Cargando…
Impact of COVID-19 on Radiology Residency Selection Process: A Survey of Radiology Residency Programs in the US
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Virtual residency interviews have become crucial in maintaining CDC-recommended precautionary measures throughout the ongoing COVID-era. However, scant literature exists regarding the direct impact the pandemic has had on the radiology program selection process, including p...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Association of University Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8743012/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35125277 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2021.12.033 |
_version_ | 1784629819136278528 |
---|---|
author | Jones, Henderson M. Ankem, Akhila Seroogy, Erik A. Kalantar, Alborz Goldsmith, Dylan C. Rizenbergs, Kyle C. Van Meter, Tracy L. |
author_facet | Jones, Henderson M. Ankem, Akhila Seroogy, Erik A. Kalantar, Alborz Goldsmith, Dylan C. Rizenbergs, Kyle C. Van Meter, Tracy L. |
author_sort | Jones, Henderson M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Virtual residency interviews have become crucial in maintaining CDC-recommended precautionary measures throughout the ongoing COVID-era. However, scant literature exists regarding the direct impact the pandemic has had on the radiology program selection process, including preferred modalities of residency interviews and social media utilization. This survey aimed to understand how radiology programs adapted to changes in the 2020–2021 virtual application cycle. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 32-question survey was distributed to 194 residency programs between July and August of 2021. Data were analyzed primarily by using descriptive statistics and Paired Student's T-testing. RESULTS: A total of 31 programs completed the survey, yielding a response rate of 16%. When queried about the perceived success of virtual interviews during the 2020–2021 application cycle, 21 programs (68%) said the new interview format was very successful. Twenty-seven of the programs (87%) believed they were able to adequately gauge applicants through virtual interviews. However, when surveyed about personal preferences for interviews, the responses were more evenly distributed between virtual (11/31, 35%) and in-person (14/31, 45%). Pre-COVID, the top three criteria programs used to rank candidates were USMLE Step 1 score (20/31, 65%), letters of recommendation (17/31, 55%), and MSPE (12/31, 39%). Within the virtual, COVID-19 era, these criteria remained statistically unchanged (p = 0.22): USMLE Step 1 score (21/31, 68%), letters of recommendation (17/31, 55%), and MSPE (14/31, 45%). About half of programs who had not previously utilized social media (12 of 23, 52%) created accounts, mostly via Twitter or Instagram. CONCLUSION: The primary findings indicate that programs perceived success with virtually interviewing and ranking applicants, the criteria to rank applicants remain unchanged despite the virtual environment, and programs’ social media utilization increased. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8743012 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | The Association of University Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87430122022-01-10 Impact of COVID-19 on Radiology Residency Selection Process: A Survey of Radiology Residency Programs in the US Jones, Henderson M. Ankem, Akhila Seroogy, Erik A. Kalantar, Alborz Goldsmith, Dylan C. Rizenbergs, Kyle C. Van Meter, Tracy L. Acad Radiol Original Investigation RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Virtual residency interviews have become crucial in maintaining CDC-recommended precautionary measures throughout the ongoing COVID-era. However, scant literature exists regarding the direct impact the pandemic has had on the radiology program selection process, including preferred modalities of residency interviews and social media utilization. This survey aimed to understand how radiology programs adapted to changes in the 2020–2021 virtual application cycle. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 32-question survey was distributed to 194 residency programs between July and August of 2021. Data were analyzed primarily by using descriptive statistics and Paired Student's T-testing. RESULTS: A total of 31 programs completed the survey, yielding a response rate of 16%. When queried about the perceived success of virtual interviews during the 2020–2021 application cycle, 21 programs (68%) said the new interview format was very successful. Twenty-seven of the programs (87%) believed they were able to adequately gauge applicants through virtual interviews. However, when surveyed about personal preferences for interviews, the responses were more evenly distributed between virtual (11/31, 35%) and in-person (14/31, 45%). Pre-COVID, the top three criteria programs used to rank candidates were USMLE Step 1 score (20/31, 65%), letters of recommendation (17/31, 55%), and MSPE (12/31, 39%). Within the virtual, COVID-19 era, these criteria remained statistically unchanged (p = 0.22): USMLE Step 1 score (21/31, 68%), letters of recommendation (17/31, 55%), and MSPE (14/31, 45%). About half of programs who had not previously utilized social media (12 of 23, 52%) created accounts, mostly via Twitter or Instagram. CONCLUSION: The primary findings indicate that programs perceived success with virtually interviewing and ranking applicants, the criteria to rank applicants remain unchanged despite the virtual environment, and programs’ social media utilization increased. The Association of University Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Inc. 2022-05 2022-01-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8743012/ /pubmed/35125277 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2021.12.033 Text en © 2022 The Association of University Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Original Investigation Jones, Henderson M. Ankem, Akhila Seroogy, Erik A. Kalantar, Alborz Goldsmith, Dylan C. Rizenbergs, Kyle C. Van Meter, Tracy L. Impact of COVID-19 on Radiology Residency Selection Process: A Survey of Radiology Residency Programs in the US |
title | Impact of COVID-19 on Radiology Residency Selection Process: A Survey of Radiology Residency Programs in the US |
title_full | Impact of COVID-19 on Radiology Residency Selection Process: A Survey of Radiology Residency Programs in the US |
title_fullStr | Impact of COVID-19 on Radiology Residency Selection Process: A Survey of Radiology Residency Programs in the US |
title_full_unstemmed | Impact of COVID-19 on Radiology Residency Selection Process: A Survey of Radiology Residency Programs in the US |
title_short | Impact of COVID-19 on Radiology Residency Selection Process: A Survey of Radiology Residency Programs in the US |
title_sort | impact of covid-19 on radiology residency selection process: a survey of radiology residency programs in the us |
topic | Original Investigation |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8743012/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35125277 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2021.12.033 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT joneshendersonm impactofcovid19onradiologyresidencyselectionprocessasurveyofradiologyresidencyprogramsintheus AT ankemakhila impactofcovid19onradiologyresidencyselectionprocessasurveyofradiologyresidencyprogramsintheus AT seroogyerika impactofcovid19onradiologyresidencyselectionprocessasurveyofradiologyresidencyprogramsintheus AT kalantaralborz impactofcovid19onradiologyresidencyselectionprocessasurveyofradiologyresidencyprogramsintheus AT goldsmithdylanc impactofcovid19onradiologyresidencyselectionprocessasurveyofradiologyresidencyprogramsintheus AT rizenbergskylec impactofcovid19onradiologyresidencyselectionprocessasurveyofradiologyresidencyprogramsintheus AT vanmetertracyl impactofcovid19onradiologyresidencyselectionprocessasurveyofradiologyresidencyprogramsintheus |