Cargando…

Improving Child Development Screening: Implications for Professional Practice and Patient Equity

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: A pediatric group with 25 clinics and 150 providers used multifaceted approaches to implement workflow processes and an electronic health record (EHR) flowsheet to improve child developmental screening. The key outcome was developmental screening done for every patient d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Meurer, John, Rohloff, Robert, Rein, Lisa, Kanter, Ilya, Kotagiri, Nayanika, Gundacker, Constance, Tarima, Sergey
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8743928/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34986680
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/21501319211062676
_version_ 1784630014210211840
author Meurer, John
Rohloff, Robert
Rein, Lisa
Kanter, Ilya
Kotagiri, Nayanika
Gundacker, Constance
Tarima, Sergey
author_facet Meurer, John
Rohloff, Robert
Rein, Lisa
Kanter, Ilya
Kotagiri, Nayanika
Gundacker, Constance
Tarima, Sergey
author_sort Meurer, John
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: A pediatric group with 25 clinics and 150 providers used multifaceted approaches to implement workflow processes and an electronic health record (EHR) flowsheet to improve child developmental screening. The key outcome was developmental screening done for every patient during 3 periods between ages 8 and 36 months. Identification of developmental concerns was the secondary study outcome. Screening rates and referrals were hypothesized to be optimized for children regardless of demographic backgrounds. METHODS: During preventive visits, developmental screens targeted patients in age groups 8 to 12, 13 to 24, and 25 to 36 months. EHRs were analyzed for screening documentation, results, and referrals by patient demographics. Fifteen pediatric professionals were interviewed about their qualitative experiences. Quality improvement interventions included appointing clinic champions, training staff about the screening process and responsibilities, using a standardized tool, employing plan-do-study-act cycles, posting EHR prompts, providing financial incentives, and monitoring screening rates using control charts. RESULTS: Within 25 months, screening rates improved from 60% to >95% within the 3 preventive visit age groups for a total of more than 30 000 children. Professionals valued the team process improvements. Children enrolled in Medicaid, black children, and those living in lower income zip codes had lower screening rates than privately insured, white children, and those living in higher income areas. Ages and Stages Questionnaire 3rd edition results were significantly different by gender, race/ethnicity, insurance, and income categories across all groups. Referral rates varied by race/ethnicity and zip code of residence. CONCLUSIONS: This project resulted in an effective and efficient process to improve child developmental screening that was valued by pediatric professionals. Analyses of patient demographics revealed disparities in services for the most vulnerable families. Ongoing quality improvement, health services research, and advocacy offer hope to improve health equity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8743928
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87439282022-01-11 Improving Child Development Screening: Implications for Professional Practice and Patient Equity Meurer, John Rohloff, Robert Rein, Lisa Kanter, Ilya Kotagiri, Nayanika Gundacker, Constance Tarima, Sergey J Prim Care Community Health Original Research INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: A pediatric group with 25 clinics and 150 providers used multifaceted approaches to implement workflow processes and an electronic health record (EHR) flowsheet to improve child developmental screening. The key outcome was developmental screening done for every patient during 3 periods between ages 8 and 36 months. Identification of developmental concerns was the secondary study outcome. Screening rates and referrals were hypothesized to be optimized for children regardless of demographic backgrounds. METHODS: During preventive visits, developmental screens targeted patients in age groups 8 to 12, 13 to 24, and 25 to 36 months. EHRs were analyzed for screening documentation, results, and referrals by patient demographics. Fifteen pediatric professionals were interviewed about their qualitative experiences. Quality improvement interventions included appointing clinic champions, training staff about the screening process and responsibilities, using a standardized tool, employing plan-do-study-act cycles, posting EHR prompts, providing financial incentives, and monitoring screening rates using control charts. RESULTS: Within 25 months, screening rates improved from 60% to >95% within the 3 preventive visit age groups for a total of more than 30 000 children. Professionals valued the team process improvements. Children enrolled in Medicaid, black children, and those living in lower income zip codes had lower screening rates than privately insured, white children, and those living in higher income areas. Ages and Stages Questionnaire 3rd edition results were significantly different by gender, race/ethnicity, insurance, and income categories across all groups. Referral rates varied by race/ethnicity and zip code of residence. CONCLUSIONS: This project resulted in an effective and efficient process to improve child developmental screening that was valued by pediatric professionals. Analyses of patient demographics revealed disparities in services for the most vulnerable families. Ongoing quality improvement, health services research, and advocacy offer hope to improve health equity. SAGE Publications 2022-01-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8743928/ /pubmed/34986680 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/21501319211062676 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Research
Meurer, John
Rohloff, Robert
Rein, Lisa
Kanter, Ilya
Kotagiri, Nayanika
Gundacker, Constance
Tarima, Sergey
Improving Child Development Screening: Implications for Professional Practice and Patient Equity
title Improving Child Development Screening: Implications for Professional Practice and Patient Equity
title_full Improving Child Development Screening: Implications for Professional Practice and Patient Equity
title_fullStr Improving Child Development Screening: Implications for Professional Practice and Patient Equity
title_full_unstemmed Improving Child Development Screening: Implications for Professional Practice and Patient Equity
title_short Improving Child Development Screening: Implications for Professional Practice and Patient Equity
title_sort improving child development screening: implications for professional practice and patient equity
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8743928/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34986680
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/21501319211062676
work_keys_str_mv AT meurerjohn improvingchilddevelopmentscreeningimplicationsforprofessionalpracticeandpatientequity
AT rohloffrobert improvingchilddevelopmentscreeningimplicationsforprofessionalpracticeandpatientequity
AT reinlisa improvingchilddevelopmentscreeningimplicationsforprofessionalpracticeandpatientequity
AT kanterilya improvingchilddevelopmentscreeningimplicationsforprofessionalpracticeandpatientequity
AT kotagirinayanika improvingchilddevelopmentscreeningimplicationsforprofessionalpracticeandpatientequity
AT gundackerconstance improvingchilddevelopmentscreeningimplicationsforprofessionalpracticeandpatientequity
AT tarimasergey improvingchilddevelopmentscreeningimplicationsforprofessionalpracticeandpatientequity