Cargando…

The V6-V1 interpeak interval: a novel criterion for the diagnosis of left bundle branch capture

AIMS: We hypothesized that during left bundle branch (LBB) area pacing, the various possible combinations of direct capture/non-capture of the septal myocardium and the LBB result in distinct patterns of right and left ventricular activation. This could translate into different combinations of R-wav...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jastrzębski, Marek, Burri, Haran, Kiełbasa, Grzegorz, Curila, Karol, Moskal, Paweł, Bednarek, Agnieszka, Rajzer, Marek, Vijayaraman, Pugazhendhi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8742628/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34255038
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/euab164
Descripción
Sumario:AIMS: We hypothesized that during left bundle branch (LBB) area pacing, the various possible combinations of direct capture/non-capture of the septal myocardium and the LBB result in distinct patterns of right and left ventricular activation. This could translate into different combinations of R-wave peak time (RWPT) in V(1) and V(6). Consequently, the V(6)-V(1) interpeak interval could differentiate the three types of LBB area capture: non-selective (ns-)LBB, selective (s-)LBB, and left ventricular septal (LVS). METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients with unquestionable evidence of LBB capture were included. The V(6)-V(1) interpeak interval, V(6)RWPT, and V(1)RWPT were compared between different types of LBB area capture. A total of 468 patients from two centres were screened, with 124 patients (239 electrocardiograms) included in the analysis. Loss of LVS capture resulted in an increase in V(1)RWPT by ≥15 ms but did not impact V(6)RWPT. Loss of LBB capture resulted in an increase in V(6)RWPT by ≥15 ms but only minimally influenced V(1)RWPT. Consequently, the V(6)-V(1) interval was longest during s-LBB capture (62.3 ± 21.4 ms), intermediate during ns-LBB capture (41.3 ± 14.0 ms), and shortest during LVS capture (26.5 ± 8.6 ms). The optimal value of the V(6)-V(1) interval value for the differentiation between ns-LBB and LVS capture was 33 ms (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 84.7%). A specificity of 100% for the diagnosis of LBB capture was obtained with a cut-off value of >44 ms. CONCLUSION: The V(6)-V(1) interpeak interval is a promising novel criterion for the diagnosis of LBB area capture.