Cargando…

Instruments for Detecting Moral Distress in Clinical Nurses: A Systematic Review

Moral distress (MD) has become a seriously negative problem experienced by healthcare professionals, especially clinical nurses. Early and accurate detection of MD by the validated and reliable instrument is critically important to further develop an effective intervention strategy. We performed the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tian, Xu, Jin, Yanfei, Chen, Hui, Jiménez-Herrera, María F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8743918/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33771048
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0046958021996499
_version_ 1784630012221063168
author Tian, Xu
Jin, Yanfei
Chen, Hui
Jiménez-Herrera, María F.
author_facet Tian, Xu
Jin, Yanfei
Chen, Hui
Jiménez-Herrera, María F.
author_sort Tian, Xu
collection PubMed
description Moral distress (MD) has become a seriously negative problem experienced by healthcare professionals, especially clinical nurses. Early and accurate detection of MD by the validated and reliable instrument is critically important to further develop an effective intervention strategy. We performed the current systematic review to comprehensively summarize the evidence of instruments for the detection of MD in clinical nurses. The research design was a systematic literature review. We assigned 2 investigators to independently search potential studies in PubMed, EMBASE, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) from their inception to June 2020. We used data extraction table extracting essential information, and the modified critical appraisal tool evaluating the reliability and validity of eligible instruments. Finally, we qualitatively summarized results of all included instruments. No ethical approval was required because this systematic review was performed based on published studies. We included 16 eligible studies covering 10 original and 6 revised or modified instruments for the final analysis. The overall quality of all instruments was moderate because test-retest reliability was inadequately examined in most instruments. Of 16 instruments, MDS-revised (MDS-R) was broadly validated and employed in different working or cultural settings. Meanwhile, it also extensively expands to specifically detect MD. Moreover, other instruments including moral distress risk scale (MDSR) and moral distress thermometer (MDT) should be further validated and utilized because it covered the gap missed by most instruments. Although several instruments have been made available for clinical nurses, some of them have inadequate psychometric properties test, especially test-retest reliability evaluation. Meanwhile, most of them have not be validated and employed in other working or cultural settings. We therefore suggested further studies to validate the psychometric properties of existing instruments and then employed instruments with high reliability and validity to detect MD in clinical nurses.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8743918
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87439182022-01-11 Instruments for Detecting Moral Distress in Clinical Nurses: A Systematic Review Tian, Xu Jin, Yanfei Chen, Hui Jiménez-Herrera, María F. Inquiry Systematic Review or Meta Moral distress (MD) has become a seriously negative problem experienced by healthcare professionals, especially clinical nurses. Early and accurate detection of MD by the validated and reliable instrument is critically important to further develop an effective intervention strategy. We performed the current systematic review to comprehensively summarize the evidence of instruments for the detection of MD in clinical nurses. The research design was a systematic literature review. We assigned 2 investigators to independently search potential studies in PubMed, EMBASE, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) from their inception to June 2020. We used data extraction table extracting essential information, and the modified critical appraisal tool evaluating the reliability and validity of eligible instruments. Finally, we qualitatively summarized results of all included instruments. No ethical approval was required because this systematic review was performed based on published studies. We included 16 eligible studies covering 10 original and 6 revised or modified instruments for the final analysis. The overall quality of all instruments was moderate because test-retest reliability was inadequately examined in most instruments. Of 16 instruments, MDS-revised (MDS-R) was broadly validated and employed in different working or cultural settings. Meanwhile, it also extensively expands to specifically detect MD. Moreover, other instruments including moral distress risk scale (MDSR) and moral distress thermometer (MDT) should be further validated and utilized because it covered the gap missed by most instruments. Although several instruments have been made available for clinical nurses, some of them have inadequate psychometric properties test, especially test-retest reliability evaluation. Meanwhile, most of them have not be validated and employed in other working or cultural settings. We therefore suggested further studies to validate the psychometric properties of existing instruments and then employed instruments with high reliability and validity to detect MD in clinical nurses. SAGE Publications 2021-03-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8743918/ /pubmed/33771048 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0046958021996499 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Systematic Review or Meta
Tian, Xu
Jin, Yanfei
Chen, Hui
Jiménez-Herrera, María F.
Instruments for Detecting Moral Distress in Clinical Nurses: A Systematic Review
title Instruments for Detecting Moral Distress in Clinical Nurses: A Systematic Review
title_full Instruments for Detecting Moral Distress in Clinical Nurses: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Instruments for Detecting Moral Distress in Clinical Nurses: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Instruments for Detecting Moral Distress in Clinical Nurses: A Systematic Review
title_short Instruments for Detecting Moral Distress in Clinical Nurses: A Systematic Review
title_sort instruments for detecting moral distress in clinical nurses: a systematic review
topic Systematic Review or Meta
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8743918/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33771048
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0046958021996499
work_keys_str_mv AT tianxu instrumentsfordetectingmoraldistressinclinicalnursesasystematicreview
AT jinyanfei instrumentsfordetectingmoraldistressinclinicalnursesasystematicreview
AT chenhui instrumentsfordetectingmoraldistressinclinicalnursesasystematicreview
AT jimenezherreramariaf instrumentsfordetectingmoraldistressinclinicalnursesasystematicreview