Cargando…
Diaphragm Ultrasound is an Imaging Biomarker that Distinguishes Exacerbation Status from Stable Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
BACKGROUND: Evaluating the diaphragm muscle in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is important. However, the role of diaphragm ultrasound (DUS) in distinguishing the exacerbation status of COPD (AECOPD) is not fully understood. We set this study to evaluate the role of DUS as a biomarker f...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8742578/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35018095 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S341484 |
Sumario: | BACKGROUND: Evaluating the diaphragm muscle in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is important. However, the role of diaphragm ultrasound (DUS) in distinguishing the exacerbation status of COPD (AECOPD) is not fully understood. We set this study to evaluate the role of DUS as a biomarker for distinguishing the AECOPD. METHODS: COPD patients who underwent DUS were enrolled between March 2020 and November 2020. The diaphragm thickening fraction (TF(max)) and diaphragm excursion (DE(max)) during maximal deep breathing were measured. Patients were divided into exacerbation and stable groups. Demographics, lung function, and DUS findings were compared between the two groups. Receiver operating characteristic curve and univariate/multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed. RESULTS: Fifty-five patients were enrolled. The exacerbation group had a lower body mass index (BMI) (20.9 vs 24.2, p = 0.003), lower TF(max) (94.8 ± 8.2% vs 158.4 ± 83.5%, p = 0.010), and lower DE(max) (30.8 ± 11.1 mm vs 40.5 ± 12.5 mm, p = 0.007) compared to stable group. The areas under the TF(max) (0.745) and DE(max) (0.721) curves indicated fair results for distinguishing AECOPD. The patients were divided into low and high TF(max) and DE(max) groups based on calculated cut-off values. Low TF(max) (odds ratio [OR] 8.40; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.55–45.56) and low DE(max) (OR 11.51; 95% CI 1.15–115.56) were associated with AECOPD after adjusting for age, sex, BMI, and lung functions. CONCLUSION: DUS showed the possibility of an imaging biomarker distinguishing AECOPD from stable status. |
---|