Cargando…
Evaluation of atezolizumab immunogenicity: Clinical pharmacology (part 1)
Baseline patient characteristics and prognostic factors are important considerations in oncology when evaluating the impact of immunogenicity on pharmacokinetics (PK) and efficacy. Here, we assessed the impact of anti‐drug antibodies (ADA) on the PK of the immune checkpoint inhibitor atezolizumab (a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8742635/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34432389 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cts.13127 |
_version_ | 1784629758626103296 |
---|---|
author | Wu, Benjamin Sternheim, Nitzan Agarwal, Priya Suchomel, Julia Vadhavkar, Shweta Bruno, Rene Ballinger, Marcus Bernaards, Coen A. Chan, Phyllis Ruppel, Jane Jin, Jin Girish, Sandhya Joshi, Amita Quarmby, Valerie |
author_facet | Wu, Benjamin Sternheim, Nitzan Agarwal, Priya Suchomel, Julia Vadhavkar, Shweta Bruno, Rene Ballinger, Marcus Bernaards, Coen A. Chan, Phyllis Ruppel, Jane Jin, Jin Girish, Sandhya Joshi, Amita Quarmby, Valerie |
author_sort | Wu, Benjamin |
collection | PubMed |
description | Baseline patient characteristics and prognostic factors are important considerations in oncology when evaluating the impact of immunogenicity on pharmacokinetics (PK) and efficacy. Here, we assessed the impact of anti‐drug antibodies (ADA) on the PK of the immune checkpoint inhibitor atezolizumab (an anti–PD‐L1 monoclonal antibody). We evaluated data from ≈ 4500 patients from 12 clinical trials across different tumor types, treatment settings, and dosing regimens. In our dataset, ~ 30% of patients (range, 13–54%) developed treatment‐emergent ADA, and in vitro neutralizing antibodies (NAb) were seen in ~ 50% of ADA‐positive (+) patients. Pooled time course data showed a trend toward lower atezolizumab exposure in ADA+ patients, which was more pronounced in ADA+/NAb+ patients. However, the atezolizumab concentration distributions overlapped, and drug concentrations exceeded 6 µg/ml, the target concentration required for receptor saturation, in greater than 95% of patients. Patients had sufficient exposure regardless of ADA status. The dose selected to allow for dosing over effects from ADA resulted in a flat exposure‐response relationship. Analysis of study results by ADA titer showed that exposure and overall survival were not affected in a clinically meaningful way. High tumor burden, low albumin, and high CRP at baseline showed the greatest association with ADA development but not with subsequent NAb development. These imbalanced factors at baseline can confound analysis of ADA impact. ADA increases atezolizumab clearance minimally (9%), and its impact on exposure based on the totality of the clinical pharmacology assessment does not appear to be clinically meaningful. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8742635 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87426352022-01-12 Evaluation of atezolizumab immunogenicity: Clinical pharmacology (part 1) Wu, Benjamin Sternheim, Nitzan Agarwal, Priya Suchomel, Julia Vadhavkar, Shweta Bruno, Rene Ballinger, Marcus Bernaards, Coen A. Chan, Phyllis Ruppel, Jane Jin, Jin Girish, Sandhya Joshi, Amita Quarmby, Valerie Clin Transl Sci Research Baseline patient characteristics and prognostic factors are important considerations in oncology when evaluating the impact of immunogenicity on pharmacokinetics (PK) and efficacy. Here, we assessed the impact of anti‐drug antibodies (ADA) on the PK of the immune checkpoint inhibitor atezolizumab (an anti–PD‐L1 monoclonal antibody). We evaluated data from ≈ 4500 patients from 12 clinical trials across different tumor types, treatment settings, and dosing regimens. In our dataset, ~ 30% of patients (range, 13–54%) developed treatment‐emergent ADA, and in vitro neutralizing antibodies (NAb) were seen in ~ 50% of ADA‐positive (+) patients. Pooled time course data showed a trend toward lower atezolizumab exposure in ADA+ patients, which was more pronounced in ADA+/NAb+ patients. However, the atezolizumab concentration distributions overlapped, and drug concentrations exceeded 6 µg/ml, the target concentration required for receptor saturation, in greater than 95% of patients. Patients had sufficient exposure regardless of ADA status. The dose selected to allow for dosing over effects from ADA resulted in a flat exposure‐response relationship. Analysis of study results by ADA titer showed that exposure and overall survival were not affected in a clinically meaningful way. High tumor burden, low albumin, and high CRP at baseline showed the greatest association with ADA development but not with subsequent NAb development. These imbalanced factors at baseline can confound analysis of ADA impact. ADA increases atezolizumab clearance minimally (9%), and its impact on exposure based on the totality of the clinical pharmacology assessment does not appear to be clinically meaningful. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-08-25 2022-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8742635/ /pubmed/34432389 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cts.13127 Text en © 2021 Genentech Inc/Roche. Clinical and Translational Science published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of the American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Research Wu, Benjamin Sternheim, Nitzan Agarwal, Priya Suchomel, Julia Vadhavkar, Shweta Bruno, Rene Ballinger, Marcus Bernaards, Coen A. Chan, Phyllis Ruppel, Jane Jin, Jin Girish, Sandhya Joshi, Amita Quarmby, Valerie Evaluation of atezolizumab immunogenicity: Clinical pharmacology (part 1) |
title | Evaluation of atezolizumab immunogenicity: Clinical pharmacology (part 1) |
title_full | Evaluation of atezolizumab immunogenicity: Clinical pharmacology (part 1) |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of atezolizumab immunogenicity: Clinical pharmacology (part 1) |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of atezolizumab immunogenicity: Clinical pharmacology (part 1) |
title_short | Evaluation of atezolizumab immunogenicity: Clinical pharmacology (part 1) |
title_sort | evaluation of atezolizumab immunogenicity: clinical pharmacology (part 1) |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8742635/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34432389 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cts.13127 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wubenjamin evaluationofatezolizumabimmunogenicityclinicalpharmacologypart1 AT sternheimnitzan evaluationofatezolizumabimmunogenicityclinicalpharmacologypart1 AT agarwalpriya evaluationofatezolizumabimmunogenicityclinicalpharmacologypart1 AT suchomeljulia evaluationofatezolizumabimmunogenicityclinicalpharmacologypart1 AT vadhavkarshweta evaluationofatezolizumabimmunogenicityclinicalpharmacologypart1 AT brunorene evaluationofatezolizumabimmunogenicityclinicalpharmacologypart1 AT ballingermarcus evaluationofatezolizumabimmunogenicityclinicalpharmacologypart1 AT bernaardscoena evaluationofatezolizumabimmunogenicityclinicalpharmacologypart1 AT chanphyllis evaluationofatezolizumabimmunogenicityclinicalpharmacologypart1 AT ruppeljane evaluationofatezolizumabimmunogenicityclinicalpharmacologypart1 AT jinjin evaluationofatezolizumabimmunogenicityclinicalpharmacologypart1 AT girishsandhya evaluationofatezolizumabimmunogenicityclinicalpharmacologypart1 AT joshiamita evaluationofatezolizumabimmunogenicityclinicalpharmacologypart1 AT quarmbyvalerie evaluationofatezolizumabimmunogenicityclinicalpharmacologypart1 |