Cargando…
Improving Child Development Screening: Implications for Professional Practice and Patient Equity
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: A pediatric group with 25 clinics and 150 providers used multifaceted approaches to implement workflow processes and an electronic health record (EHR) flowsheet to improve child developmental screening. The key outcome was developmental screening done for every patient d...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8743928/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34986680 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/21501319211062676 |
_version_ | 1784630014210211840 |
---|---|
author | Meurer, John Rohloff, Robert Rein, Lisa Kanter, Ilya Kotagiri, Nayanika Gundacker, Constance Tarima, Sergey |
author_facet | Meurer, John Rohloff, Robert Rein, Lisa Kanter, Ilya Kotagiri, Nayanika Gundacker, Constance Tarima, Sergey |
author_sort | Meurer, John |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: A pediatric group with 25 clinics and 150 providers used multifaceted approaches to implement workflow processes and an electronic health record (EHR) flowsheet to improve child developmental screening. The key outcome was developmental screening done for every patient during 3 periods between ages 8 and 36 months. Identification of developmental concerns was the secondary study outcome. Screening rates and referrals were hypothesized to be optimized for children regardless of demographic backgrounds. METHODS: During preventive visits, developmental screens targeted patients in age groups 8 to 12, 13 to 24, and 25 to 36 months. EHRs were analyzed for screening documentation, results, and referrals by patient demographics. Fifteen pediatric professionals were interviewed about their qualitative experiences. Quality improvement interventions included appointing clinic champions, training staff about the screening process and responsibilities, using a standardized tool, employing plan-do-study-act cycles, posting EHR prompts, providing financial incentives, and monitoring screening rates using control charts. RESULTS: Within 25 months, screening rates improved from 60% to >95% within the 3 preventive visit age groups for a total of more than 30 000 children. Professionals valued the team process improvements. Children enrolled in Medicaid, black children, and those living in lower income zip codes had lower screening rates than privately insured, white children, and those living in higher income areas. Ages and Stages Questionnaire 3rd edition results were significantly different by gender, race/ethnicity, insurance, and income categories across all groups. Referral rates varied by race/ethnicity and zip code of residence. CONCLUSIONS: This project resulted in an effective and efficient process to improve child developmental screening that was valued by pediatric professionals. Analyses of patient demographics revealed disparities in services for the most vulnerable families. Ongoing quality improvement, health services research, and advocacy offer hope to improve health equity. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8743928 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87439282022-01-11 Improving Child Development Screening: Implications for Professional Practice and Patient Equity Meurer, John Rohloff, Robert Rein, Lisa Kanter, Ilya Kotagiri, Nayanika Gundacker, Constance Tarima, Sergey J Prim Care Community Health Original Research INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: A pediatric group with 25 clinics and 150 providers used multifaceted approaches to implement workflow processes and an electronic health record (EHR) flowsheet to improve child developmental screening. The key outcome was developmental screening done for every patient during 3 periods between ages 8 and 36 months. Identification of developmental concerns was the secondary study outcome. Screening rates and referrals were hypothesized to be optimized for children regardless of demographic backgrounds. METHODS: During preventive visits, developmental screens targeted patients in age groups 8 to 12, 13 to 24, and 25 to 36 months. EHRs were analyzed for screening documentation, results, and referrals by patient demographics. Fifteen pediatric professionals were interviewed about their qualitative experiences. Quality improvement interventions included appointing clinic champions, training staff about the screening process and responsibilities, using a standardized tool, employing plan-do-study-act cycles, posting EHR prompts, providing financial incentives, and monitoring screening rates using control charts. RESULTS: Within 25 months, screening rates improved from 60% to >95% within the 3 preventive visit age groups for a total of more than 30 000 children. Professionals valued the team process improvements. Children enrolled in Medicaid, black children, and those living in lower income zip codes had lower screening rates than privately insured, white children, and those living in higher income areas. Ages and Stages Questionnaire 3rd edition results were significantly different by gender, race/ethnicity, insurance, and income categories across all groups. Referral rates varied by race/ethnicity and zip code of residence. CONCLUSIONS: This project resulted in an effective and efficient process to improve child developmental screening that was valued by pediatric professionals. Analyses of patient demographics revealed disparities in services for the most vulnerable families. Ongoing quality improvement, health services research, and advocacy offer hope to improve health equity. SAGE Publications 2022-01-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8743928/ /pubmed/34986680 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/21501319211062676 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Meurer, John Rohloff, Robert Rein, Lisa Kanter, Ilya Kotagiri, Nayanika Gundacker, Constance Tarima, Sergey Improving Child Development Screening: Implications for Professional Practice and Patient Equity |
title | Improving Child Development Screening: Implications for Professional Practice and Patient Equity |
title_full | Improving Child Development Screening: Implications for Professional Practice and Patient Equity |
title_fullStr | Improving Child Development Screening: Implications for Professional Practice and Patient Equity |
title_full_unstemmed | Improving Child Development Screening: Implications for Professional Practice and Patient Equity |
title_short | Improving Child Development Screening: Implications for Professional Practice and Patient Equity |
title_sort | improving child development screening: implications for professional practice and patient equity |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8743928/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34986680 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/21501319211062676 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT meurerjohn improvingchilddevelopmentscreeningimplicationsforprofessionalpracticeandpatientequity AT rohloffrobert improvingchilddevelopmentscreeningimplicationsforprofessionalpracticeandpatientequity AT reinlisa improvingchilddevelopmentscreeningimplicationsforprofessionalpracticeandpatientequity AT kanterilya improvingchilddevelopmentscreeningimplicationsforprofessionalpracticeandpatientequity AT kotagirinayanika improvingchilddevelopmentscreeningimplicationsforprofessionalpracticeandpatientequity AT gundackerconstance improvingchilddevelopmentscreeningimplicationsforprofessionalpracticeandpatientequity AT tarimasergey improvingchilddevelopmentscreeningimplicationsforprofessionalpracticeandpatientequity |