Cargando…
Seroprevalence and risk factors for brucellosis in small ruminant flocks in Karnataka in the Southern Province of India
BACKGROUND AND AIM: Brucellosis is a zoonotic disease of high economic and public health importance in large and small ruminant populations worldwide. A cross-sectional study was conducted to determine the seroprevalence and risk factors of brucellosis in small ruminants in organized farms in the so...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Veterinary World
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8743770/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35017831 http://dx.doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2021.2855-2862 |
_version_ | 1784629983397806080 |
---|---|
author | Natesan, Krithiga Kalleshamurthy, Triveni Nookala, Mangadevi Yadav, Chaitra Mohandoss, Nagalingam Skariah, Somy Sahay, Swati Shome, Bibek Ranjan Kumar, Obli Rajendran Vinodh Rahman, Habibur Shome, Rajeswari |
author_facet | Natesan, Krithiga Kalleshamurthy, Triveni Nookala, Mangadevi Yadav, Chaitra Mohandoss, Nagalingam Skariah, Somy Sahay, Swati Shome, Bibek Ranjan Kumar, Obli Rajendran Vinodh Rahman, Habibur Shome, Rajeswari |
author_sort | Natesan, Krithiga |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND AIM: Brucellosis is a zoonotic disease of high economic and public health importance in large and small ruminant populations worldwide. A cross-sectional study was conducted to determine the seroprevalence and risk factors of brucellosis in small ruminants in organized farms in the southern region of India. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Farms exclusively rearing sheep and goats were selected based on the number of animals (small, medium, or large) and the location of the farm (urban, periurban, or rural). A total of 1499 serum samples; 1001 from sheeps and 498 from goats were sourced from six sheep and four goat farms and tested using Rose Bengal Plate and indirect Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay tests. RESULTS: The apparent prevalence of brucellosis was higher in sheep (8.29%, 95% CI 6.7-10.1) than goats (5.82%, 95% CI 4.0-8.2). The true adjusted population level seroprevalence was also higher in sheep, at 7.7% (95% CI 6.0-9.6) than in goats, at 5.1% (95% CI 3.2-7.6). According to bivariate categorical analysis, six highly significant (p<0.001) animal- and farm-level risk factors for sheep were age, breed, number of lambings, history of abortion, rural farms, and presence of dogs on the farm. In goats, five significant risk factors were found: History of abortion, separate sheds, dogs on the farm, weekly veterinary consultation, and lack of brucellosis awareness. In a logistic regression model, abortion (OR (adjusted) 10.8, 95% CI 1.2-96.12), rural farms (OR (adjusted) 8.5, 95% CI 3.6-20.0), and absence of separate sheds on the farms (OR 1.9, 95% CI 1.1-3.5) were found to be significant risk factors for ovine brucellosis. CONCLUSION: The use of complementary measures to tackle the multiple animal- and farm-level risk factors may help to reduce the disease burden in the absence of a vaccination policy for small ruminants in India. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8743770 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Veterinary World |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87437702022-01-10 Seroprevalence and risk factors for brucellosis in small ruminant flocks in Karnataka in the Southern Province of India Natesan, Krithiga Kalleshamurthy, Triveni Nookala, Mangadevi Yadav, Chaitra Mohandoss, Nagalingam Skariah, Somy Sahay, Swati Shome, Bibek Ranjan Kumar, Obli Rajendran Vinodh Rahman, Habibur Shome, Rajeswari Vet World Research Article BACKGROUND AND AIM: Brucellosis is a zoonotic disease of high economic and public health importance in large and small ruminant populations worldwide. A cross-sectional study was conducted to determine the seroprevalence and risk factors of brucellosis in small ruminants in organized farms in the southern region of India. