Cargando…

Rolling Reviews During COVID-19: The European Union Experience in a Global Context

PURPOSE: Many regulators offered new ways of working to help combat the COVID-19 pandemic, and the rolling review procedure is an important and successful example. In rolling reviews, data are submitted and reviewed as they become available before the full data package is available. This approach is...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Marinus, Roelie, Mofid, Sarah, Mpandzou, Marya, Kühler, Thomas C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8743449/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35123802
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinthera.2022.01.001
_version_ 1784629907250216960
author Marinus, Roelie
Mofid, Sarah
Mpandzou, Marya
Kühler, Thomas C.
author_facet Marinus, Roelie
Mofid, Sarah
Mpandzou, Marya
Kühler, Thomas C.
author_sort Marinus, Roelie
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Many regulators offered new ways of working to help combat the COVID-19 pandemic, and the rolling review procedure is an important and successful example. In rolling reviews, data are submitted and reviewed as they become available before the full data package is available. This approach is resource intensive but faster than standard review processes and therefore of benefit to society and patients during a health emergency. In this study, we analyze the European Medicines Agency (EMA) rolling review process and extract learning, based on the vaccines and treatments that have been approved to date (November 2021), and formulate 3 suggestions for the future. METHODS: Data and information on rolling reviews and similar related processes were collected from health authority websites across the globe with a focus on the EMA. Literature searches in PubMed and checking company websites for additional information were conducted to complement and corroborate findings as required. FINDINGS: The duration of a rolling review cycle and the number of cycles before a conditional marketing authorization differ among different applications. Through the rolling review process, COVID-19 vaccines could be approved in record times, ranging from 17 to 36 days. The rolling review process is not limited to vaccines but is applied to promising treatments as well. IMPLICATIONS: This study indicates that rolling reviews can be successfully conducted during a health emergency, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, to meet an unmet medical need. Other critical conditions or life-threatening diseases with unmet needs exist and may be suitable to be addressed by a rolling review process to accelerate patient access to life-changing treatments. Indeed, we call for an evaluation of the rolling review process, its use, and its efficiency to capture learning with the aim of building a new, lean, and effective expedited review procedure that could be institutionalized and added to the regulatory toolbox.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8743449
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87434492022-01-10 Rolling Reviews During COVID-19: The European Union Experience in a Global Context Marinus, Roelie Mofid, Sarah Mpandzou, Marya Kühler, Thomas C. Clin Ther COVID Original Research PURPOSE: Many regulators offered new ways of working to help combat the COVID-19 pandemic, and the rolling review procedure is an important and successful example. In rolling reviews, data are submitted and reviewed as they become available before the full data package is available. This approach is resource intensive but faster than standard review processes and therefore of benefit to society and patients during a health emergency. In this study, we analyze the European Medicines Agency (EMA) rolling review process and extract learning, based on the vaccines and treatments that have been approved to date (November 2021), and formulate 3 suggestions for the future. METHODS: Data and information on rolling reviews and similar related processes were collected from health authority websites across the globe with a focus on the EMA. Literature searches in PubMed and checking company websites for additional information were conducted to complement and corroborate findings as required. FINDINGS: The duration of a rolling review cycle and the number of cycles before a conditional marketing authorization differ among different applications. Through the rolling review process, COVID-19 vaccines could be approved in record times, ranging from 17 to 36 days. The rolling review process is not limited to vaccines but is applied to promising treatments as well. IMPLICATIONS: This study indicates that rolling reviews can be successfully conducted during a health emergency, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, to meet an unmet medical need. Other critical conditions or life-threatening diseases with unmet needs exist and may be suitable to be addressed by a rolling review process to accelerate patient access to life-changing treatments. Indeed, we call for an evaluation of the rolling review process, its use, and its efficiency to capture learning with the aim of building a new, lean, and effective expedited review procedure that could be institutionalized and added to the regulatory toolbox. The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. 2022-03 2022-01-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8743449/ /pubmed/35123802 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinthera.2022.01.001 Text en © 2022 The Author(s) Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle COVID Original Research
Marinus, Roelie
Mofid, Sarah
Mpandzou, Marya
Kühler, Thomas C.
Rolling Reviews During COVID-19: The European Union Experience in a Global Context
title Rolling Reviews During COVID-19: The European Union Experience in a Global Context
title_full Rolling Reviews During COVID-19: The European Union Experience in a Global Context
title_fullStr Rolling Reviews During COVID-19: The European Union Experience in a Global Context
title_full_unstemmed Rolling Reviews During COVID-19: The European Union Experience in a Global Context
title_short Rolling Reviews During COVID-19: The European Union Experience in a Global Context
title_sort rolling reviews during covid-19: the european union experience in a global context
topic COVID Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8743449/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35123802
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinthera.2022.01.001
work_keys_str_mv AT marinusroelie rollingreviewsduringcovid19theeuropeanunionexperienceinaglobalcontext
AT mofidsarah rollingreviewsduringcovid19theeuropeanunionexperienceinaglobalcontext
AT mpandzoumarya rollingreviewsduringcovid19theeuropeanunionexperienceinaglobalcontext
AT kuhlerthomasc rollingreviewsduringcovid19theeuropeanunionexperienceinaglobalcontext