Cargando…
Social hierarchies and social networks in humans
Across species, social hierarchies are often governed by dominance relations. In humans, where there are multiple culturally valued axes of distinction, social hierarchies can take a variety of forms and need not rest on dominance relations. Consequently, humans navigate multiple domains of status,...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Royal Society
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8743884/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35000451 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2020.0440 |
_version_ | 1784630009686654976 |
---|---|
author | Redhead, Daniel Power, Eleanor A. |
author_facet | Redhead, Daniel Power, Eleanor A. |
author_sort | Redhead, Daniel |
collection | PubMed |
description | Across species, social hierarchies are often governed by dominance relations. In humans, where there are multiple culturally valued axes of distinction, social hierarchies can take a variety of forms and need not rest on dominance relations. Consequently, humans navigate multiple domains of status, i.e. relative standing. Importantly, while these hierarchies may be constructed from dyadic interactions, they are often more fundamentally guided by subjective peer evaluations and group perceptions. Researchers have typically focused on the distinct elements that shape individuals’ relative standing, with some emphasizing individual-level attributes and others outlining emergent macro-level structural outcomes. Here, we synthesize work across the social sciences to suggest that the dynamic interplay between individual-level and meso-level properties of the social networks in which individuals are embedded are crucial for understanding the diverse processes of status differentiation across groups. More specifically, we observe that humans not only navigate multiple social hierarchies at any given time but also simultaneously operate within multiple, overlapping social networks. There are important dynamic feedbacks between social hierarchies and the characteristics of social networks, as the types of social relationships, their structural properties, and the relative position of individuals within them both influence and are influenced by status differentiation. This article is part of the theme issue ‘The centennial of the pecking order: current state and future prospects for the study of dominance hierarchies’. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8743884 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | The Royal Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87438842022-02-15 Social hierarchies and social networks in humans Redhead, Daniel Power, Eleanor A. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci Part III: Hierarchical Structure of Dominance Across species, social hierarchies are often governed by dominance relations. In humans, where there are multiple culturally valued axes of distinction, social hierarchies can take a variety of forms and need not rest on dominance relations. Consequently, humans navigate multiple domains of status, i.e. relative standing. Importantly, while these hierarchies may be constructed from dyadic interactions, they are often more fundamentally guided by subjective peer evaluations and group perceptions. Researchers have typically focused on the distinct elements that shape individuals’ relative standing, with some emphasizing individual-level attributes and others outlining emergent macro-level structural outcomes. Here, we synthesize work across the social sciences to suggest that the dynamic interplay between individual-level and meso-level properties of the social networks in which individuals are embedded are crucial for understanding the diverse processes of status differentiation across groups. More specifically, we observe that humans not only navigate multiple social hierarchies at any given time but also simultaneously operate within multiple, overlapping social networks. There are important dynamic feedbacks between social hierarchies and the characteristics of social networks, as the types of social relationships, their structural properties, and the relative position of individuals within them both influence and are influenced by status differentiation. This article is part of the theme issue ‘The centennial of the pecking order: current state and future prospects for the study of dominance hierarchies’. The Royal Society 2022-02-28 2022-01-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8743884/ /pubmed/35000451 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2020.0440 Text en © 2022 The Authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Part III: Hierarchical Structure of Dominance Redhead, Daniel Power, Eleanor A. Social hierarchies and social networks in humans |
title | Social hierarchies and social networks in humans |
title_full | Social hierarchies and social networks in humans |
title_fullStr | Social hierarchies and social networks in humans |
title_full_unstemmed | Social hierarchies and social networks in humans |
title_short | Social hierarchies and social networks in humans |
title_sort | social hierarchies and social networks in humans |
topic | Part III: Hierarchical Structure of Dominance |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8743884/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35000451 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2020.0440 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT redheaddaniel socialhierarchiesandsocialnetworksinhumans AT powereleanora socialhierarchiesandsocialnetworksinhumans |