Cargando…

A radiomics model combined with XGBoost may improve the accuracy of distinguishing between mediastinal cysts and tumors: a multicenter validation analysis

BACKGROUND: Mediastinal cysts (MCs) can be misdiagnosed as mediastinal tumors (MTs) such as thymomas on the basis of radiological examinations, including computerized tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Our study aimed to determine the utility of a radiomics model combined with eXt...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Xing, You, Xiaofang, Zhang, Li, Huang, Dayu, Aramini, Beatrice, Shabaturov, Leonid, Jiang, Gening, Fan, Jiang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8743732/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35071431
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-21-5999
_version_ 1784629973685895168
author Wang, Xing
You, Xiaofang
Zhang, Li
Huang, Dayu
Aramini, Beatrice
Shabaturov, Leonid
Jiang, Gening
Fan, Jiang
author_facet Wang, Xing
You, Xiaofang
Zhang, Li
Huang, Dayu
Aramini, Beatrice
Shabaturov, Leonid
Jiang, Gening
Fan, Jiang
author_sort Wang, Xing
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Mediastinal cysts (MCs) can be misdiagnosed as mediastinal tumors (MTs) such as thymomas on the basis of radiological examinations, including computerized tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Our study aimed to determine the utility of a radiomics model combined with eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) for diagnosing anterior mediastinal masses. METHODS: Patients with anterior mediastinal lesions admitted to Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital between October 2014 and January 2018 were enrolled in the study. Mediastinal lesions were sketched on each CT image frame using OsiriX workstation. The study involved a total of 592 patients (289 male/303 female; age range, 18–83 years) with anterior mediastinal lesions (322 MCs and 270 MTs). Previously collected training data was used to build an XGBoost model to classify MCs and MTs, and a prospectively collected training dataset and external data from Huashan Hospital were used for validation. The SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) method was used to help understand the complex model. RESULTS: The XGBoost model was established using 107 selected radiomic features, and an accuracy of 0.972 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.948–0.995] was achieved compared to 0.820 for radiologists. For lesions smaller than 2 cm, XGBoost model accuracy reduced slightly to 0.835, while the accuracy of radiologists was only 0.667. The model accuracy also achieved 0.910 when validated using an independent external dataset containing 87 cases. SHAP analysis suggested the 90% percentile Hounsfield unit value as a promising diagnostic parameter. CONCLUSIONS: Our combined radiomics and XGBoost model significantly increased the accuracy of distinguishing between MCs and MTs compared to the level of accuracy obtained by radiologists.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8743732
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87437322022-01-21 A radiomics model combined with XGBoost may improve the accuracy of distinguishing between mediastinal cysts and tumors: a multicenter validation analysis Wang, Xing You, Xiaofang Zhang, Li Huang, Dayu Aramini, Beatrice Shabaturov, Leonid Jiang, Gening Fan, Jiang Ann Transl Med Original Article BACKGROUND: Mediastinal cysts (MCs) can be misdiagnosed as mediastinal tumors (MTs) such as thymomas on the basis of radiological examinations, including computerized tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Our study aimed to determine the utility of a radiomics model combined with eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) for diagnosing anterior mediastinal masses. METHODS: Patients with anterior mediastinal lesions admitted to Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital between October 2014 and January 2018 were enrolled in the study. Mediastinal lesions were sketched on each CT image frame using OsiriX workstation. The study involved a total of 592 patients (289 male/303 female; age range, 18–83 years) with anterior mediastinal lesions (322 MCs and 270 MTs). Previously collected training data was used to build an XGBoost model to classify MCs and MTs, and a prospectively collected training dataset and external data from Huashan Hospital were used for validation. The SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) method was used to help understand the complex model. RESULTS: The XGBoost model was established using 107 selected radiomic features, and an accuracy of 0.972 