Cargando…

Hemodynamic analysis and implantation strategies of delayed intracranial aneurysm rupture after flow diverter treatment

BACKGROUND: Delayed aneurysm rupture after flow diverters (FDs) is a serious complication which mechanism remains unclear. The hemodynamics of FDs with proximal or distal densification implantation strategies have rarely been reported. In this study, we investigated not only the hemodynamic factors...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Shiyao, Bai, Bin, Lv, Nan, Cheng, Yunzhang, Ji, Bin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8743709/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35071429
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-21-5939
_version_ 1784629965610811392
author Chen, Shiyao
Bai, Bin
Lv, Nan
Cheng, Yunzhang
Ji, Bin
author_facet Chen, Shiyao
Bai, Bin
Lv, Nan
Cheng, Yunzhang
Ji, Bin
author_sort Chen, Shiyao
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Delayed aneurysm rupture after flow diverters (FDs) is a serious complication which mechanism remains unclear. The hemodynamics of FDs with proximal or distal densification implantation strategies have rarely been reported. In this study, we investigated not only the hemodynamic factors involved in postoperative rupture, but also the hemodynamic effects of different FDs implantation strategies on avoiding this complication. METHODS: We selected 2 internal carotid artery (ICA) aneurysms with similar morphological characteristics, both of which were treated with FDs but had opposite therapeutic outcomes (Case 1, ruptured after FD treatment; Case 2, recovered). The FDs strategies we designed were strategy A [with homogeneous 30% metal coverage ratio (MCR)], strategy B (with distal densification of 40% and proximal 30% MCR) and strategy C (with proximal densification of 40% and distal 30% MCR). Virtually FDs deployment and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) method were performed to simulate FDs implantation strategies and analyze the hemodynamics associated with postoperative rupture. RESULTS: After FDs implantation, the velocity of blood entering the aneurysm decreased (Case 1, 25.4%; Case 2, 30.6%), but the inflow jet impingement still existed in Case 1. The overall WSS decreased similarly in both cases, but the high WSS region hardly diminished in Case 1. For overall wall pressure, Case 2 decreased slightly but increased in Case 1. Of the three FDs implantation strategies, strategy C had the best hemodynamic effects, including the maximum blood velocity reduction and a tendency to form a more stable flow pattern, the maximum reduction rate of overall WSS and the effective diminish of high WSS area as well as the overall decrease of wall pressure. CONCLUSIONS: Not significant decrease of blood flow velocity entering the aneurysm adding persistent impact of inflow jet impingement, high WSS area that did not diminish and abnormal increase of pressure on the aneurysm wall may be causative of postoperative rupture and bleeding of ICA aneurysms. In addition, the hemodynamic effects were favorable when the FD was improved to proximal densification, which may reduce the risk of delayed aneurysm rupture following FDs treatment. KEYWORDS: Delayed rupture; flow diverter (FD); computational fluid dynamics (CFD); intracranial aneurysm (IAs); internal carotid artery (ICA)
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8743709
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87437092022-01-21 Hemodynamic analysis and implantation strategies of delayed intracranial aneurysm rupture after flow diverter treatment Chen, Shiyao Bai, Bin Lv, Nan Cheng, Yunzhang Ji, Bin Ann Transl Med Original Article BACKGROUND: Delayed aneurysm rupture after flow diverters (FDs) is a serious complication which mechanism remains unclear. The hemodynamics of FDs with proximal or distal densification implantation strategies have rarely been reported. In this study, we investigated not only the hemodynamic factors involved in postoperative rupture, but also the hemodynamic effects of different FDs implantation strategies on avoiding this complication. METHODS: We selected 2 internal carotid artery (ICA) aneurysms with similar morphological characteristics, both of which were treated with FDs but had opposite therapeutic outcomes (Case 1, ruptured after FD treatment; Case 2, recovered). The FDs strategies we designed were strategy A [with homogeneous 30% metal coverage ratio (MCR)], strategy B (with distal densification of 40% and proximal 30% MCR) and strategy C (with proximal densification of 40% and distal 30% MCR). Virtually FDs deployment and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) method were performed to simulate FDs implantation strategies and analyze the hemodynamics associated with postoperative rupture. RESULTS: After FDs implantation, the velocity of blood entering the aneurysm decreased (Case 1, 25.4%; Case 2, 30.6%), but the inflow jet impingement still existed in Case 1. The overall WSS decreased similarly in both cases, but the high WSS region hardly diminished in Case 1. For overall wall pressure, Case 2 decreased slightly but increased in Case 1. Of the three FDs implantation strategies, strategy C had the best hemodynamic effects, including the maximum blood velocity reduction and a tendency to form a more stable flow pattern, the maximum reduction rate of overall WSS and the effective diminish of high WSS area as well as the overall decrease of wall pressure. CONCLUSIONS: Not significant decrease of blood flow velocity entering the aneurysm adding persistent impact of inflow jet impingement, high WSS area that did not diminish and abnormal increase of pressure on the aneurysm wall may be causative of postoperative rupture and bleeding of ICA aneurysms. In addition, the hemodynamic effects were favorable when the FD was improved to proximal densification, which may reduce the risk of delayed aneurysm rupture following FDs treatment. KEYWORDS: Delayed rupture; flow diverter (FD); computational fluid dynamics (CFD); intracranial aneurysm (IAs); internal carotid artery (ICA) AME Publishing Company 2021-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8743709/ /pubmed/35071429 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-21-5939 Text en 2021 Annals of Translational Medicine. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Chen, Shiyao
Bai, Bin
Lv, Nan
Cheng, Yunzhang
Ji, Bin
Hemodynamic analysis and implantation strategies of delayed intracranial aneurysm rupture after flow diverter treatment
title Hemodynamic analysis and implantation strategies of delayed intracranial aneurysm rupture after flow diverter treatment
title_full Hemodynamic analysis and implantation strategies of delayed intracranial aneurysm rupture after flow diverter treatment
title_fullStr Hemodynamic analysis and implantation strategies of delayed intracranial aneurysm rupture after flow diverter treatment
title_full_unstemmed Hemodynamic analysis and implantation strategies of delayed intracranial aneurysm rupture after flow diverter treatment
title_short Hemodynamic analysis and implantation strategies of delayed intracranial aneurysm rupture after flow diverter treatment
title_sort hemodynamic analysis and implantation strategies of delayed intracranial aneurysm rupture after flow diverter treatment
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8743709/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35071429
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-21-5939
work_keys_str_mv AT chenshiyao hemodynamicanalysisandimplantationstrategiesofdelayedintracranialaneurysmruptureafterflowdivertertreatment
AT baibin hemodynamicanalysisandimplantationstrategiesofdelayedintracranialaneurysmruptureafterflowdivertertreatment
AT lvnan hemodynamicanalysisandimplantationstrategiesofdelayedintracranialaneurysmruptureafterflowdivertertreatment
AT chengyunzhang hemodynamicanalysisandimplantationstrategiesofdelayedintracranialaneurysmruptureafterflowdivertertreatment
AT jibin hemodynamicanalysisandimplantationstrategiesofdelayedintracranialaneurysmruptureafterflowdivertertreatment