Cargando…
The use of personal protection equipment does not negatively affect paramedics’ attention and dexterity: a prospective triple-cross over randomized controlled non-inferiority trial
BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic led to widespread use of personal protection equipment (PPE), including filtering face piece (FFP) masks, throughout the world. PPE. Previous studies indicate that PPE impairs neurocognitive performance in healthcare workers. Concerns for personnel safety have led t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8744370/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35012592 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-021-00990-3 |
_version_ | 1784630103447175168 |
---|---|
author | Kienbacher, Calvin Lukas Grafeneder, Jürgen Tscherny, Katharina Krammel, Mario Fuhrmann, Verena Niederer, Maximilian Neudorfsky, Sabine Herbich, Klaus Schreiber, Wolfgang Herkner, Harald Roth, Dominik |
author_facet | Kienbacher, Calvin Lukas Grafeneder, Jürgen Tscherny, Katharina Krammel, Mario Fuhrmann, Verena Niederer, Maximilian Neudorfsky, Sabine Herbich, Klaus Schreiber, Wolfgang Herkner, Harald Roth, Dominik |
author_sort | Kienbacher, Calvin Lukas |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic led to widespread use of personal protection equipment (PPE), including filtering face piece (FFP) masks, throughout the world. PPE. Previous studies indicate that PPE impairs neurocognitive performance in healthcare workers. Concerns for personnel safety have led to special recommendations regarding basic life support (BLS) in patients with a potential SARS-CoV-2 infection, including the use of PPE. Established instruments are available to assess attention and dexterity in BLS settings, respectively. We aimed to evaluate the influence of PPE with different types of FFP masks on these two neuropsychological components of EMS personnel during BLS. METHODS: This was a randomized controlled non-inferiority triple-crossover study. Teams of paramedics completed three 12-min long BLS scenarios on a manikin after having climbed three flights of stairs with equipment, each in three experimental conditions: (a) without pandemic PPE, (b) with PPE including a FFP2 mask with an expiration valve and (c) with PPE including an FFP2 mask without an expiration valve. The teams and intervention sequences were randomized. We measured the shift in concentration performance using the d2 test and dexterity using the nine-hole peg test (NHPT). We compared results between the three conditions. For the primary outcome, the non-inferiority margin was set at 20 points. RESULTS: Forty-eight paramedics participated. Concentration performance was significantly better after each scenario, with no differences noted between groups: d2 shift control versus with valve − 8.3 (95% CI − 19.4 to 2.7) points; control versus without valve − 8.5 (− 19.7 to 2.7) points; with valve versus without valve 0.1 (− 11.1 to 11.3) points. Similar results were found for the NHPT: + 0.3 (− 0.7 to 1.4), − 0.4 (− 1.4 to 0.7), 0.7 (− 0.4 to 1.8) s respectively. CONCLUSION: Attention increases when performing BLS. Attention and dexterity are not inferior when wearing PPE, including FFP2 masks. PPE should be used on a low-threshold basis. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8744370 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87443702022-01-10 The use of personal protection equipment does not negatively affect paramedics’ attention and dexterity: a prospective triple-cross over randomized controlled non-inferiority trial Kienbacher, Calvin Lukas Grafeneder, Jürgen Tscherny, Katharina Krammel, Mario Fuhrmann, Verena Niederer, Maximilian Neudorfsky, Sabine Herbich, Klaus Schreiber, Wolfgang Herkner, Harald Roth, Dominik Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med Original Research BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic led to widespread use of personal protection equipment (PPE), including filtering face piece (FFP) masks, throughout the world. PPE. Previous studies indicate that PPE impairs neurocognitive performance in healthcare workers. Concerns for personnel safety have led to special recommendations regarding basic life support (BLS) in patients with a potential SARS-CoV-2 infection, including the use of PPE. Established instruments are available to assess attention and dexterity in BLS settings, respectively. We aimed to evaluate the influence of PPE with different types of FFP masks on these two neuropsychological components of EMS personnel during BLS. METHODS: This was a randomized controlled non-inferiority triple-crossover study. Teams of paramedics completed three 12-min long BLS scenarios on a manikin after having climbed three flights of stairs with equipment, each in three experimental conditions: (a) without pandemic PPE, (b) with PPE including a FFP2 mask with an expiration valve and (c) with PPE including an FFP2 mask without an expiration valve. The teams and intervention sequences were randomized. We measured the shift in concentration performance using the d2 test and dexterity using the nine-hole peg test (NHPT). We compared results between the three conditions. For the primary outcome, the non-inferiority margin was set at 20 points. RESULTS: Forty-eight paramedics participated. Concentration performance was significantly better after each scenario, with no differences noted between groups: d2 shift control versus with valve − 8.3 (95% CI − 19.4 to 2.7) points; control versus without valve − 8.5 (− 19.7 to 2.7) points; with valve versus without valve 0.1 (− 11.1 to 11.3) points. Similar results were found for the NHPT: + 0.3 (− 0.7 to 1.4), − 0.4 (− 1.4 to 0.7), 0.7 (− 0.4 to 1.8) s respectively. CONCLUSION: Attention increases when performing BLS. Attention and dexterity are not inferior when wearing PPE, including FFP2 masks. PPE should be used on a low-threshold basis. BioMed Central 2022-01-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8744370/ /pubmed/35012592 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-021-00990-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Kienbacher, Calvin Lukas Grafeneder, Jürgen Tscherny, Katharina Krammel, Mario Fuhrmann, Verena Niederer, Maximilian Neudorfsky, Sabine Herbich, Klaus Schreiber, Wolfgang Herkner, Harald Roth, Dominik The use of personal protection equipment does not negatively affect paramedics’ attention and dexterity: a prospective triple-cross over randomized controlled non-inferiority trial |
