Cargando…

Ethical health security in the age of antimicrobial resistance

OBJECTIVE: Owing to its potential human, social and economic costs, antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is frequently referred to as a threat to health security. Simultaneously, health security and the preservation of antimicrobials are often described as a global public good. However, how the term ‘publ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pahlman, Kari, Fehross, Anson, Fox, Greg J, Silva, Diego S
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8743836/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34996766
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2021-007407
_version_ 1784629999745105920
author Pahlman, Kari
Fehross, Anson
Fox, Greg J
Silva, Diego S
author_facet Pahlman, Kari
Fehross, Anson
Fox, Greg J
Silva, Diego S
author_sort Pahlman, Kari
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Owing to its potential human, social and economic costs, antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is frequently referred to as a threat to health security. Simultaneously, health security and the preservation of antimicrobials are often described as a global public good. However, how the term ‘public good’ is used in the context of health security, and the values that underpin it, remains ambiguous. Policymaking is never value-free, and a better examination of such values is critical to understanding how issues such as AMR are problematised and how policy decisions are informed. DESIGN: We used McDougall’s version of critical interpretive synthesis to capture the recurring concepts and arguments within public policy, political science and applied ethics literature on AMR. Articles were analysed by identifying recurring ideas and developing themes across the literature. RESULTS: A total of 77 papers were included in our review. In the context of health security and AMR, the concept of ‘public good’ appears to be used interchangeably with ‘common good’, reflecting confusion, but sometimes meaningful differences, regarding how antimicrobials, as a good, are conceived. Main approaches to addressing AMR are statism, globalism and regionalism, which appeal to different values in guiding policymakers. Common justificatory values underpinning preservation of antimicrobials as a public good were prevention of harm, solidarity, justice and rights. CONCLUSION: The findings suggest that within the literature there is a lack of conceptual clarity as to whether antimicrobials constitute a public good or a common good. Moreover, the way in which antimicrobials are conceived and the approaches through which AMR as a threat to health security is addressed appear to be grounded in values that are often implicit. Being explicit about the values that underpin AMR and health security is not simply an intellectual exercise but has very real policy and programmatic implications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8743836
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87438362022-01-10 Ethical health security in the age of antimicrobial resistance Pahlman, Kari Fehross, Anson Fox, Greg J Silva, Diego S BMJ Glob Health Original Research OBJECTIVE: Owing to its potential human, social and economic costs, antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is frequently referred to as a threat to health security. Simultaneously, health security and the preservation of antimicrobials are often described as a global public good. However, how the term ‘public good’ is used in the context of health security, and the values that underpin it, remains ambiguous. Policymaking is never value-free, and a better examination of such values is critical to understanding how issues such as AMR are problematised and how policy decisions are informed. DESIGN: We used McDougall’s version of critical interpretive synthesis to capture the recurring concepts and arguments within public policy, political science and applied ethics literature on AMR. Articles were analysed by identifying recurring ideas and developing themes across the literature. RESULTS: A total of 77 papers were included in our review. In the context of health security and AMR, the concept of ‘public good’ appears to be used interchangeably with ‘common good’, reflecting confusion, but sometimes meaningful differences, regarding how antimicrobials, as a good, are conceived. Main approaches to addressing AMR are statism, globalism and regionalism, which appeal to different values in guiding policymakers. Common justificatory values underpinning preservation of antimicrobials as a public good were prevention of harm, solidarity, justice and rights. CONCLUSION: The findings suggest that within the literature there is a lack of conceptual clarity as to whether antimicrobials constitute a public good or a common good. Moreover, the way in which antimicrobials are conceived and the approaches through which AMR as a threat to health security is addressed appear to be grounded in values that are often implicit. Being explicit about the values that underpin AMR and health security is not simply an intellectual exercise but has very real policy and programmatic implications. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-01-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8743836/ /pubmed/34996766 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2021-007407 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Research
Pahlman, Kari
Fehross, Anson
Fox, Greg J
Silva, Diego S
Ethical health security in the age of antimicrobial resistance
title Ethical health security in the age of antimicrobial resistance
title_full Ethical health security in the age of antimicrobial resistance
title_fullStr Ethical health security in the age of antimicrobial resistance
title_full_unstemmed Ethical health security in the age of antimicrobial resistance
title_short Ethical health security in the age of antimicrobial resistance
title_sort ethical health security in the age of antimicrobial resistance
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8743836/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34996766
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2021-007407
work_keys_str_mv AT pahlmankari ethicalhealthsecurityintheageofantimicrobialresistance
AT fehrossanson ethicalhealthsecurityintheageofantimicrobialresistance
AT foxgregj ethicalhealthsecurityintheageofantimicrobialresistance
AT silvadiegos ethicalhealthsecurityintheageofantimicrobialresistance