Cargando…

The centennial of the pecking order: current state and future prospects for the study of dominance hierarchies

A century ago, foundational work by Thorleif Schjelderup-Ebbe described a ‘pecking order’ in chicken societies, where individuals could be ordered according to their ability to exert their influence over their group-mates. Now known as dominance hierarchies, these structures have been shown to influ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Strauss, Eli D., Curley, James P., Shizuka, Daizaburo, Hobson, Elizabeth A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Royal Society 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8743894/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35000437
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2020.0432
_version_ 1784630010949140480
author Strauss, Eli D.
Curley, James P.
Shizuka, Daizaburo
Hobson, Elizabeth A.
author_facet Strauss, Eli D.
Curley, James P.
Shizuka, Daizaburo
Hobson, Elizabeth A.
author_sort Strauss, Eli D.
collection PubMed
description A century ago, foundational work by Thorleif Schjelderup-Ebbe described a ‘pecking order’ in chicken societies, where individuals could be ordered according to their ability to exert their influence over their group-mates. Now known as dominance hierarchies, these structures have been shown to influence a plethora of individual characteristics and outcomes, situating dominance research as a pillar of the study of modern social ecology and evolution. Here, we first review some of the major questions that have been answered about dominance hierarchies in the last 100 years. Next, we introduce the contributions to this theme issue and summarize how they provide ongoing insight in the epistemology, physiology and neurobiology, hierarchical structure, and dynamics of dominance. These contributions employ the full range of research approaches available to modern biologists. Cross-cutting themes emerging from these contributions include a focus on cognitive underpinnings of dominance, the application of network-analytical approaches, and the utility of experimental rank manipulations for revealing causal relationships. Reflection on the last 100 years of dominance research reveals how Schjelderup-Ebbe's early ideas and the subsequent research helped drive a shift from an essentialist view of species characteristics to the modern recognition of rich inter-individual variation in social, behavioural and physiological phenotypes. This article is part of the theme issue ‘The centennial of the pecking order: current state and future prospects for the study of dominance hierarchies’.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8743894
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher The Royal Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87438942022-02-15 The centennial of the pecking order: current state and future prospects for the study of dominance hierarchies Strauss, Eli D. Curley, James P. Shizuka, Daizaburo Hobson, Elizabeth A. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci Introduction A century ago, foundational work by Thorleif Schjelderup-Ebbe described a ‘pecking order’ in chicken societies, where individuals could be ordered according to their ability to exert their influence over their group-mates. Now known as dominance hierarchies, these structures have been shown to influence a plethora of individual characteristics and outcomes, situating dominance research as a pillar of the study of modern social ecology and evolution. Here, we first review some of the major questions that have been answered about dominance hierarchies in the last 100 years. Next, we introduce the contributions to this theme issue and summarize how they provide ongoing insight in the epistemology, physiology and neurobiology, hierarchical structure, and dynamics of dominance. These contributions employ the full range of research approaches available to modern biologists. Cross-cutting themes emerging from these contributions include a focus on cognitive underpinnings of dominance, the application of network-analytical approaches, and the utility of experimental rank manipulations for revealing causal relationships. Reflection on the last 100 years of dominance research reveals how Schjelderup-Ebbe's early ideas and the subsequent research helped drive a shift from an essentialist view of species characteristics to the modern recognition of rich inter-individual variation in social, behavioural and physiological phenotypes. This article is part of the theme issue ‘The centennial of the pecking order: current state and future prospects for the study of dominance hierarchies’. The Royal Society 2022-02-28 2022-01-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8743894/ /pubmed/35000437 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2020.0432 Text en © 2022 The Authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Introduction
Strauss, Eli D.
Curley, James P.
Shizuka, Daizaburo
Hobson, Elizabeth A.
The centennial of the pecking order: current state and future prospects for the study of dominance hierarchies
title The centennial of the pecking order: current state and future prospects for the study of dominance hierarchies
title_full The centennial of the pecking order: current state and future prospects for the study of dominance hierarchies
title_fullStr The centennial of the pecking order: current state and future prospects for the study of dominance hierarchies
title_full_unstemmed The centennial of the pecking order: current state and future prospects for the study of dominance hierarchies
title_short The centennial of the pecking order: current state and future prospects for the study of dominance hierarchies
title_sort centennial of the pecking order: current state and future prospects for the study of dominance hierarchies
topic Introduction
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8743894/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35000437
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2020.0432
work_keys_str_mv AT strausselid thecentennialofthepeckingordercurrentstateandfutureprospectsforthestudyofdominancehierarchies
AT curleyjamesp thecentennialofthepeckingordercurrentstateandfutureprospectsforthestudyofdominancehierarchies
AT shizukadaizaburo thecentennialofthepeckingordercurrentstateandfutureprospectsforthestudyofdominancehierarchies
AT hobsonelizabetha thecentennialofthepeckingordercurrentstateandfutureprospectsforthestudyofdominancehierarchies
AT strausselid centennialofthepeckingordercurrentstateandfutureprospectsforthestudyofdominancehierarchies
AT curleyjamesp centennialofthepeckingordercurrentstateandfutureprospectsforthestudyofdominancehierarchies
AT shizukadaizaburo centennialofthepeckingordercurrentstateandfutureprospectsforthestudyofdominancehierarchies
AT hobsonelizabetha centennialofthepeckingordercurrentstateandfutureprospectsforthestudyofdominancehierarchies