Cargando…
Public Understanding of Coercive Control in Northern Ireland
Coercive control is characterised by negative behaviours which intimidate, threaten, and humiliate a person or restrict a person’s liberty. In addition to being a known risk factor for experiencing other forms of violence, research has linked coercive control to symptoms of psychological distress an...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8744385/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35035065 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10896-021-00355-5 |
_version_ | 1784630107244068864 |
---|---|
author | Lagdon, Susan Jordan, Julie-Ann Devine, Paula Tully, Mark A. Armour, Cherie Shannon, Ciaran |
author_facet | Lagdon, Susan Jordan, Julie-Ann Devine, Paula Tully, Mark A. Armour, Cherie Shannon, Ciaran |
author_sort | Lagdon, Susan |
collection | PubMed |
description | Coercive control is characterised by negative behaviours which intimidate, threaten, and humiliate a person or restrict a person’s liberty. In addition to being a known risk factor for experiencing other forms of violence, research has linked coercive control to symptoms of psychological distress and suicidality. In the UK, coercive and controlling behaviours within intimate and familial relationships have been legislated as offending behaviours. However, there still exists a lack of international evidence on wider public knowledge and understanding of coercive control. The Northern Ireland Life and Times Survey (NILT) is an annual cross-sectional representative survey of social policy topics. Participants are adults aged 18 years or over. Concerning coercive control, respondents were presented with two relationship scenarios: obvious and less obvious coercive control. Following each scenario, respondents indicated their level of agreement to ten statements covering attitudes towards coercive control, victims of coercive control, talking about coercive control, and whether coercive control is a crime. Respondents indicated whether they had heard of the term ‘coercive control’. Predictors of coercive control awareness were assessed using multinomial logistic regression. Mixed analysis of variance assessed if agreement levels to the ten statements varied by type of coercive control and victim gender. Most respondents said that they had heard of the term coercive control and knew what it meant. Those who had not heard of coercive control at all were more likely to be on a lower income, less qualified and younger, when compared to those who said they knew what the term meant. Significant interactions between coercive control type and victim gender were evident for all ten statements. While most respondents are aware of the term coercive control, a significant number have not and are therefore unlikely to recognise the signs of this type of abuse. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8744385 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87443852022-01-10 Public Understanding of Coercive Control in Northern Ireland Lagdon, Susan Jordan, Julie-Ann Devine, Paula Tully, Mark A. Armour, Cherie Shannon, Ciaran J Fam Violence Original Article Coercive control is characterised by negative behaviours which intimidate, threaten, and humiliate a person or restrict a person’s liberty. In addition to being a known risk factor for experiencing other forms of violence, research has linked coercive control to symptoms of psychological distress and suicidality. In the UK, coercive and controlling behaviours within intimate and familial relationships have been legislated as offending behaviours. However, there still exists a lack of international evidence on wider public knowledge and understanding of coercive control. The Northern Ireland Life and Times Survey (NILT) is an annual cross-sectional representative survey of social policy topics. Participants are adults aged 18 years or over. Concerning coercive control, respondents were presented with two relationship scenarios: obvious and less obvious coercive control. Following each scenario, respondents indicated their level of agreement to ten statements covering attitudes towards coercive control, victims of coercive control, talking about coercive control, and whether coercive control is a crime. Respondents indicated whether they had heard of the term ‘coercive control’. Predictors of coercive control awareness were assessed using multinomial logistic regression. Mixed analysis of variance assessed if agreement levels to the ten statements varied by type of coercive control and victim gender. Most respondents said that they had heard of the term coercive control and knew what it meant. Those who had not heard of coercive control at all were more likely to be on a lower income, less qualified and younger, when compared to those who said they knew what the term meant. Significant interactions between coercive control type and victim gender were evident for all ten statements. While most respondents are aware of the term coercive control, a significant number have not and are therefore unlikely to recognise the signs of this type of abuse. Springer US 2022-01-10 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC8744385/ /pubmed/35035065 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10896-021-00355-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Lagdon, Susan Jordan, Julie-Ann Devine, Paula Tully, Mark A. Armour, Cherie Shannon, Ciaran Public Understanding of Coercive Control in Northern Ireland |
title | Public Understanding of Coercive Control in Northern Ireland |
title_full | Public Understanding of Coercive Control in Northern Ireland |
title_fullStr | Public Understanding of Coercive Control in Northern Ireland |
title_full_unstemmed | Public Understanding of Coercive Control in Northern Ireland |
title_short | Public Understanding of Coercive Control in Northern Ireland |
title_sort | public understanding of coercive control in northern ireland |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8744385/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35035065 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10896-021-00355-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lagdonsusan publicunderstandingofcoercivecontrolinnorthernireland AT jordanjulieann publicunderstandingofcoercivecontrolinnorthernireland AT devinepaula publicunderstandingofcoercivecontrolinnorthernireland AT tullymarka publicunderstandingofcoercivecontrolinnorthernireland AT armourcherie publicunderstandingofcoercivecontrolinnorthernireland AT shannonciaran publicunderstandingofcoercivecontrolinnorthernireland |