Cargando…

Effectiveness of S-O Clip-Assisted Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection

This study aimed to assess the utility of the S-O clip during colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). We conducted a retrospective study on 185 patients who underwent colorectal ESD from January 2015 to January 2020. The patients were divided into two groups: before and after the introduc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fujinami, Haruka, Teramoto, Akira, Takahashi, Saeko, Ando, Takayuki, Kajiura, Shinya, Yasuda, Ichiro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8745244/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35011881
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11010141
_version_ 1784630297659179008
author Fujinami, Haruka
Teramoto, Akira
Takahashi, Saeko
Ando, Takayuki
Kajiura, Shinya
Yasuda, Ichiro
author_facet Fujinami, Haruka
Teramoto, Akira
Takahashi, Saeko
Ando, Takayuki
Kajiura, Shinya
Yasuda, Ichiro
author_sort Fujinami, Haruka
collection PubMed
description This study aimed to assess the utility of the S-O clip during colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). We conducted a retrospective study on 185 patients who underwent colorectal ESD from January 2015 to January 2020. The patients were divided into two groups: before and after the introduction of the S-O clip. Forty-two patients underwent conventional ESD (CO group) and 29 patients underwent ESD using the S-O clip (SO group). We compared the surgery duration, dissection speed, en bloc resection rate, and complication rate between both groups. Compared with the CO group, the SO group had a significantly shorter surgery duration (70.7 ± 37.9 min vs. 51.2 ± 18.6 min; p = 0.017), a significantly higher dissection speed (15.1 ± 9.0 min vs. 26.3 ± 13.8 min; p < 0.001), a significantly higher en bloc resection rate (80.9% vs. 98.8%; p ≤ 0.001), and a significantly lower perforation rate (4.3% vs. 1.3%). In the right colon, the surgery duration was significantly shorter and the dissection speed was significantly higher in the SO group than in the CO group. Moreover, the rate of en bloc resection improved significantly in the right colon. S-O clip-assisted ESD reduces the procedure time and improves the treatment effects, especially in the right colon.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8745244
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87452442022-01-11 Effectiveness of S-O Clip-Assisted Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Fujinami, Haruka Teramoto, Akira Takahashi, Saeko Ando, Takayuki Kajiura, Shinya Yasuda, Ichiro J Clin Med Article This study aimed to assess the utility of the S-O clip during colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). We conducted a retrospective study on 185 patients who underwent colorectal ESD from January 2015 to January 2020. The patients were divided into two groups: before and after the introduction of the S-O clip. Forty-two patients underwent conventional ESD (CO group) and 29 patients underwent ESD using the S-O clip (SO group). We compared the surgery duration, dissection speed, en bloc resection rate, and complication rate between both groups. Compared with the CO group, the SO group had a significantly shorter surgery duration (70.7 ± 37.9 min vs. 51.2 ± 18.6 min; p = 0.017), a significantly higher dissection speed (15.1 ± 9.0 min vs. 26.3 ± 13.8 min; p < 0.001), a significantly higher en bloc resection rate (80.9% vs. 98.8%; p ≤ 0.001), and a significantly lower perforation rate (4.3% vs. 1.3%). In the right colon, the surgery duration was significantly shorter and the dissection speed was significantly higher in the SO group than in the CO group. Moreover, the rate of en bloc resection improved significantly in the right colon. S-O clip-assisted ESD reduces the procedure time and improves the treatment effects, especially in the right colon. MDPI 2021-12-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8745244/ /pubmed/35011881 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11010141 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Fujinami, Haruka
Teramoto, Akira
Takahashi, Saeko
Ando, Takayuki
Kajiura, Shinya
Yasuda, Ichiro
Effectiveness of S-O Clip-Assisted Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection
title Effectiveness of S-O Clip-Assisted Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection
title_full Effectiveness of S-O Clip-Assisted Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection
title_fullStr Effectiveness of S-O Clip-Assisted Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of S-O Clip-Assisted Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection
title_short Effectiveness of S-O Clip-Assisted Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection
title_sort effectiveness of s-o clip-assisted colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8745244/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35011881
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11010141
work_keys_str_mv AT fujinamiharuka effectivenessofsoclipassistedcolorectalendoscopicsubmucosaldissection
AT teramotoakira effectivenessofsoclipassistedcolorectalendoscopicsubmucosaldissection
AT takahashisaeko effectivenessofsoclipassistedcolorectalendoscopicsubmucosaldissection
AT andotakayuki effectivenessofsoclipassistedcolorectalendoscopicsubmucosaldissection
AT kajiurashinya effectivenessofsoclipassistedcolorectalendoscopicsubmucosaldissection
AT yasudaichiro effectivenessofsoclipassistedcolorectalendoscopicsubmucosaldissection