Cargando…

Intervention usage for the management of low back pain in a chiropractic teaching clinic

BACKGROUND: Despite numerous low back pain (LBP) clinical practice guidelines, published studies suggest guideline nonconcordant care is still offered. However, there is limited literature evaluating the degree to which chiropractors, particularly students, follow clinical practice guidelines when m...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Csiernik, Ben, Smith, Ali, Plener, Joshua, Tibbles, Anthony, Young, James J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8743057/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35000607
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12998-022-00412-w
_version_ 1784629827025764352
author Csiernik, Ben
Smith, Ali
Plener, Joshua
Tibbles, Anthony
Young, James J.
author_facet Csiernik, Ben
Smith, Ali
Plener, Joshua
Tibbles, Anthony
Young, James J.
author_sort Csiernik, Ben
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Despite numerous low back pain (LBP) clinical practice guidelines, published studies suggest guideline nonconcordant care is still offered. However, there is limited literature evaluating the degree to which chiropractors, particularly students, follow clinical practice guidelines when managing LBP. The aim of this study was to evaluate the frequency of use of specific interventions for LBP by students at a chiropractic teaching clinic, mapping recommended, not recommend, and without recommendation interventions based on two clinical practice guidelines. METHODS: This was a retrospective chart review of patients presenting to the Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College teaching clinic with a new complaint of LBP from January to July 2019. Interventions provided under treatment plans for each patient were extracted. Interventions were classified as recommended, not recommended, or without recommendation according to two guidelines, the NICE and OPTIMa LBP guideline. RESULTS: 1000 patient files were identified with 377 files meeting the inclusion criteria. The most frequent interventions provided to patients were manipulation/mobilization (99%) and soft tissue therapy (91%). Exercise, localized percussion, and advice and/or education were included in just under half of the treatment plans. Patient files contained similar amounts of recommended (70%) and not recommended (80%) interventions according to the NICE guideline classification, with half the treatment plans including an intervention without recommendation. Under the OPTIMa acute guideline, patient files contained similar amounts of recommended and not recommended care, while more recommended care was provided than not recommended under the OPTIMa chronic guideline. CONCLUSIONS: Despite chiropractic interns providing guideline concordant care for the majority of LBP patients, interventions classified as not recommended and without recommendation are still frequently offered. This study provides a starting point to understand the treatment interventions provided by chiropractic interns. Further research should be conducted to improve our understanding of the use of LBP guideline recommended care in the chiropractic profession. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Open Science Framework # g74e8.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8743057
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87430572022-01-10 Intervention usage for the management of low back pain in a chiropractic teaching clinic Csiernik, Ben Smith, Ali Plener, Joshua Tibbles, Anthony Young, James J. Chiropr Man Therap Research BACKGROUND: Despite numerous low back pain (LBP) clinical practice guidelines, published studies suggest guideline nonconcordant care is still offered. However, there is limited literature evaluating the degree to which chiropractors, particularly students, follow clinical practice guidelines when managing LBP. The aim of this study was to evaluate the frequency of use of specific interventions for LBP by students at a chiropractic teaching clinic, mapping recommended, not recommend, and without recommendation interventions based on two clinical practice guidelines. METHODS: This was a retrospective chart review of patients presenting to the Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College teaching clinic with a new complaint of LBP from January to July 2019. Interventions provided under treatment plans for each patient were extracted. Interventions were classified as recommended, not recommended, or without recommendation according to two guidelines, the NICE and OPTIMa LBP guideline. RESULTS: 1000 patient files were identified with 377 files meeting the inclusion criteria. The most frequent interventions provided to patients were manipulation/mobilization (99%) and soft tissue therapy (91%). Exercise, localized percussion, and advice and/or education were included in just under half of the treatment plans. Patient files contained similar amounts of recommended (70%) and not recommended (80%) interventions according to the NICE guideline classification, with half the treatment plans including an intervention without recommendation. Under the OPTIMa acute guideline, patient files contained similar amounts of recommended and not recommended care, while more recommended care was provided than not recommended under the OPTIMa chronic guideline. CONCLUSIONS: Despite chiropractic interns providing guideline concordant care for the majority of LBP patients, interventions classified as not recommended and without recommendation are still frequently offered. This study provides a starting point to understand the treatment interventions provided by chiropractic interns. Further research should be conducted to improve our understanding of the use of LBP guideline recommended care in the chiropractic profession. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Open Science Framework # g74e8. BioMed Central 2022-01-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8743057/ /pubmed/35000607 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12998-022-00412-w Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Csiernik, Ben
Smith, Ali
Plener, Joshua
Tibbles, Anthony
Young, James J.
Intervention usage for the management of low back pain in a chiropractic teaching clinic
title Intervention usage for the management of low back pain in a chiropractic teaching clinic
title_full Intervention usage for the management of low back pain in a chiropractic teaching clinic
title_fullStr Intervention usage for the management of low back pain in a chiropractic teaching clinic
title_full_unstemmed Intervention usage for the management of low back pain in a chiropractic teaching clinic
title_short Intervention usage for the management of low back pain in a chiropractic teaching clinic
title_sort intervention usage for the management of low back pain in a chiropractic teaching clinic
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8743057/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35000607
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12998-022-00412-w
work_keys_str_mv AT csiernikben interventionusageforthemanagementoflowbackpaininachiropracticteachingclinic
AT smithali interventionusageforthemanagementoflowbackpaininachiropracticteachingclinic
AT plenerjoshua interventionusageforthemanagementoflowbackpaininachiropracticteachingclinic
AT tibblesanthony interventionusageforthemanagementoflowbackpaininachiropracticteachingclinic
AT youngjamesj interventionusageforthemanagementoflowbackpaininachiropracticteachingclinic