Cargando…
Assessing the drug resistance profiles of oral probiotic lozenges
BACKGROUND: Probiotic lozenges have been developed to harvest the benefits of probiotics for oral health, but their long-term consumption may encourage the transfer of resistance genes from probiotics to commensals, and eventually to disease-causing bacteria. AIM: To screen commercial probiotic loze...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8745366/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35024089 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20002297.2021.2019992 |
_version_ | 1784630328137089024 |
---|---|
author | Wang, Yi Dong, Jingya Wang, Junyi Chi, Wei Zhou, Wei Tian, Qiwen Hong, Yue Zhou, Xuan Ye, Hailv Tian, Xuechen Hu, Rongdang Wong, Aloysius |
author_facet | Wang, Yi Dong, Jingya Wang, Junyi Chi, Wei Zhou, Wei Tian, Qiwen Hong, Yue Zhou, Xuan Ye, Hailv Tian, Xuechen Hu, Rongdang Wong, Aloysius |
author_sort | Wang, Yi |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Probiotic lozenges have been developed to harvest the benefits of probiotics for oral health, but their long-term consumption may encourage the transfer of resistance genes from probiotics to commensals, and eventually to disease-causing bacteria. AIM: To screen commercial probiotic lozenges for resistance to antibiotics, characterize the resistance determinants, and examine their transferability in vitro. RESULTS: Probiotics of all lozenges were resistant to glycopeptide, sulfonamide, and penicillin antibiotics, while some were resistant to aminoglycosides and cephalosporins. High minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were detected for streptomycin (>128 µg/mL) and chloramphenicol (> 512 µg/mL) for all probiotics but only one was resistant to piperacillin (MIC = 32 µg/mL). PCR analysis detected erythromycin (erm(T), ermB or mefA) and fluoroquinolone (parC or gyr(A)) resistance genes in some lozenges although there were no resistant phenotypes. The dfrD, cat-TC, vatE, aadE, vanX, and aph(3”)-III or ant(2”)-I genes conferring resistance to trimethoprim, chloramphenicol, quinupristin/dalfopristin, vancomycin, and streptomycin, respectively, were detected in resistant probiotics. The rifampicin resistance gene rpoB was also present. We found no conjugal transfer of streptomycin resistance genes in our co-incubation experiments. CONCLUSION: Our study represents the first antibiotic resistance profiling of probiotics from oral lozenges, thus highlighting the health risk especially in the prevailing threat of drug resistance globally. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8745366 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Taylor & Francis |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87453662022-01-11 Assessing the drug resistance profiles of oral probiotic lozenges Wang, Yi Dong, Jingya Wang, Junyi Chi, Wei Zhou, Wei Tian, Qiwen Hong, Yue Zhou, Xuan Ye, Hailv Tian, Xuechen Hu, Rongdang Wong, Aloysius J Oral Microbiol Original Article BACKGROUND: Probiotic lozenges have been developed to harvest the benefits of probiotics for oral health, but their long-term consumption may encourage the transfer of resistance genes from probiotics to commensals, and eventually to disease-causing bacteria. AIM: To screen commercial probiotic lozenges for resistance to antibiotics, characterize the resistance determinants, and examine their transferability in vitro. RESULTS: Probiotics of all lozenges were resistant to glycopeptide, sulfonamide, and penicillin antibiotics, while some were resistant to aminoglycosides and cephalosporins. High minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were detected for streptomycin (>128 µg/mL) and chloramphenicol (> 512 µg/mL) for all probiotics but only one was resistant to piperacillin (MIC = 32 µg/mL). PCR analysis detected erythromycin (erm(T), ermB or mefA) and fluoroquinolone (parC or gyr(A)) resistance genes in some lozenges although there were no resistant phenotypes. The dfrD, cat-TC, vatE, aadE, vanX, and aph(3”)-III or ant(2”)-I genes conferring resistance to trimethoprim, chloramphenicol, quinupristin/dalfopristin, vancomycin, and streptomycin, respectively, were detected in resistant probiotics. The rifampicin resistance gene rpoB was also present. We found no conjugal transfer of streptomycin resistance genes in our co-incubation experiments. CONCLUSION: Our study represents the first antibiotic resistance profiling of probiotics from oral lozenges, thus highlighting the health risk especially in the prevailing threat of drug resistance globally. Taylor & Francis 2022-01-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8745366/ /pubmed/35024089 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20002297.2021.2019992 Text en © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Wang, Yi Dong, Jingya Wang, Junyi Chi, Wei Zhou, Wei Tian, Qiwen Hong, Yue Zhou, Xuan Ye, Hailv Tian, Xuechen Hu, Rongdang Wong, Aloysius Assessing the drug resistance profiles of oral probiotic lozenges |
title | Assessing the drug resistance profiles of oral probiotic lozenges |
title_full | Assessing the drug resistance profiles of oral probiotic lozenges |
title_fullStr | Assessing the drug resistance profiles of oral probiotic lozenges |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessing the drug resistance profiles of oral probiotic lozenges |
title_short | Assessing the drug resistance profiles of oral probiotic lozenges |
title_sort | assessing the drug resistance profiles of oral probiotic lozenges |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8745366/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35024089 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20002297.2021.2019992 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wangyi assessingthedrugresistanceprofilesoforalprobioticlozenges AT dongjingya assessingthedrugresistanceprofilesoforalprobioticlozenges AT wangjunyi assessingthedrugresistanceprofilesoforalprobioticlozenges AT chiwei assessingthedrugresistanceprofilesoforalprobioticlozenges AT zhouwei assessingthedrugresistanceprofilesoforalprobioticlozenges AT tianqiwen assessingthedrugresistanceprofilesoforalprobioticlozenges AT hongyue assessingthedrugresistanceprofilesoforalprobioticlozenges AT zhouxuan assessingthedrugresistanceprofilesoforalprobioticlozenges AT yehailv assessingthedrugresistanceprofilesoforalprobioticlozenges AT tianxuechen assessingthedrugresistanceprofilesoforalprobioticlozenges AT hurongdang assessingthedrugresistanceprofilesoforalprobioticlozenges AT wongaloysius assessingthedrugresistanceprofilesoforalprobioticlozenges |