Cargando…

Health Equity and a Paradigm Shift in Occupational Safety and Health

Despite significant improvements in occupational safety and health (OSH) over the past 50 years, there remain persistent inequities in the burden of injuries and illnesses. In this commentary, the authors assert that addressing these inequities, along with challenges associated with the fundamental...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Flynn, Michael A., Check, Pietra, Steege, Andrea L., Sivén, Jacqueline M., Syron, Laura N.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8744812/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35010608
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19010349
_version_ 1784630198915825664
author Flynn, Michael A.
Check, Pietra
Steege, Andrea L.
Sivén, Jacqueline M.
Syron, Laura N.
author_facet Flynn, Michael A.
Check, Pietra
Steege, Andrea L.
Sivén, Jacqueline M.
Syron, Laura N.
author_sort Flynn, Michael A.
collection PubMed
description Despite significant improvements in occupational safety and health (OSH) over the past 50 years, there remain persistent inequities in the burden of injuries and illnesses. In this commentary, the authors assert that addressing these inequities, along with challenges associated with the fundamental reorganization of work, will require a more holistic approach that accounts for the social contexts within which occupational injuries and illnesses occur. A biopsychosocial approach explores the dynamic, multidirectional interactions between biological phenomena, psychological factors, and social contexts, and can be a tool for both deeper understanding of the social determinants of health and advancing health equity. This commentary suggests that reducing inequities will require OSH to adopt the biopsychosocial paradigm. Practices in at least three key areas will need to adopt this shift. Research that explicitly examines occupational health inequities should do more to elucidate the effects of social arrangements and the interaction of work with other social determinants on work-related risks, exposures, and outcomes. OSH studies regardless of focus should incorporate inclusive methods for recruitment, data collection, and analysis to reflect societal diversity and account for differing experiences of social conditions. OSH researchers should work across disciplines to integrate work into the broader health equity research agenda.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8744812
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87448122022-01-11 Health Equity and a Paradigm Shift in Occupational Safety and Health Flynn, Michael A. Check, Pietra Steege, Andrea L. Sivén, Jacqueline M. Syron, Laura N. Int J Environ Res Public Health Commentary Despite significant improvements in occupational safety and health (OSH) over the past 50 years, there remain persistent inequities in the burden of injuries and illnesses. In this commentary, the authors assert that addressing these inequities, along with challenges associated with the fundamental reorganization of work, will require a more holistic approach that accounts for the social contexts within which occupational injuries and illnesses occur. A biopsychosocial approach explores the dynamic, multidirectional interactions between biological phenomena, psychological factors, and social contexts, and can be a tool for both deeper understanding of the social determinants of health and advancing health equity. This commentary suggests that reducing inequities will require OSH to adopt the biopsychosocial paradigm. Practices in at least three key areas will need to adopt this shift. Research that explicitly examines occupational health inequities should do more to elucidate the effects of social arrangements and the interaction of work with other social determinants on work-related risks, exposures, and outcomes. OSH studies regardless of focus should incorporate inclusive methods for recruitment, data collection, and analysis to reflect societal diversity and account for differing experiences of social conditions. OSH researchers should work across disciplines to integrate work into the broader health equity research agenda. MDPI 2021-12-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8744812/ /pubmed/35010608 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19010349 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Commentary
Flynn, Michael A.
Check, Pietra
Steege, Andrea L.
Sivén, Jacqueline M.
Syron, Laura N.
Health Equity and a Paradigm Shift in Occupational Safety and Health
title Health Equity and a Paradigm Shift in Occupational Safety and Health
title_full Health Equity and a Paradigm Shift in Occupational Safety and Health
title_fullStr Health Equity and a Paradigm Shift in Occupational Safety and Health
title_full_unstemmed Health Equity and a Paradigm Shift in Occupational Safety and Health
title_short Health Equity and a Paradigm Shift in Occupational Safety and Health
title_sort health equity and a paradigm shift in occupational safety and health
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8744812/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35010608
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19010349
work_keys_str_mv AT flynnmichaela healthequityandaparadigmshiftinoccupationalsafetyandhealth
AT checkpietra healthequityandaparadigmshiftinoccupationalsafetyandhealth
AT steegeandreal healthequityandaparadigmshiftinoccupationalsafetyandhealth
AT sivenjacquelinem healthequityandaparadigmshiftinoccupationalsafetyandhealth
AT syronlauran healthequityandaparadigmshiftinoccupationalsafetyandhealth