Cargando…

Shear bond strength of ceramic laminate veneers to finishing surfaces with different percentages of preserved enamel under a digital guided method

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the effect of the percentages of preserved enamel on ceramic laminate veneers’ (CLVs) shear bond strength (SBS). METHODS: Seventy extracted human maxillary central incisors were scanned and reconstructed into three-dimensional models. Th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhu, Jiakang, Gao, Jing, Jia, Luming, Tan, Xin, Xie, Chenyang, Yu, Haiyang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8742459/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34996438
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-021-02038-5
_version_ 1784629717636218880
author Zhu, Jiakang
Gao, Jing
Jia, Luming
Tan, Xin
Xie, Chenyang
Yu, Haiyang
author_facet Zhu, Jiakang
Gao, Jing
Jia, Luming
Tan, Xin
Xie, Chenyang
Yu, Haiyang
author_sort Zhu, Jiakang
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the effect of the percentages of preserved enamel on ceramic laminate veneers’ (CLVs) shear bond strength (SBS). METHODS: Seventy extracted human maxillary central incisors were scanned and reconstructed into three-dimensional models. The extracted teeth were then embedded and randomly divided into seven groups (n = 10 per group). Based on digital analyses of the three-dimensional models, guided tooth preparation and bonding procedures were performed individually to form seven different percentages (100%, 80%, 60% 50%, 40%, 20% and 0%) of remaining enamel thickness on the bonding surface. Finally, the SBS test was performed, and the data were statistically analysed by one-way ANOVA with LSD post hoc test (α = 0.05). RESULTS: The complete enamel surface exhibited the highest SBS (19.93 ± 4.55 MPa), followed by 80% enamel (19.03 ± 3.66 MPa), 60% enamel (18.44 ± 3.65 MPa), 50% enamel (18.18 ± 3.41 MPa), 40% enamel (17.83 ± 3.01 MPa) and 20% enamel (11.32 ± 3.42 MPa) group. The lowest SBS (9.63 ± 3.46 MPa) was detected in 0% enamel group. No significant difference was observed among the 40–100% enamel groups, while the 20% or 0% enamel group demonstrated a significantly lower mean SBS than the 40% enamel group (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The SBS value of CLVs bonded to 100% enamel on the finishing surfaces (nearly 20 MPa) was twice that which bonded to 0% enamel (nearly 10 MPa). Bonding to 100% enamel is the most reliable treatment. When dentin exposure is inevitable, enamel should be preserved as much as possible to maintain good bonding. In addition, 40% of preserved enamel on the bonding surface was the minimal acceptable value to fulfil the requirements of good bonding strength.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8742459
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87424592022-01-10 Shear bond strength of ceramic laminate veneers to finishing surfaces with different percentages of preserved enamel under a digital guided method Zhu, Jiakang Gao, Jing Jia, Luming Tan, Xin Xie, Chenyang Yu, Haiyang BMC Oral Health Research BACKGROUND: The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the effect of the percentages of preserved enamel on ceramic laminate veneers’ (CLVs) shear bond strength (SBS). METHODS: Seventy extracted human maxillary central incisors were scanned and reconstructed into three-dimensional models. The extracted teeth were then embedded and randomly divided into seven groups (n = 10 per group). Based on digital analyses of the three-dimensional models, guided tooth preparation and bonding procedures were performed individually to form seven different percentages (100%, 80%, 60% 50%, 40%, 20% and 0%) of remaining enamel thickness on the bonding surface. Finally, the SBS test was performed, and the data were statistically analysed by one-way ANOVA with LSD post hoc test (α = 0.05). RESULTS: The complete enamel surface exhibited the highest SBS (19.93 ± 4.55 MPa), followed by 80% enamel (19.03 ± 3.66 MPa), 60% enamel (18.44 ± 3.65 MPa), 50% enamel (18.18 ± 3.41 MPa), 40% enamel (17.83 ± 3.01 MPa) and 20% enamel (11.32 ± 3.42 MPa) group. The lowest SBS (9.63 ± 3.46 MPa) was detected in 0% enamel group. No significant difference was observed among the 40–100% enamel groups, while the 20% or 0% enamel group demonstrated a significantly lower mean SBS than the 40% enamel group (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The SBS value of CLVs bonded to 100% enamel on the finishing surfaces (nearly 20 MPa) was twice that which bonded to 0% enamel (nearly 10 MPa). Bonding to 100% enamel is the most reliable treatment. When dentin exposure is inevitable, enamel should be preserved as much as possible to maintain good bonding. In addition, 40% of preserved enamel on the bonding surface was the minimal acceptable value to fulfil the requirements of good bonding strength. BioMed Central 2022-01-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8742459/ /pubmed/34996438 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-021-02038-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Zhu, Jiakang
Gao, Jing
Jia, Luming
Tan, Xin
Xie, Chenyang
Yu, Haiyang
Shear bond strength of ceramic laminate veneers to finishing surfaces with different percentages of preserved enamel under a digital guided method
title Shear bond strength of ceramic laminate veneers to finishing surfaces with different percentages of preserved enamel under a digital guided method
title_full Shear bond strength of ceramic laminate veneers to finishing surfaces with different percentages of preserved enamel under a digital guided method
title_fullStr Shear bond strength of ceramic laminate veneers to finishing surfaces with different percentages of preserved enamel under a digital guided method
title_full_unstemmed Shear bond strength of ceramic laminate veneers to finishing surfaces with different percentages of preserved enamel under a digital guided method
title_short Shear bond strength of ceramic laminate veneers to finishing surfaces with different percentages of preserved enamel under a digital guided method
title_sort shear bond strength of ceramic laminate veneers to finishing surfaces with different percentages of preserved enamel under a digital guided method
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8742459/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34996438
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-021-02038-5
work_keys_str_mv AT zhujiakang shearbondstrengthofceramiclaminateveneerstofinishingsurfaceswithdifferentpercentagesofpreservedenamelunderadigitalguidedmethod
AT gaojing shearbondstrengthofceramiclaminateveneerstofinishingsurfaceswithdifferentpercentagesofpreservedenamelunderadigitalguidedmethod
AT jialuming shearbondstrengthofceramiclaminateveneerstofinishingsurfaceswithdifferentpercentagesofpreservedenamelunderadigitalguidedmethod
AT tanxin shearbondstrengthofceramiclaminateveneerstofinishingsurfaceswithdifferentpercentagesofpreservedenamelunderadigitalguidedmethod
AT xiechenyang shearbondstrengthofceramiclaminateveneerstofinishingsurfaceswithdifferentpercentagesofpreservedenamelunderadigitalguidedmethod
AT yuhaiyang shearbondstrengthofceramiclaminateveneerstofinishingsurfaceswithdifferentpercentagesofpreservedenamelunderadigitalguidedmethod