Cargando…
Validity and reliability of Psychiatric Nurse Self-Efficacy Scales: cross-sectional study
OBJECTIVES: To develop the Psychiatric Nurse Self-Efficacy Scales, and to examine their reliability and validity. DESIGN: We developed the Improved Self-Efficacy Scale (ISES) and Decreased Self-Efficacy Scale (DSES) using existing evidence. Statistical analysis was conducted on the data to test reli...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8744105/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34996799 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055922 |
_version_ | 1784630050266546176 |
---|---|
author | Yada, Hironori Odachi, Ryo Adachi, Keiichiro Abe, Hiroshi Yonemoto, Fukiyo Fujiki, Toshiya Fujii, Mika Katoh, Takahiko |
author_facet | Yada, Hironori Odachi, Ryo Adachi, Keiichiro Abe, Hiroshi Yonemoto, Fukiyo Fujiki, Toshiya Fujii, Mika Katoh, Takahiko |
author_sort | Yada, Hironori |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To develop the Psychiatric Nurse Self-Efficacy Scales, and to examine their reliability and validity. DESIGN: We developed the Improved Self-Efficacy Scale (ISES) and Decreased Self-Efficacy Scale (DSES) using existing evidence. Statistical analysis was conducted on the data to test reliability and validity. SETTING: The study’s setting was psychiatric facilities in three prefectures in Japan. PARTICIPANTS: Data from 514 valid responses were extracted of the 786 responses by psychiatric nurses. OUTCOME MEASURES: The study measured the reliability and validity of the scales. RESULTS: The ISES has two factors (‘Positive changes in the patient’ and ‘Prospect of continuing in psychiatric nursing’) and the DSES has three (‘Devaluation of own role as a psychiatric nurse’, ‘Decrease in nursing ability due to overload’ and ‘Difficulty in seeing any results in psychiatric nursing’). With regard to scale reliability, the Cronbach’s alpha coefficient was 0.634–0.845. With regard to scale validity, as the factorial validity of the ISES and DSES, for the ISES, χ(2)/df (110.625/37) ratio=2.990 (p<0.001), goodness-of-fit index (GFI)=0.962, adjusted GFI (AGFI)=0.932, comparative fit index (CFI)=0.967 and root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA)=0.062; for the DSES, χ(2)/df (101.982/37) ratio=2.756 (p<0.001), GFI=0.966, AGFI=0.940, CFI=0.943, RMSEA=0.059 and Akaike Information Criterion=159.982. The concurrent validity of the General Self-Efficacy Scale was r=0.149–0.446 (p<0.01) for ISES and r=−0.154 to −0.462 (p<0.01) for DSES, and the concurrent validity of the Stress Reaction Scale was r=−0.128 to 0.168 for ISES, r=0.214–0.398 for DSES (p<0.01). Statistical analyses showed the scales to be reliable and valid measures. CONCLUSIONS: The ISES and DSES can accurately assess psychiatric nurses’ self-efficacy. Using these scales, it is possible to formulate programmes for improving psychiatric nurses’ feelings of self-efficacy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8744105 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87441052022-01-20 Validity and reliability of Psychiatric Nurse Self-Efficacy Scales: cross-sectional study Yada, Hironori Odachi, Ryo Adachi, Keiichiro Abe, Hiroshi Yonemoto, Fukiyo Fujiki, Toshiya Fujii, Mika Katoh, Takahiko BMJ Open Nursing OBJECTIVES: To develop the Psychiatric Nurse Self-Efficacy Scales, and to examine their reliability and validity. DESIGN: We developed the Improved Self-Efficacy Scale (ISES) and Decreased Self-Efficacy Scale (DSES) using existing evidence. Statistical analysis was conducted on the data to test reliability and validity. SETTING: The study’s setting was psychiatric facilities in three prefectures in Japan. PARTICIPANTS: Data from 514 valid responses were extracted of the 786 responses by psychiatric nurses. OUTCOME MEASURES: The study measured the reliability and validity of the scales. RESULTS: The ISES has two factors (‘Positive changes in the patient’ and ‘Prospect of continuing in psychiatric nursing’) and the DSES has three (‘Devaluation of own role as a psychiatric nurse’, ‘Decrease in nursing ability due to overload’ and ‘Difficulty in seeing any results in psychiatric nursing’). With regard to scale reliability, the Cronbach’s alpha coefficient was 0.634–0.845. With regard to scale validity, as the factorial validity of the ISES and DSES, for the ISES, χ(2)/df (110.625/37) ratio=2.990 (p<0.001), goodness-of-fit index (GFI)=0.962, adjusted GFI (AGFI)=0.932, comparative fit index (CFI)=0.967 and root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA)=0.062; for the DSES, χ(2)/df (101.982/37) ratio=2.756 (p<0.001), GFI=0.966, AGFI=0.940, CFI=0.943, RMSEA=0.059 and Akaike Information Criterion=159.982. The concurrent validity of the General Self-Efficacy Scale was r=0.149–0.446 (p<0.01) for ISES and r=−0.154 to −0.462 (p<0.01) for DSES, and the concurrent validity of the Stress Reaction Scale was r=−0.128 to 0.168 for ISES, r=0.214–0.398 for DSES (p<0.01). Statistical analyses showed the scales to be reliable and valid measures. CONCLUSIONS: The ISES and DSES can accurately assess psychiatric nurses’ self-efficacy. Using these scales, it is possible to formulate programmes for improving psychiatric nurses’ feelings of self-efficacy. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-01-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8744105/ /pubmed/34996799 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055922 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Nursing Yada, Hironori Odachi, Ryo Adachi, Keiichiro Abe, Hiroshi Yonemoto, Fukiyo Fujiki, Toshiya Fujii, Mika Katoh, Takahiko Validity and reliability of Psychiatric Nurse Self-Efficacy Scales: cross-sectional study |
title | Validity and reliability of Psychiatric Nurse Self-Efficacy Scales: cross-sectional study |
title_full | Validity and reliability of Psychiatric Nurse Self-Efficacy Scales: cross-sectional study |
title_fullStr | Validity and reliability of Psychiatric Nurse Self-Efficacy Scales: cross-sectional study |
title_full_unstemmed | Validity and reliability of Psychiatric Nurse Self-Efficacy Scales: cross-sectional study |
title_short | Validity and reliability of Psychiatric Nurse Self-Efficacy Scales: cross-sectional study |
title_sort | validity and reliability of psychiatric nurse self-efficacy scales: cross-sectional study |
topic | Nursing |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8744105/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34996799 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055922 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yadahironori validityandreliabilityofpsychiatricnurseselfefficacyscalescrosssectionalstudy AT odachiryo validityandreliabilityofpsychiatricnurseselfefficacyscalescrosssectionalstudy AT adachikeiichiro validityandreliabilityofpsychiatricnurseselfefficacyscalescrosssectionalstudy AT abehiroshi validityandreliabilityofpsychiatricnurseselfefficacyscalescrosssectionalstudy AT yonemotofukiyo validityandreliabilityofpsychiatricnurseselfefficacyscalescrosssectionalstudy AT fujikitoshiya validityandreliabilityofpsychiatricnurseselfefficacyscalescrosssectionalstudy AT fujiimika validityandreliabilityofpsychiatricnurseselfefficacyscalescrosssectionalstudy AT katohtakahiko validityandreliabilityofpsychiatricnurseselfefficacyscalescrosssectionalstudy |