Cargando…

Are models better read on paper or on screen? A comparative study

Is it really better to print everything, including software models, or is it better to view them on screen? With the ever increasing complexity of software systems, software modeling is integral to software development. Software models facilitate and automate many activities during development, such...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: El-Attar, Mohamed
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8743026/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35035345
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10270-021-00966-y
_version_ 1784629822664736768
author El-Attar, Mohamed
author_facet El-Attar, Mohamed
author_sort El-Attar, Mohamed
collection PubMed
description Is it really better to print everything, including software models, or is it better to view them on screen? With the ever increasing complexity of software systems, software modeling is integral to software development. Software models facilitate and automate many activities during development, such as code and test case generation. However, a core goal of software modeling is to communicate and collaborate. Software models are presented to team members on many mediums and two of the most common mediums are paper and computer screens. Reading from paper or screen is ostensibly considered to have the same effect on model comprehension. However, the literature on text reading has indicated that the reading experiences can be very different which in turn effects various metrics related to reader performance. This paper reports on an experiment that was conducted to investigate the effect of reading software models on paper in comparison with reading them on a computer screen with respect to cognitive effectiveness. Cognitive effectiveness here refers to the ease by which a model reader can read a model. The experiment used a total of 74 software engineering students as subjects. The experiment results provide strong evidence that displaying diagrams on a screen allows subjects to read them quicker. There is also evidence that indicates that on screen viewing induces fewer reading errors.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8743026
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87430262022-01-10 Are models better read on paper or on screen? A comparative study El-Attar, Mohamed Softw Syst Model Regular Paper Is it really better to print everything, including software models, or is it better to view them on screen? With the ever increasing complexity of software systems, software modeling is integral to software development. Software models facilitate and automate many activities during development, such as code and test case generation. However, a core goal of software modeling is to communicate and collaborate. Software models are presented to team members on many mediums and two of the most common mediums are paper and computer screens. Reading from paper or screen is ostensibly considered to have the same effect on model comprehension. However, the literature on text reading has indicated that the reading experiences can be very different which in turn effects various metrics related to reader performance. This paper reports on an experiment that was conducted to investigate the effect of reading software models on paper in comparison with reading them on a computer screen with respect to cognitive effectiveness. Cognitive effectiveness here refers to the ease by which a model reader can read a model. The experiment used a total of 74 software engineering students as subjects. The experiment results provide strong evidence that displaying diagrams on a screen allows subjects to read them quicker. There is also evidence that indicates that on screen viewing induces fewer reading errors. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-01-09 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8743026/ /pubmed/35035345 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10270-021-00966-y Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2022 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Regular Paper
El-Attar, Mohamed
Are models better read on paper or on screen? A comparative study
title Are models better read on paper or on screen? A comparative study
title_full Are models better read on paper or on screen? A comparative study
title_fullStr Are models better read on paper or on screen? A comparative study
title_full_unstemmed Are models better read on paper or on screen? A comparative study
title_short Are models better read on paper or on screen? A comparative study
title_sort are models better read on paper or on screen? a comparative study
topic Regular Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8743026/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35035345
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10270-021-00966-y
work_keys_str_mv AT elattarmohamed aremodelsbetterreadonpaperoronscreenacomparativestudy