Cargando…

Impact of COVID-19 on Radiology Residency Selection Process: A Survey of Radiology Residency Programs in the US

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Virtual residency interviews have become crucial in maintaining CDC-recommended precautionary measures throughout the ongoing COVID-era. However, scant literature exists regarding the direct impact the pandemic has had on the radiology program selection process, including p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jones, Henderson M., Ankem, Akhila, Seroogy, Erik A., Kalantar, Alborz, Goldsmith, Dylan C., Rizenbergs, Kyle C., Van Meter, Tracy L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Association of University Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8743012/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35125277
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2021.12.033
_version_ 1784629819136278528
author Jones, Henderson M.
Ankem, Akhila
Seroogy, Erik A.
Kalantar, Alborz
Goldsmith, Dylan C.
Rizenbergs, Kyle C.
Van Meter, Tracy L.
author_facet Jones, Henderson M.
Ankem, Akhila
Seroogy, Erik A.
Kalantar, Alborz
Goldsmith, Dylan C.
Rizenbergs, Kyle C.
Van Meter, Tracy L.
author_sort Jones, Henderson M.
collection PubMed
description RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Virtual residency interviews have become crucial in maintaining CDC-recommended precautionary measures throughout the ongoing COVID-era. However, scant literature exists regarding the direct impact the pandemic has had on the radiology program selection process, including preferred modalities of residency interviews and social media utilization. This survey aimed to understand how radiology programs adapted to changes in the 2020–2021 virtual application cycle. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 32-question survey was distributed to 194 residency programs between July and August of 2021. Data were analyzed primarily by using descriptive statistics and Paired Student's T-testing. RESULTS: A total of 31 programs completed the survey, yielding a response rate of 16%. When queried about the perceived success of virtual interviews during the 2020–2021 application cycle, 21 programs (68%) said the new interview format was very successful. Twenty-seven of the programs (87%) believed they were able to adequately gauge applicants through virtual interviews. However, when surveyed about personal preferences for interviews, the responses were more evenly distributed between virtual (11/31, 35%) and in-person (14/31, 45%). Pre-COVID, the top three criteria programs used to rank candidates were USMLE Step 1 score (20/31, 65%), letters of recommendation (17/31, 55%), and MSPE (12/31, 39%). Within the virtual, COVID-19 era, these criteria remained statistically unchanged (p = 0.22): USMLE Step 1 score (21/31, 68%), letters of recommendation (17/31, 55%), and MSPE (14/31, 45%). About half of programs who had not previously utilized social media (12 of 23, 52%) created accounts, mostly via Twitter or Instagram. CONCLUSION: The primary findings indicate that programs perceived success with virtually interviewing and ranking applicants, the criteria to rank applicants remain unchanged despite the virtual environment, and programs’ social media utilization increased.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8743012
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher The Association of University Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87430122022-01-10 Impact of COVID-19 on Radiology Residency Selection Process: A Survey of Radiology Residency Programs in the US Jones, Henderson M. Ankem, Akhila Seroogy, Erik A. Kalantar, Alborz Goldsmith, Dylan C. Rizenbergs, Kyle C. Van Meter, Tracy L. Acad Radiol Original Investigation RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Virtual residency interviews have become crucial in maintaining CDC-recommended precautionary measures throughout the ongoing COVID-era. However, scant literature exists regarding the direct impact the pandemic has had on the radiology program selection process, including preferred modalities of residency interviews and social media utilization. This survey aimed to understand how radiology programs adapted to changes in the 2020–2021 virtual application cycle. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 32-question survey was distributed to 194 residency programs between July and August of 2021. Data were analyzed primarily by using descriptive statistics and Paired Student's T-testing. RESULTS: A total of 31 programs completed the survey, yielding a response rate of 16%. When queried about the perceived success of virtual interviews during the 2020–2021 application cycle, 21 programs (68%) said the new interview format was very successful. Twenty-seven of the programs (87%) believed they were able to adequately gauge applicants through virtual interviews. However, when surveyed about personal preferences for interviews, the responses were more evenly distributed between virtual (11/31, 35%) and in-person (14/31, 45%). Pre-COVID, the top three criteria programs used to rank candidates were USMLE Step 1 score (20/31, 65%), letters of recommendation (17/31, 55%), and MSPE (12/31, 39%). Within the virtual, COVID-19 era, these criteria remained statistically unchanged (p = 0.22): USMLE Step 1 score (21/31, 68%), letters of recommendation (17/31, 55%), and MSPE (14/31, 45%). About half of programs who had not previously utilized social media (12 of 23, 52%) created accounts, mostly via Twitter or Instagram. CONCLUSION: The primary findings indicate that programs perceived success with virtually interviewing and ranking applicants, the criteria to rank applicants remain unchanged despite the virtual environment, and programs’ social media utilization increased. The Association of University Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Inc. 2022-05 2022-01-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8743012/ /pubmed/35125277 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2021.12.033 Text en © 2022 The Association of University Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Original Investigation
Jones, Henderson M.
Ankem, Akhila
Seroogy, Erik A.
Kalantar, Alborz
Goldsmith, Dylan C.
Rizenbergs, Kyle C.
Van Meter, Tracy L.
Impact of COVID-19 on Radiology Residency Selection Process: A Survey of Radiology Residency Programs in the US
title Impact of COVID-19 on Radiology Residency Selection Process: A Survey of Radiology Residency Programs in the US
title_full Impact of COVID-19 on Radiology Residency Selection Process: A Survey of Radiology Residency Programs in the US
title_fullStr Impact of COVID-19 on Radiology Residency Selection Process: A Survey of Radiology Residency Programs in the US
title_full_unstemmed Impact of COVID-19 on Radiology Residency Selection Process: A Survey of Radiology Residency Programs in the US
title_short Impact of COVID-19 on Radiology Residency Selection Process: A Survey of Radiology Residency Programs in the US
title_sort impact of covid-19 on radiology residency selection process: a survey of radiology residency programs in the us
topic Original Investigation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8743012/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35125277
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2021.12.033
work_keys_str_mv AT joneshendersonm impactofcovid19onradiologyresidencyselectionprocessasurveyofradiologyresidencyprogramsintheus
AT ankemakhila impactofcovid19onradiologyresidencyselectionprocessasurveyofradiologyresidencyprogramsintheus
AT seroogyerika impactofcovid19onradiologyresidencyselectionprocessasurveyofradiologyresidencyprogramsintheus
AT kalantaralborz impactofcovid19onradiologyresidencyselectionprocessasurveyofradiologyresidencyprogramsintheus
AT goldsmithdylanc impactofcovid19onradiologyresidencyselectionprocessasurveyofradiologyresidencyprogramsintheus
AT rizenbergskylec impactofcovid19onradiologyresidencyselectionprocessasurveyofradiologyresidencyprogramsintheus
AT vanmetertracyl impactofcovid19onradiologyresidencyselectionprocessasurveyofradiologyresidencyprogramsintheus