Cargando…
Combined in-vitro and on-farm evaluation of commercial disinfectants used against Brachyspira hyodysenteriae
BACKGROUND: Swine dysentery (SD) is a severe infectious disease with a relevant impact on pig production usually caused by Brachyspira hyodysenteriae, although B. hampsonii causes an identical clinical picture. SD control relies on antimicrobials, good management practices and strict biosecurity wit...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8742949/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34998431 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40813-021-00244-9 |
_version_ | 1784629809527128064 |
---|---|
author | Gómez-García, Manuel Argüello, Héctor Pérez-Pérez, Lucía Vega, Clara Puente, Héctor Mencía-Ares, Óscar Rubio, Pedro Carvajal, Ana |
author_facet | Gómez-García, Manuel Argüello, Héctor Pérez-Pérez, Lucía Vega, Clara Puente, Héctor Mencía-Ares, Óscar Rubio, Pedro Carvajal, Ana |
author_sort | Gómez-García, Manuel |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Swine dysentery (SD) is a severe infectious disease with a relevant impact on pig production usually caused by Brachyspira hyodysenteriae, although B. hampsonii causes an identical clinical picture. SD control relies on antimicrobials, good management practices and strict biosecurity with cleaning and disinfection as crucial tools to avoid the pathogen transmission. This study evaluates the in-vitro efficacy of an array of commercial disinfectants against a collection of B. hyodysenteriae isolates using broth tests. The efficacy of cleaning and disinfection protocols was also evaluated on two farms with endemic SD using surface swabs collected in emptied pens before and after cleaning and disinfection procedures, using both real-time PCR and bacterial microbiological culture. RESULTS: Most of the commercial disinfectants evaluated were effective against all B. hyodysenteriae isolates tested, with a reduction of more than 5.00 log(10) CFU/mL (bactericidal efficacy of 99.999%). However, some isolates exhibited reduced susceptibility to Virkon-S and Limoseptic disinfectants. The evaluation of cleaning and disinfection protocols on farms with SD outbreaks showed that approximately half the pens tested (n = 25) were positive by real-time PCR after pigs removal (mean B. hyodysenteriae counts 5.72 ± 1.04 log(10) CFU/mL) while almost 20% of the pens remained positive after cleaning (n = 7) and disinfection (n = 5) procedures although with significantly lower, mean estimates (4.31 ± 0.43 log(10) CFU/mL and 4.01 ± 0.55 log(10) CFU/mL, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: These results show the efficacy of disinfectants against B. hyodysenteriae but also stress the need to implement adequately the cleaning and disinfection protocols on pig farms and review and revise their efficiency periodically. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8742949 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87429492022-01-10 Combined in-vitro and on-farm evaluation of commercial disinfectants used against Brachyspira hyodysenteriae Gómez-García, Manuel Argüello, Héctor Pérez-Pérez, Lucía Vega, Clara Puente, Héctor Mencía-Ares, Óscar Rubio, Pedro Carvajal, Ana Porcine Health Manag Research BACKGROUND: Swine dysentery (SD) is a severe infectious disease with a relevant impact on pig production usually caused by Brachyspira hyodysenteriae, although B. hampsonii causes an identical clinical picture. SD control relies on antimicrobials, good management practices and strict biosecurity with cleaning and disinfection as crucial tools to avoid the pathogen transmission. This study evaluates the in-vitro efficacy of an array of commercial disinfectants against a collection of B. hyodysenteriae isolates using broth tests. The efficacy of cleaning and disinfection protocols was also evaluated on two farms with endemic SD using surface swabs collected in emptied pens before and after cleaning and disinfection procedures, using both real-time PCR and bacterial microbiological culture. RESULTS: Most of the commercial disinfectants evaluated were effective against all B. hyodysenteriae isolates tested, with a reduction of more than 5.00 log(10) CFU/mL (bactericidal efficacy of 99.999%). However, some isolates exhibited reduced susceptibility to Virkon-S and Limoseptic disinfectants. The evaluation of cleaning and disinfection protocols on farms with SD outbreaks showed that approximately half the pens tested (n = 25) were positive by real-time PCR after pigs removal (mean B. hyodysenteriae counts 5.72 ± 1.04 log(10) CFU/mL) while almost 20% of the pens remained positive after cleaning (n = 7) and disinfection (n = 5) procedures although with significantly lower, mean estimates (4.31 ± 0.43 log(10) CFU/mL and 4.01 ± 0.55 log(10) CFU/mL, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: These results show the efficacy of disinfectants against B. hyodysenteriae but also stress the need to implement adequately the cleaning and disinfection protocols on pig farms and review and revise their efficiency periodically. BioMed Central 2022-01-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8742949/ /pubmed/34998431 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40813-021-00244-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Gómez-García, Manuel Argüello, Héctor Pérez-Pérez, Lucía Vega, Clara Puente, Héctor Mencía-Ares, Óscar Rubio, Pedro Carvajal, Ana Combined in-vitro and on-farm evaluation of commercial disinfectants used against Brachyspira hyodysenteriae |
title | Combined in-vitro and on-farm evaluation of commercial disinfectants used against Brachyspira hyodysenteriae |
title_full | Combined in-vitro and on-farm evaluation of commercial disinfectants used against Brachyspira hyodysenteriae |
title_fullStr | Combined in-vitro and on-farm evaluation of commercial disinfectants used against Brachyspira hyodysenteriae |
title_full_unstemmed | Combined in-vitro and on-farm evaluation of commercial disinfectants used against Brachyspira hyodysenteriae |
title_short | Combined in-vitro and on-farm evaluation of commercial disinfectants used against Brachyspira hyodysenteriae |
title_sort | combined in-vitro and on-farm evaluation of commercial disinfectants used against brachyspira hyodysenteriae |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8742949/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34998431 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40813-021-00244-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gomezgarciamanuel combinedinvitroandonfarmevaluationofcommercialdisinfectantsusedagainstbrachyspirahyodysenteriae AT arguellohector combinedinvitroandonfarmevaluationofcommercialdisinfectantsusedagainstbrachyspirahyodysenteriae AT perezperezlucia combinedinvitroandonfarmevaluationofcommercialdisinfectantsusedagainstbrachyspirahyodysenteriae AT vegaclara combinedinvitroandonfarmevaluationofcommercialdisinfectantsusedagainstbrachyspirahyodysenteriae AT puentehector combinedinvitroandonfarmevaluationofcommercialdisinfectantsusedagainstbrachyspirahyodysenteriae AT menciaaresoscar combinedinvitroandonfarmevaluationofcommercialdisinfectantsusedagainstbrachyspirahyodysenteriae AT rubiopedro combinedinvitroandonfarmevaluationofcommercialdisinfectantsusedagainstbrachyspirahyodysenteriae AT carvajalana combinedinvitroandonfarmevaluationofcommercialdisinfectantsusedagainstbrachyspirahyodysenteriae |