Cargando…
A radiomics model combined with XGBoost may improve the accuracy of distinguishing between mediastinal cysts and tumors: a multicenter validation analysis
BACKGROUND: Mediastinal cysts (MCs) can be misdiagnosed as mediastinal tumors (MTs) such as thymomas on the basis of radiological examinations, including computerized tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Our study aimed to determine the utility of a radiomics model combined with eXt...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
AME Publishing Company
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8743732/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35071431 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-21-5999 |
_version_ | 1784629973685895168 |
---|---|
author | Wang, Xing You, Xiaofang Zhang, Li Huang, Dayu Aramini, Beatrice Shabaturov, Leonid Jiang, Gening Fan, Jiang |
author_facet | Wang, Xing You, Xiaofang Zhang, Li Huang, Dayu Aramini, Beatrice Shabaturov, Leonid Jiang, Gening Fan, Jiang |
author_sort | Wang, Xing |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Mediastinal cysts (MCs) can be misdiagnosed as mediastinal tumors (MTs) such as thymomas on the basis of radiological examinations, including computerized tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Our study aimed to determine the utility of a radiomics model combined with eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) for diagnosing anterior mediastinal masses. METHODS: Patients with anterior mediastinal lesions admitted to Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital between October 2014 and January 2018 were enrolled in the study. Mediastinal lesions were sketched on each CT image frame using OsiriX workstation. The study involved a total of 592 patients (289 male/303 female; age range, 18–83 years) with anterior mediastinal lesions (322 MCs and 270 MTs). Previously collected training data was used to build an XGBoost model to classify MCs and MTs, and a prospectively collected training dataset and external data from Huashan Hospital were used for validation. The SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) method was used to help understand the complex model. RESULTS: The XGBoost model was established using 107 selected radiomic features, and an accuracy of 0.972 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.948–0.995] was achieved compared to 0.820 for radiologists. For lesions smaller than 2 cm, XGBoost model accuracy reduced slightly to 0.835, while the accuracy of radiologists was only 0.667. The model accuracy also achieved 0.910 when validated using an independent external dataset containing 87 cases. SHAP analysis suggested the 90% percentile Hounsfield unit value as a promising diagnostic parameter. CONCLUSIONS: Our combined radiomics and XGBoost model significantly increased the accuracy of distinguishing between MCs and MTs compared to the level of accuracy obtained by radiologists. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8743732 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | AME Publishing Company |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87437322022-01-21 A radiomics model combined with XGBoost may improve the accuracy of distinguishing between mediastinal cysts and tumors: a multicenter validation analysis Wang, Xing You, Xiaofang Zhang, Li Huang, Dayu Aramini, Beatrice Shabaturov, Leonid Jiang, Gening Fan, Jiang Ann Transl Med Original Article BACKGROUND: Mediastinal cysts (MCs) can be misdiagnosed as mediastinal tumors (MTs) such as thymomas on the basis of radiological examinations, including computerized tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Our study aimed to determine the utility of a radiomics model combined with eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) for diagnosing anterior mediastinal masses. METHODS: Patients with anterior mediastinal lesions admitted to Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital between October 2014 and January 2018 were enrolled in the study. Mediastinal lesions were sketched on each CT image frame using OsiriX workstation. The study involved a total of 592 patients (289 male/303 female; age range, 18–83 years) with anterior mediastinal lesions (322 MCs and 270 MTs). Previously collected training data was used to build an XGBoost model to classify MCs and MTs, and a prospectively collected training dataset and external data from Huashan Hospital were used for validation. The SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) method was used to help understand the complex model. RESULTS: The XGBoost model was established using 107 selected radiomic features, and an accuracy of 0.972 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.948–0.995] was