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.948–0.995] was achieved compared to 0.820 for radiologists. For lesions smaller than 2 cm, XGBoost model accuracy reduced slightly to 0.835, while the accuracy of radiologists was only 0.667. The model accuracy also achieved 0.910 when validated using an independent external dataset containing 87 cases. SHAP analysis suggested the 90% percentile Hounsfield unit value as a promising diagnostic parameter. CONCLUSIONS: Our combined radiomics and XGBoost model significantly increased the accuracy of distinguishing between MCs and MTs compared to the level of accuracy obtained by radiologists. AME Publishing Company 2021-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8743732/ /pubmed/35071431 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-21-5999 Text en 2021 Annals of Translational Medicine. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Wang, Xing
You, Xiaofang
Zhang, Li
Huang, Dayu
Aramini, Beatrice
Shabaturov, Leonid
Jiang, Gening
Fan, Jiang
A radiomics model combined with XGBoost may improve the accuracy of distinguishing between mediastinal cysts and tumors: a multicenter validation analysis
title A radiomics model combined with XGBoost may improve the accuracy of distinguishing between mediastinal cysts and tumors: a multicenter validation analysis
title_full A radiomics model combined with XGBoost may improve the accuracy of distinguishing between mediastinal cysts and tumors: a multicenter validation analysis
title_fullStr A radiomics model combined with XGBoost may improve the accuracy of distinguishing between mediastinal cysts and tumors: a multicenter validation analysis
title_full_unstemmed A radiomics model combined with XGBoost may improve the accuracy of distinguishing between mediastinal cysts and tumors: a multicenter validation analysis
title_short A radiomics model combined with XGBoost may improve the accuracy of distinguishing between mediastinal cysts and tumors: a multicenter validation analysis
title_sort radiomics model combined with xgboost may improve the accuracy of distinguishing between mediastinal cysts and tumors: a multicenter validation analysis
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8743732/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35071431
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-21-5999
work_keys_str_mv AT wangxing aradiomicsmodelcombinedwithxgboostmayimprovetheaccuracyofdistinguishingbetweenmediastinalcystsandtumorsamulticentervalidationanalysis
AT youxiaofang aradiomicsmodelcombinedwithxgboostmayimprovetheaccuracyofdistinguishingbetweenmediastinalcystsandtumorsamulticentervalidationanalysis
AT zhangli aradiomicsmodelcombinedwithxgboostmayimprovetheaccuracyofdistinguishingbetweenmediastinalcystsandtumorsamulticentervalidationanalysis
AT huangdayu aradiomicsmodelcombinedwithxgboostmayimprovetheaccuracyofdistinguishingbetweenmediastinalcystsandtumorsamulticentervalidationanalysis
AT araminibeatrice aradiomicsmodelcombinedwithxgboostmayimprovetheaccuracyofdistinguishingbetweenmediastinalcystsandtumorsamulticentervalidationanalysis
AT shabaturovleonid aradiomicsmodelcombinedwithxgboostmayimprovetheaccuracyofdistinguishingbetweenmediastinalcystsandtumorsamulticentervalidationanalysis
AT jianggening aradiomicsmodelcombinedwithxgboostmayimprovetheaccuracyofdistinguishingbetweenmediastinalcystsandtumorsamulticentervalidationanalysis
AT fanjiang aradiomicsmodelcombinedwithxgboostmayimprovetheaccuracyofdistinguishingbetweenmediastinalcystsandtumorsamulticentervalidationanalysis
AT wangxing radiomicsmodelcombinedwithxgboostmayimprovetheaccuracyofdistinguishingbetweenmediastinalcystsandtumorsamulticentervalidationanalysis
AT youxiaofang radiomicsmodelcombinedwithxgboostmayimprovetheaccuracyofdistinguishingbetweenmediastinalcystsandtumorsamulticentervalidationanalysis
AT zhangli radiomicsmodelcombinedwithxgboostmayimprovetheaccuracyofdistinguishingbetweenmediastinalcystsandtumorsamulticentervalidationanalysis
AT huangdayu radiomicsmodelcombinedwithxgboostmayimprovetheaccuracyofdistinguishingbetweenmediastinalcystsandtumorsamulticentervalidationanalysis
AT araminibeatrice radiomicsmodelcombinedwithxgboostmayimprovetheaccuracyofdistinguishingbetweenmediastinalcystsandtumorsamulticentervalidationanalysis
AT shabaturovleonid radiomicsmodelcombinedwithxgboostmayimprovetheaccuracyofdistinguishingbetweenmediastinalcystsandtumorsamulticentervalidationanalysis
AT jianggening radiomicsmodelcombinedwithxgboostmayimprovetheaccuracyofdistinguishingbetweenmediastinalcystsandtumorsamulticentervalidationanalysis
AT fanjiang radiomicsmodelcombinedwithxgboostmayimprovetheaccuracyofdistinguishingbetweenmediastinalcystsandtumorsamulticentervalidationanalysis