Cargando…

Fixation of intraoperative proximal femoral fractures during THA using two versus three cerclage wires - a biomechanical study

BACKGROUND: Intraoperative proximal femoral fractures (IPFF) are relevant complications during total hip arthroplasty. Fixation using cerclage wires (CW) represents a minimally-invasive technique to address these fractures through the same surgical approach. The goal of treatment is to mobilise the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wendler, Toni, Edel, Melanie, Möbius, Robert, Fakler, Johannes, Osterhoff, Georg, Zajonz, Dirk
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8742345/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34996409
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04956-5
_version_ 1784629692729393152
author Wendler, Toni
Edel, Melanie
Möbius, Robert
Fakler, Johannes
Osterhoff, Georg
Zajonz, Dirk
author_facet Wendler, Toni
Edel, Melanie
Möbius, Robert
Fakler, Johannes
Osterhoff, Georg
Zajonz, Dirk
author_sort Wendler, Toni
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Intraoperative proximal femoral fractures (IPFF) are relevant complications during total hip arthroplasty. Fixation using cerclage wires (CW) represents a minimally-invasive technique to address these fractures through the same surgical approach. The goal of treatment is to mobilise the patient as early as possible, which requires high primary stability. This study aimed to compare different cerclage wire configurations fixing IPFF with regard to biomechanical primary stability. METHODS: Standardised IPFF (type II, Modified Mallory Classification) were created in human fresh frozen femora and were fixed either by two or three CW (1.6 mm, stainless steel). All cadaveric specimens (n = 42) were randomised to different groups (quasi-static, dynamic) or subgroups (2 CW, 3 CW) stratified by bone mineral density determined by Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry. Using a biomechanical testing setup, quasi-static and dynamic cyclic failure tests were carried out. Cyclic loading started from 200 N to 500 N at 1 Hz with increasing peak load by 250 N every 100 cycles until failure occurred or maximum load (5250 N) reached. The change of fracture gap size was optically captured. RESULTS: No significant differences in failure load after quasi-static (p = 0.701) or dynamic cyclic loading (p = 0.132) were found between the experimental groups. In the quasi-static load testing, all constructs resisted 250% of the body weight (BW) of their corresponding body donor. In the dynamic cyclic load testing, all but one construct (treated by 3 CW) resisted 250% BW. CONCLUSIONS: Based on this in vitro data, both two and three CW provided sufficient primary stability according to the predefined minimum failure load (250% BW) to resist. The authors recommend the treatment using two CW because it reduces the risk of vascular injury and shortens procedure time. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12891-021-04956-5.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8742345
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87423452022-01-10 Fixation of intraoperative proximal femoral fractures during THA using two versus three cerclage wires - a biomechanical study Wendler, Toni Edel, Melanie Möbius, Robert Fakler, Johannes Osterhoff, Georg Zajonz, Dirk BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: Intraoperative proximal femoral fractures (IPFF) are relevant complications during total hip arthroplasty. Fixation using cerclage wires (CW) represents a minimally-invasive technique to address these fractures through the same surgical approach. The goal of treatment is to mobilise the patient as early as possible, which requires high primary stability. This study aimed to compare different cerclage wire configurations fixing IPFF with regard to biomechanical primary stability. METHODS: Standardised IPFF (type II, Modified Mallory Classification) were created in human fresh frozen femora and were fixed either by two or three CW (1.6 mm, stainless steel). All cadaveric specimens (n = 42) were randomised to different groups (quasi-static, dynamic) or subgroups (2 CW, 3 CW) stratified by bone mineral density determined by Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry. Using a biomechanical testing setup, quasi-static and dynamic cyclic failure tests were carried out. Cyclic loading started from 200 N to 500 N at 1 Hz with increasing peak load by 250 N every 100 cycles until failure occurred or maximum load (5250 N) reached. The change of fracture gap size was optically captured. RESULTS: No significant differences in failure load after quasi-static (p = 0.701) or dynamic cyclic loading (p = 0.132) were found between the experimental groups. In the quasi-static load testing, all constructs resisted 250% of the body weight (BW) of their corresponding body donor. In the dynamic cyclic load testing, all but one construct (treated by 3 CW) resisted 250% BW. CONCLUSIONS: Based on this in vitro data, both two and three CW provided sufficient primary stability according to the predefined minimum failure load (250% BW) to resist. The authors recommend the treatment using two CW because it reduces the risk of vascular injury and shortens procedure time. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12891-021-04956-5. BioMed Central 2022-01-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8742345/ /pubmed/34996409 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04956-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Wendler, Toni
Edel, Melanie
Möbius, Robert
Fakler, Johannes
Osterhoff, Georg
Zajonz, Dirk
Fixation of intraoperative proximal femoral fractures during THA using two versus three cerclage wires - a biomechanical study
title Fixation of intraoperative proximal femoral fractures during THA using two versus three cerclage wires - a biomechanical study
title_full Fixation of intraoperative proximal femoral fractures during THA using two versus three cerclage wires - a biomechanical study
title_fullStr Fixation of intraoperative proximal femoral fractures during THA using two versus three cerclage wires - a biomechanical study
title_full_unstemmed Fixation of intraoperative proximal femoral fractures during THA using two versus three cerclage wires - a biomechanical study
title_short Fixation of intraoperative proximal femoral fractures during THA using two versus three cerclage wires - a biomechanical study
title_sort fixation of intraoperative proximal femoral fractures during tha using two versus three cerclage wires - a biomechanical study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8742345/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34996409
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04956-5
work_keys_str_mv AT wendlertoni fixationofintraoperativeproximalfemoralfracturesduringthausingtwoversusthreecerclagewiresabiomechanicalstudy
AT edelmelanie fixationofintraoperativeproximalfemoralfracturesduringthausingtwoversusthreecerclagewiresabiomechanicalstudy
AT mobiusrobert fixationofintraoperativeproximalfemoralfracturesduringthausingtwoversusthreecerclagewiresabiomechanicalstudy
AT faklerjohannes fixationofintraoperativeproximalfemoralfracturesduringthausingtwoversusthreecerclagewiresabiomechanicalstudy
AT osterhoffgeorg fixationofintraoperativeproximalfemoralfracturesduringthausingtwoversusthreecerclagewiresabiomechanicalstudy
AT zajonzdirk fixationofintraoperativeproximalfemoralfracturesduringthausingtwoversusthreecerclagewiresabiomechanicalstudy