 3 trial |
title_short | PACK-CXL vs. antimicrobial therapy for bacterial, fungal, and mixed infectious keratitis: a prospective randomized phase 3 trial |
title_sort | pack-cxl vs. antimicrobial therapy for bacterial, fungal, and mixed infectious keratitis: a prospective randomized phase 3 trial |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8742313/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34996516 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40662-021-00272-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hafezifarhad packcxlvsantimicrobialtherapyforbacterialfungalandmixedinfectiouskeratitisaprospectiverandomizedphase3trial AT hosnymohammed packcxlvsantimicrobialtherapyforbacterialfungalandmixedinfectiouskeratitisaprospectiverandomizedphase3trial AT shettyrohit packcxlvsantimicrobialtherapyforbacterialfungalandmixedinfectiouskeratitisaprospectiverandomizedphase3trial AT knyazerboris packcxlvsantimicrobialtherapyforbacterialfungalandmixedinfectiouskeratitisaprospectiverandomizedphase3trial AT chenshihao packcxlvsantimicrobialtherapyforbacterialfungalandmixedinfectiouskeratitisaprospectiverandomizedphase3trial AT wangqinmei packcxlvsantimicrobialtherapyforbacterialfungalandmixedinfectiouskeratitisaprospectiverandomizedphase3trial AT hashemihassan packcxlvsantimicrobialtherapyforbacterialfungalandmixedinfectiouskeratitisaprospectiverandomizedphase3trial AT torresnettoemilioa packcxlvsantimicrobialtherapyforbacterialfungalandmixedinfectiouskeratitisaprospectiverandomizedphase3trial AT packcxlvsantimicrobialtherapyforbacterialfungalandmixedinfectiouskeratitisaprospectiverandomizedphase3trial |