Cargando…

Voice parameters for difficult mask ventilation evaluation: an observational study

BACKGROUND: Mask ventilation (MV) is an essential component of airway management. Difficult mask ventilation (DMV) is a major cause for perioperative hypoxic brain injury; however, predicting DMV remains a challenge. This study aimed to determine the potential value of voice parameters as novel pred...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cao, Shuang, Xia, Ming, Zhou, Ren, Wang, Jie, Jin, Chen-Yu, Pei, Bei, Zhou, Zhi-Kai, Qian, Yan-Min, Jiang, Hong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8743704/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35071434
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-21-6274
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Mask ventilation (MV) is an essential component of airway management. Difficult mask ventilation (DMV) is a major cause for perioperative hypoxic brain injury; however, predicting DMV remains a challenge. This study aimed to determine the potential value of voice parameters as novel predictors of DMV in patients scheduled for general anesthesia. METHODS: We included 1,160 adult patients scheduled for elective surgery under general anesthesia. The clinical variables usually reported as predictors of DMV were collected before surgery. Voice sample of phonemes ([a], [o], [e], [i], [u], [ü], [ci], [qi], [chi], [le], [ke], and [en]) were recorded and their formants (f1–f4) and bandwidths (bw1-bw4) were extracted. The definition of DMV was the inability of an unassisted anesthesiologist to ensure adequate ventilation during MV under general anesthesia. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to explore the association between voice parameters and DMV. The predictive value of the voice parameters was evaluated by assessment of area under the curve (AUC) of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves of a stepwise forward model. RESULTS: The prevalence of DMV was 218/1,160 (18.8%). The AUC of the stepwise forward model (including o_f4, e_bw2, i_f3, u_pitch, u_f1, u_f4, ü_bw4, ci_f1, qi_f1, qi_f4, qi_bw4, chi_f1, chi_bw2, chi_bw4, le_pitch, le_bw3, ke_bw2, en_pitch, and en_f2, en_bw4) attained a value of 0.779. The sensitivity and specificity of the model were 75.0% and 71.0%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Voice parameters may be considered as alternative predictors of DMV, but additional studies are needed to confirm the initial findings.