title | The use of personal protection equipment does not negatively affect paramedics’ attention and dexterity: a prospective triple-cross over randomized controlled non-inferiority trial |
title_full | The use of personal protection equipment does not negatively affect paramedics’ attention and dexterity: a prospective triple-cross over randomized controlled non-inferiority trial |
title_fullStr | The use of personal protection equipment does not negatively affect paramedics’ attention and dexterity: a prospective triple-cross over randomized controlled non-inferiority trial |
title_full_unstemmed | The use of personal protection equipment does not negatively affect paramedics’ attention and dexterity: a prospective triple-cross over randomized controlled non-inferiority trial |
title_short | The use of personal protection equipment does not negatively affect paramedics’ attention and dexterity: a prospective triple-cross over randomized controlled non-inferiority trial |
title_sort | use of personal protection equipment does not negatively affect paramedics’ attention and dexterity: a prospective triple-cross over randomized controlled non-inferiority trial |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8744370/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35012592 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-021-00990-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kienbachercalvinlukas theuseofpersonalprotectionequipmentdoesnotnegativelyaffectparamedicsattentionanddexterityaprospectivetriplecrossoverrandomizedcontrollednoninferioritytrial AT grafenederjurgen theuseofpersonalprotectionequipmentdoesnotnegativelyaffectparamedicsattentionanddexterityaprospectivetriplecrossoverrandomizedcontrollednoninferioritytrial AT tschernykatharina theuseofpersonalprotectionequipmentdoesnotnegativelyaffectparamedicsattentionanddexterityaprospectivetriplecrossoverrandomizedcontrollednoninferioritytrial AT krammelmario theuseofpersonalprotectionequipmentdoesnotnegativelyaffectparamedicsattentionanddexterityaprospectivetriplecrossoverrandomizedcontrollednoninferioritytrial AT fuhrmannverena theuseofpersonalprotectionequipmentdoesnotnegativelyaffectparamedicsattentionanddexterityaprospectivetriplecrossoverrandomizedcontrollednoninferioritytrial AT niederermaximilian theuseofpersonalprotectionequipmentdoesnotnegativelyaffectparamedicsattentionanddexterityaprospectivetriplecrossoverrandomizedcontrollednoninferioritytrial AT neudorfskysabine theuseofpersonalprotectionequipmentdoesnotnegativelyaffectparamedicsattentionanddexterityaprospectivetriplecrossoverrandomizedcontrollednoninferioritytrial AT herbichklaus theuseofpersonalprotectionequipmentdoesnotnegativelyaffectparamedicsattentionanddexterityaprospectivetriplecrossoverrandomizedcontrollednoninferioritytrial AT schreiberwolfgang theuseofpersonalprotectionequipmentdoesnotnegativelyaffectparamedicsattentionanddexterityaprospectivetriplecrossoverrandomizedcontrollednoninferioritytrial AT herknerharald theuseofpersonalprotectionequipmentdoesnotnegativelyaffectparamedicsattentionanddexterityaprospectivetriplecrossoverrandomizedcontrollednoninferioritytrial AT rothdominik theuseofpersonalprotectionequipmentdoesnotnegativelyaffectparamedicsattentionanddexterityaprospectivetriplecrossoverrandomizedcontrollednoninferioritytrial AT kienbachercalvinlukas useofpersonalprotectionequipmentdoesnotnegativelyaffectparamedicsattentionanddexterityaprospectivetriplecrossoverrandomizedcontrollednoninferioritytrial AT grafenederjurgen useofpersonalprotectionequipmentdoesnotnegativelyaffectparamedicsattentionanddexterityaprospectivetriplecrossoverrandomizedcontrollednoninferioritytrial AT tschernykatharina useofpersonalprotectionequipmentdoesnotnegativelyaffectparamedicsattentionanddexterityaprospectivetriplecrossoverrandomizedcontrollednoninferioritytrial AT krammelmario useofpersonalprotectionequipmentdoesnotnegativelyaffectparamedicsattentionanddexterityaprospectivetriplecrossoverrandomizedcontrollednoninferioritytrial AT fuhrmannverena useofpersonalprotectionequipmentdoesnotnegativelyaffectparamedicsattentionanddexterityaprospectivetriplecrossoverrandomizedcontrollednoninferioritytrial AT niederermaximilian useofpersonalprotectionequipmentdoesnotnegativelyaffectparamedicsattentionanddexterityaprospectivetriplecrossoverrandomizedcontrollednoninferioritytrial AT neudorfskysabine useofpersonalprotectionequipmentdoesnotnegativelyaffectparamedicsattentionanddexterityaprospectivetriplecrossoverrandomizedcontrollednoninferioritytrial AT herbichklaus useofpersonalprotectionequipmentdoesnotnegativelyaffectparamedicsattentionanddexterityaprospectivetriplecrossoverrandomizedcontrollednoninferioritytrial AT schreiberwolfgang useofpersonalprotectionequipmentdoesnotnegativelyaffectparamedicsattentionanddexterityaprospectivetriplecrossoverrandomizedcontrollednoninferioritytrial AT herknerharald useofpersonalprotectionequipmentdoesnotnegativelyaffectparamedicsattentionanddexterityaprospectivetriplecrossoverrandomizedcontrollednoninferioritytrial AT rothdominik useofpersonalprotectionequipmentdoesnotnegativelyaffectparamedicsattentionanddexterityaprospectivetriplecrossoverrandomizedcontrollednoninferioritytrial |