achieved compared to 0.820 for radiologists. For lesions smaller than 2 cm, XGBoost model accuracy reduced slightly to 0.835, while the accuracy of radiologists was only 0.667. The model accuracy also achieved 0.910 when validated using an independent external dataset containing 87 cases. SHAP analysis suggested the 90% percentile Hounsfield unit value as a promising diagnostic parameter. CONCLUSIONS: Our combined radiomics and XGBoost model significantly increased the accuracy of distinguishing between MCs and MTs compared to the level of accuracy obtained by radiologists. AME Publishing Company 2021-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8743732/ /pubmed/35071431 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-21-5999 Text en 2021 Annals of Translational Medicine. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Wang, Xing You, Xiaofang Zhang, Li Huang, Dayu Aramini, Beatrice Shabaturov, Leonid Jiang, Gening Fan, Jiang A radiomics model combined with XGBoost may improve the accuracy of distinguishing between mediastinal cysts and tumors: a multicenter validation analysis |
title | A radiomics model combined with XGBoost may improve the accuracy of distinguishing between mediastinal cysts and tumors: a multicenter validation analysis |
title_full | A radiomics model combined with XGBoost may improve the accuracy of distinguishing between mediastinal cysts and tumors: a multicenter validation analysis |
title_fullStr | A radiomics model combined with XGBoost may improve the accuracy of distinguishing between mediastinal cysts and tumors: a multicenter validation analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | A radiomics model combined with XGBoost may improve the accuracy of distinguishing between mediastinal cysts and tumors: a multicenter validation analysis |
title_short | A radiomics model combined with XGBoost may improve the accuracy of distinguishing between mediastinal cysts and tumors: a multicenter validation analysis |
title_sort | radiomics model combined with xgboost may improve the accuracy of distinguishing between mediastinal cysts and tumors: a multicenter validation analysis |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8743732/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35071431 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-21-5999 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wangxing aradiomicsmodelcombinedwithxgboostmayimprovetheaccuracyofdistinguishingbetweenmediastinalcystsandtumorsamulticentervalidationanalysis AT youxiaofang aradiomicsmodelcombinedwithxgboostmayimprovetheaccuracyofdistinguishingbetweenmediastinalcystsandtumorsamulticentervalidationanalysis AT zhangli aradiomicsmodelcombinedwithxgboostmayimprovetheaccuracyofdistinguishingbetweenmediastinalcystsandtumorsamulticentervalidationanalysis AT huangdayu aradiomicsmodelcombinedwithxgboostmayimprovetheaccuracyofdistinguishingbetweenmediastinalcystsandtumorsamulticentervalidationanalysis AT araminibeatrice aradiomicsmodelcombinedwithxgboostmayimprovetheaccuracyofdistinguishingbetweenmediastinalcystsandtumorsamulticentervalidationanalysis AT shabaturovleonid aradiomicsmodelcombinedwithxgboostmayimprovetheaccuracyofdistinguishingbetweenmediastinalcystsandtumorsamulticentervalidationanalysis AT jianggening aradiomicsmodelcombinedwithxgboostmayimprovetheaccuracyofdistinguishingbetweenmediastinalcystsandtumorsamulticentervalidationanalysis AT fanjiang aradiomicsmodelcombinedwithxgboostmayimprovetheaccuracyofdistinguishingbetweenmediastinalcystsandtumorsamulticentervalidationanalysis AT wangxing radiomicsmodelcombinedwithxgboostmayimprovetheaccuracyofdistinguishingbetweenmediastinalcystsandtumorsamulticentervalidationanalysis AT youxiaofang radiomicsmodelcombinedwithxgboostmayimprovetheaccuracyofdistinguishingbetweenmediastinalcystsandtumorsamulticentervalidationanalysis AT zhangli radiomicsmodelcombinedwithxgboostmayimprovetheaccuracyofdistinguishingbetweenmediastinalcystsandtumorsamulticentervalidationanalysis AT huangdayu radiomicsmodelcombinedwithxgboostmayimprovetheaccuracyofdistinguishingbetweenmediastinalcystsandtumorsamulticentervalidationanalysis AT araminibeatrice radiomicsmodelcombinedwithxgboostmayimprovetheaccuracyofdistinguishingbetweenmediastinalcystsandtumorsamulticentervalidationanalysis AT shabaturovleonid radiomicsmodelcombinedwithxgboostmayimprovetheaccuracyofdistinguishingbetweenmediastinalcystsandtumorsamulticentervalidationanalysis AT jianggening radiomicsmodelcombinedwithxgboostmayimprovetheaccuracyofdistinguishingbetweenmediastinalcystsandtumorsamulticentervalidationanalysis AT fanjiang radiomicsmodelcombinedwithxgboostmayimprovetheaccuracyofdistinguishingbetweenmediastinalcystsandtumorsamulticentervalidationanalysis |