Cargando…
Determining Persistence with an Inhaled Corticosteroid in Asthma: Assessment Using an Objective Measurement vs the Self-Reported Foster Score
INTRODUCTION: Adherence with controller medication is a major challenge in asthma management. Thus, a reliable method of measurement is mandatory to assess adherence. AIM: To examine the test-retest reliability on adherence with inhaled corticosteroids in adults with asthma using, a self-reported ad...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8743862/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35023932 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JAA.S332756 |
_version_ | 1784630005890809856 |
---|---|
author | Hedegaard, Britt Overgaard Håkansson, Kjell Erik Julius Jensen, Frodi Fridason Ulrik, Charlotte Suppli Weinreich, Ulla Møller |
author_facet | Hedegaard, Britt Overgaard Håkansson, Kjell Erik Julius Jensen, Frodi Fridason Ulrik, Charlotte Suppli Weinreich, Ulla Møller |
author_sort | Hedegaard, Britt Overgaard |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Adherence with controller medication is a major challenge in asthma management. Thus, a reliable method of measurement is mandatory to assess adherence. AIM: To examine the test-retest reliability on adherence with inhaled corticosteroids in adults with asthma using, a self-reported adherence score (Foster score). METHODS: Patients with asthma and >1 routine follow-up appointment at a university hospital outpatient clinic reported Foster scores. The objective Medication Possession Ratio (MPR) was calculated based on pharmacy redemption data and physician-prescribed doses of inhaled corticosteroids. The difference between Foster score and MPR at the first and second visit was assessed using a Bland–Altman plot, outcomes reported as limits of agreements and bias. Foster scores from both visits were used to calculate an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). RESULTS: Self-reported adherence with asthma controller medication measured by Foster score was significantly higher than the objective MPR (p < 0.0001). The Bland–Altman plot for MPR and Foster score at the first and second visit showed upper and lower limits of agreement of 83.5 – (−1.6) and 80.9 – (−6.9) and bias was 41.0 and 37.0, respectively. Of the included patients, 93.1% reported identical Foster scores between visits, resulting in an excellent ICC of 0.92. Absolute median difference between Foster scores and MPR at first and second visit was 8.7 percentage points (p = 0.049). CONCLUSION: Foster score shows an excellent ICC; however, its poor agreement with objective measures of adherence suggests that clinicians should not rely on Foster scores alone to assess adherence with inhaled corticosteroids in patients with asthma. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8743862 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Dove |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87438622022-01-11 Determining Persistence with an Inhaled Corticosteroid in Asthma: Assessment Using an Objective Measurement vs the Self-Reported Foster Score Hedegaard, Britt Overgaard Håkansson, Kjell Erik Julius Jensen, Frodi Fridason Ulrik, Charlotte Suppli Weinreich, Ulla Møller J Asthma Allergy Short Report INTRODUCTION: Adherence with controller medication is a major challenge in asthma management. Thus, a reliable method of measurement is mandatory to assess adherence. AIM: To examine the test-retest reliability on adherence with inhaled corticosteroids in adults with asthma using, a self-reported adherence score (Foster score). METHODS: Patients with asthma and >1 routine follow-up appointment at a university hospital outpatient clinic reported Foster scores. The objective Medication Possession Ratio (MPR) was calculated based on pharmacy redemption data and physician-prescribed doses of inhaled corticosteroids. The difference between Foster score and MPR at the first and second visit was assessed using a Bland–Altman plot, outcomes reported as limits of agreements and bias. Foster scores from both visits were used to calculate an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). RESULTS: Self-reported adherence with asthma controller medication measured by Foster score was significantly higher than the objective MPR (p < 0.0001). The Bland–Altman plot for MPR and Foster score at the first and second visit showed upper and lower limits of agreement of 83.5 – (−1.6) and 80.9 – (−6.9) and bias was 41.0 and 37.0, respectively. Of the included patients, 93.1% reported identical Foster scores between visits, resulting in an excellent ICC of 0.92. Absolute median difference between Foster scores and MPR at first and second visit was 8.7 percentage points (p = 0.049). CONCLUSION: Foster score shows an excellent ICC; however, its poor agreement with objective measures of adherence suggests that clinicians should not rely on Foster scores alone to assess adherence with inhaled corticosteroids in patients with asthma. Dove 2022-01-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8743862/ /pubmed/35023932 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JAA.S332756 Text en © 2022 Hedegaard et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php). |
spellingShingle | Short Report Hedegaard, Britt Overgaard Håkansson, Kjell Erik Julius Jensen, Frodi Fridason Ulrik, Charlotte Suppli Weinreich, Ulla Møller Determining Persistence with an Inhaled Corticosteroid in Asthma: Assessment Using an Objective Measurement vs the Self-Reported Foster Score |
title | Determining Persistence with an Inhaled Corticosteroid in Asthma: Assessment Using an Objective Measurement vs the Self-Reported Foster Score |
title_full | Determining Persistence with an Inhaled Corticosteroid in Asthma: Assessment Using an Objective Measurement vs the Self-Reported Foster Score |
title_fullStr | Determining Persistence with an Inhaled Corticosteroid in Asthma: Assessment Using an Objective Measurement vs the Self-Reported Foster Score |
title_full_unstemmed | Determining Persistence with an Inhaled Corticosteroid in Asthma: Assessment Using an Objective Measurement vs the Self-Reported Foster Score |
title_short | Determining Persistence with an Inhaled Corticosteroid in Asthma: Assessment Using an Objective Measurement vs the Self-Reported Foster Score |
title_sort | determining persistence with an inhaled corticosteroid in asthma: assessment using an objective measurement vs the self-reported foster score |
topic | Short Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8743862/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35023932 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JAA.S332756 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hedegaardbrittovergaard determiningpersistencewithaninhaledcorticosteroidinasthmaassessmentusinganobjectivemeasurementvstheselfreportedfosterscore AT hakanssonkjellerikjulius determiningpersistencewithaninhaledcorticosteroidinasthmaassessmentusinganobjectivemeasurementvstheselfreportedfosterscore AT jensenfrodifridason determiningpersistencewithaninhaledcorticosteroidinasthmaassessmentusinganobjectivemeasurementvstheselfreportedfosterscore AT ulrikcharlottesuppli determiningpersistencewithaninhaledcorticosteroidinasthmaassessmentusinganobjectivemeasurementvstheselfreportedfosterscore AT weinreichullamøller determiningpersistencewithaninhaledcorticosteroidinasthmaassessmentusinganobjectivemeasurementvstheselfreportedfosterscore |