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Farms exclusively rearing sheep and goats were selected based on the number of animals (small, medium, or large) and the location of the farm (urban, periurban, or rural). A total of 1499 serum samples; 1001 from sheeps and 498 from goats were sourced from six sheep and four goat farms and tested using Rose Bengal Plate and indirect Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay tests. RESULTS: The apparent prevalence of brucellosis was higher in sheep (8.29%, 95% CI 6.7-10.1) than goats (5.82%, 95% CI 4.0-8.2). The true adjusted population level seroprevalence was also higher in sheep, at 7.7% (95% CI 6.0-9.6) than in goats, at 5.1% (95% CI 3.2-7.6). According to bivariate categorical analysis, six highly significant (p<0.001) animal- and farm-level risk factors for sheep were age, breed, number of lambings, history of abortion, rural farms, and presence of dogs on the farm. In goats, five significant risk factors were found: History of abortion, separate sheds, dogs on the farm, weekly veterinary consultation, and lack of brucellosis awareness. In a logistic regression model, abortion (OR (adjusted) 10.8, 95% CI 1.2-96.12), rural farms (OR (adjusted) 8.5, 95% CI 3.6-20.0), and absence of separate sheds on the farms (OR 1.9, 95% CI 1.1-3.5) were found to be significant risk factors for ovine brucellosis. CONCLUSION: The use of complementary measures to tackle the multiple animal- and farm-level risk factors may help to reduce the disease burden in the absence of a vaccination policy for small ruminants in India. Veterinary World 2021-11 2021-11-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8743770/ /pubmed/35017831 http://dx.doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2021.2855-2862 Text en Copyright: © Natesan, et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Natesan, Krithiga Kalleshamurthy, Triveni Nookala, Mangadevi Yadav, Chaitra Mohandoss, Nagalingam Skariah, Somy Sahay, Swati Shome, Bibek Ranjan Kumar, Obli Rajendran Vinodh Rahman, Habibur Shome, Rajeswari Seroprevalence and risk factors for brucellosis in small ruminant flocks in Karnataka in the Southern Province of India |
title | Seroprevalence and risk factors for brucellosis in small ruminant flocks in Karnataka in the Southern Province of India |
title_full | Seroprevalence and risk factors for brucellosis in small ruminant flocks in Karnataka in the Southern Province of India |
title_fullStr | Seroprevalence and risk factors for brucellosis in small ruminant flocks in Karnataka in the Southern Province of India |
title_full_unstemmed | Seroprevalence and risk factors for brucellosis in small ruminant flocks in Karnataka in the Southern Province of India |
title_short | Seroprevalence and risk factors for brucellosis in small ruminant flocks in Karnataka in the Southern Province of India |
title_sort | seroprevalence and risk factors for brucellosis in small ruminant flocks in karnataka in the southern province of india |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8743770/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35017831 http://dx.doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2021.2855-2862 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT natesankrithiga seroprevalenceandriskfactorsforbrucellosisinsmallruminantflocksinkarnatakainthesouthernprovinceofindia AT kalleshamurthytriveni seroprevalenceandriskfactorsforbrucellosisinsmallruminantflocksinkarnatakainthesouthernprovinceofindia AT nookalamangadevi seroprevalenceandriskfactorsforbrucellosisinsmallruminantflocksinkarnatakainthesouthernprovinceofindia AT yadavchaitra seroprevalenceandriskfactorsforbrucellosisinsmallruminantflocksinkarnatakainthesouthernprovinceofindia AT mohandossnagalingam seroprevalenceandriskfactorsforbrucellosisinsmallruminantflocksinkarnatakainthesouthernprovinceofindia AT skariahsomy seroprevalenceandriskfactorsforbrucellosisinsmallruminantflocksinkarnatakainthesouthernprovinceofindia AT sahayswati seroprevalenceandriskfactorsforbrucellosisinsmallruminantflocksinkarnatakainthesouthernprovinceofindia AT shomebibekranjan seroprevalenceandriskfactorsforbrucellosisinsmallruminantflocksinkarnatakainthesouthernprovinceofindia AT kumaroblirajendranvinodh seroprevalenceandriskfactorsforbrucellosisinsmallruminantflocksinkarnatakainthesouthernprovinceofindia AT rahmanhabibur seroprevalenceandriskfactorsforbrucellosisinsmallruminantflocksinkarnatakainthesouthernprovinceofindia AT shomerajeswari seroprevalenceandriskfactorsforbrucellosisinsmallruminantflocksinkarnatakainthesouthernprovinceofindia |