Cargando…

Digital Health Interventions by Clinical Pharmacists: A Systematic Review

Integrating digital interventions in healthcare has gained increasing popularity among clinical pharmacists (CPs) due to advances in technology. The purpose of this study was to systematically review CP-led digital interventions to improve patients’ health-related clinical outcomes. PubMed and the C...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Park, Taehwan, Muzumdar, Jagannath, Kim, Hyemin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8744767/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35010791
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19010532
_version_ 1784630187420286976
author Park, Taehwan
Muzumdar, Jagannath
Kim, Hyemin
author_facet Park, Taehwan
Muzumdar, Jagannath
Kim, Hyemin
author_sort Park, Taehwan
collection PubMed
description Integrating digital interventions in healthcare has gained increasing popularity among clinical pharmacists (CPs) due to advances in technology. The purpose of this study was to systematically review CP-led digital interventions to improve patients’ health-related clinical outcomes. PubMed and the Cochrane Database were searched to select studies that had conducted a randomized controlled trial to evaluate clinical outcomes in adults following a CP-led digital intervention for the period from January 2005 to August 2021. A total of 19 studies were included in our analysis. In these 19 studies, the most commonly used digital intervention by CPs was telephone use (n = 15), followed by a web-based tool (n = 2) and a mobile app (n = 2). These interventions were provided to serve a wide range of purposes in patients’ outcomes: change in lab values (e.g., blood pressure, HbA1c) (n = 23), reduction in health service use (n = 8), enhancing adherence (n = 6), improvement in drug-related outcomes (n = 6), increase in survival (n = 3), and reduction in health-related risk (e.g., CVD risk) (n = 2). Although the impacts of telephone-based interventions on patients’ outcomes were decidedly mixed, web-based interventions and mobile apps exerted generally positive influences. To date, little research has investigated the cost-effectiveness of digital interventions. Future studies are warranted.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8744767
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87447672022-01-11 Digital Health Interventions by Clinical Pharmacists: A Systematic Review Park, Taehwan Muzumdar, Jagannath Kim, Hyemin Int J Environ Res Public Health Review Integrating digital interventions in healthcare has gained increasing popularity among clinical pharmacists (CPs) due to advances in technology. The purpose of this study was to systematically review CP-led digital interventions to improve patients’ health-related clinical outcomes. PubMed and the Cochrane Database were searched to select studies that had conducted a randomized controlled trial to evaluate clinical outcomes in adults following a CP-led digital intervention for the period from January 2005 to August 2021. A total of 19 studies were included in our analysis. In these 19 studies, the most commonly used digital intervention by CPs was telephone use (n = 15), followed by a web-based tool (n = 2) and a mobile app (n = 2). These interventions were provided to serve a wide range of purposes in patients’ outcomes: change in lab values (e.g., blood pressure, HbA1c) (n = 23), reduction in health service use (n = 8), enhancing adherence (n = 6), improvement in drug-related outcomes (n = 6), increase in survival (n = 3), and reduction in health-related risk (e.g., CVD risk) (n = 2). Although the impacts of telephone-based interventions on patients’ outcomes were decidedly mixed, web-based interventions and mobile apps exerted generally positive influences. To date, little research has investigated the cost-effectiveness of digital interventions. Future studies are warranted. MDPI 2022-01-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8744767/ /pubmed/35010791 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19010532 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Park, Taehwan
Muzumdar, Jagannath
Kim, Hyemin
Digital Health Interventions by Clinical Pharmacists: A Systematic Review
title Digital Health Interventions by Clinical Pharmacists: A Systematic Review
title_full Digital Health Interventions by Clinical Pharmacists: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Digital Health Interventions by Clinical Pharmacists: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Digital Health Interventions by Clinical Pharmacists: A Systematic Review
title_short Digital Health Interventions by Clinical Pharmacists: A Systematic Review
title_sort digital health interventions by clinical pharmacists: a systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8744767/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35010791
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19010532
work_keys_str_mv AT parktaehwan digitalhealthinterventionsbyclinicalpharmacistsasystematicreview
AT muzumdarjagannath digitalhealthinterventionsbyclinicalpharmacistsasystematicreview
AT kimhyemin digitalhealthinterventionsbyclinicalpharmacistsasystematicreview