Cargando…
Predictors of Higher Quality of Systematic Reviews Addressing Nutrition and Cancer Prevention
Systematic reviews/meta-analyses (SR/MAs) are considered a reliable source of information in healthcare. We aimed to explore the association of several characteristics of SR/MAs addressing nutrition in cancer prevention and their quality/risk of bias (using assessments from AMSTAR-2 and ROBIS tools)...
Autores principales: | Storman, Dawid, Koperny, Magdalena, Zając, Joanna, Polak, Maciej, Weglarz, Paulina, Bochenek-Cibor, Justyna, Swierz, Mateusz J., Staskiewicz, Wojciech, Gorecka, Magdalena, Skuza, Anna, Wach, Adam A., Kaluzinska, Klaudia, Bała, Małgorzata M. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8744691/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35010766 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19010506 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Are systematic reviews addressing nutrition for cancer prevention trustworthy? A systematic survey of quality and risk of bias
por: Zajac, Joanna F, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Similarities, reliability and gaps in assessing the quality of conduct of systematic reviews using AMSTAR-2 and ROBIS: systematic survey of nutrition reviews
por: Swierz, Mateusz J., et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Support for Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients—a Systematic Review
por: Bochenek-Cibor, Justyna, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Psychological Interventions and Bariatric Surgery among People with Clinically Severe Obesity—A Systematic Review with Bayesian Meta-Analysis
por: Storman, Dawid, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Factors Associated with Satisfaction of Hospital Physicians: A Systematic Review on European Data
por: Domagała, Alicja, et al.
Publicado: (2018)