Cargando…
Is saliva collected passively without forceful coughing sensitive to detect SARS-CoV-2 in ambulatory cases? A systematic review
OBJECTIVE: This systematic review was conducted to assess the sensitivity rate of SARS-CoV-2 detection in the saliva of ambulatory asymptomatic and mildly symptomatic patients, with saliva being collected passively without any forceful coughing. STUDY DESIGN: A literature search was performed from J...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8743389/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35227640 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2022.01.002 |
_version_ | 1784629892727439360 |
---|---|
author | Ahmadieh, Azadeh Dincer, Sibel Navazesh, Mahvash |
author_facet | Ahmadieh, Azadeh Dincer, Sibel Navazesh, Mahvash |
author_sort | Ahmadieh, Azadeh |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: This systematic review was conducted to assess the sensitivity rate of SARS-CoV-2 detection in the saliva of ambulatory asymptomatic and mildly symptomatic patients, with saliva being collected passively without any forceful coughing. STUDY DESIGN: A literature search was performed from January 2020 to July 2021. Prospective studies excluding letters to editors were included in our review only if saliva and nasopharyngeal samples were collected simultaneously and sensitivity was reported using reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) in asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic ambulatory cases. RESULTS: A total of 436 studies were assessed; 10 (4 cohorts and 6 cross-sectional) studies met our inclusion criteria. The sensitivity rate of saliva to detect SARS-CoV-2 varied from 85.7% to 98.6% in all except for 3 studies. Lower sensitivity levels were attributed to low viral load (51.9% and 63.8%) or lack of supervision while collecting saliva (66.7%). CONCLUSIONS: Passively collected saliva in the absence of coughing has a high sensitivity rate to detect SARS-CoV-2 in asymptomatic and mildly symptomatic patients compared with nasopharyngeal swabs. Limitations of previous studies, such as lack of attention to the method of saliva collection, stages, and severity of the disease at the time of sample collection, can be researched in future investigations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8743389 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Elsevier Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87433892022-01-10 Is saliva collected passively without forceful coughing sensitive to detect SARS-CoV-2 in ambulatory cases? A systematic review Ahmadieh, Azadeh Dincer, Sibel Navazesh, Mahvash Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Review Article OBJECTIVE: This systematic review was conducted to assess the sensitivity rate of SARS-CoV-2 detection in the saliva of ambulatory asymptomatic and mildly symptomatic patients, with saliva being collected passively without any forceful coughing. STUDY DESIGN: A literature search was performed from January 2020 to July 2021. Prospective studies excluding letters to editors were included in our review only if saliva and nasopharyngeal samples were collected simultaneously and sensitivity was reported using reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) in asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic ambulatory cases. RESULTS: A total of 436 studies were assessed; 10 (4 cohorts and 6 cross-sectional) studies met our inclusion criteria. The sensitivity rate of saliva to detect SARS-CoV-2 varied from 85.7% to 98.6% in all except for 3 studies. Lower sensitivity levels were attributed to low viral load (51.9% and 63.8%) or lack of supervision while collecting saliva (66.7%). CONCLUSIONS: Passively collected saliva in the absence of coughing has a high sensitivity rate to detect SARS-CoV-2 in asymptomatic and mildly symptomatic patients compared with nasopharyngeal swabs. Limitations of previous studies, such as lack of attention to the method of saliva collection, stages, and severity of the disease at the time of sample collection, can be researched in future investigations. Elsevier Inc. 2022-05 2022-01-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8743389/ /pubmed/35227640 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2022.01.002 Text en © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Ahmadieh, Azadeh Dincer, Sibel Navazesh, Mahvash Is saliva collected passively without forceful coughing sensitive to detect SARS-CoV-2 in ambulatory cases? A systematic review |
title | Is saliva collected passively without forceful coughing sensitive to detect SARS-CoV-2 in ambulatory cases? A systematic review |
title_full | Is saliva collected passively without forceful coughing sensitive to detect SARS-CoV-2 in ambulatory cases? A systematic review |
title_fullStr | Is saliva collected passively without forceful coughing sensitive to detect SARS-CoV-2 in ambulatory cases? A systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Is saliva collected passively without forceful coughing sensitive to detect SARS-CoV-2 in ambulatory cases? A systematic review |
title_short | Is saliva collected passively without forceful coughing sensitive to detect SARS-CoV-2 in ambulatory cases? A systematic review |
title_sort | is saliva collected passively without forceful coughing sensitive to detect sars-cov-2 in ambulatory cases? a systematic review |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8743389/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35227640 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2022.01.002 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ahmadiehazadeh issalivacollectedpassivelywithoutforcefulcoughingsensitivetodetectsarscov2inambulatorycasesasystematicreview AT dincersibel issalivacollectedpassivelywithoutforcefulcoughingsensitivetodetectsarscov2inambulatorycasesasystematicreview AT navazeshmahvash issalivacollectedpassivelywithoutforcefulcoughingsensitivetodetectsarscov2inambulatorycasesasystematicreview |