Cargando…

Operator Performance of the Digital Setup Fabrication for Orthodontic–Orthognathic Treatment: An Explorative Study

The purpose of this study was to explore the operator performance of the fabrication of digital orthodontic setups integrated into cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans. Fifteen patients who underwent a combined orthodontic–orthognathic surgical treatment were included. The pre-treatment digita...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de Waard, Olivier, Bruggink, Robin, Baan, Frank, Reukers, Hendrikus A. J., Bronkhorst, Ewald M., Kuijpers-Jagtman, Anne Marie, Ongkosuwito, Edwin M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8745578/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35011886
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11010145
_version_ 1784630379242586112
author de Waard, Olivier
Bruggink, Robin
Baan, Frank
Reukers, Hendrikus A. J.
Bronkhorst, Ewald M.
Kuijpers-Jagtman, Anne Marie
Ongkosuwito, Edwin M.
author_facet de Waard, Olivier
Bruggink, Robin
Baan, Frank
Reukers, Hendrikus A. J.
Bronkhorst, Ewald M.
Kuijpers-Jagtman, Anne Marie
Ongkosuwito, Edwin M.
author_sort de Waard, Olivier
collection PubMed
description The purpose of this study was to explore the operator performance of the fabrication of digital orthodontic setups integrated into cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans. Fifteen patients who underwent a combined orthodontic–orthognathic surgical treatment were included. The pre-treatment digital dental models and CBCT scans were fused, and four operators made virtual setups twice for all patients. Differences between the virtual setups were calculated by recording tooth crown movement from the pre-treatment model to the virtual setup. To examine performance, Pearson’s correlation coefficients, duplicate measurement errors, and inter-operator differences were calculated. For intra-operator performance, correlation values varied among tooth types, with mean correlation values from 0.66 to 0.83 for the maxilla and 0.70 to 0.83 for the mandible. For inter-operator performance, mean correlation values varied from 0.40 to 0.87 for the maxilla and from 0.44 to 0.80 for the mandible. Rotational mean differences exceeded the range of clinical acceptance (>2 degrees) at 18% for the maxilla and 20.8% for the mandible, and translational mean differences exceeded the range of clinical acceptance (0.6 mm) at 9.7% and 26% for the maxilla and mandible, respectively. The intra- and inter-operator performance of digital orthodontic setup construction for virtual three-dimensional orthognathic planning shows significant errors.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8745578
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87455782022-01-11 Operator Performance of the Digital Setup Fabrication for Orthodontic–Orthognathic Treatment: An Explorative Study de Waard, Olivier Bruggink, Robin Baan, Frank Reukers, Hendrikus A. J. Bronkhorst, Ewald M. Kuijpers-Jagtman, Anne Marie Ongkosuwito, Edwin M. J Clin Med Article The purpose of this study was to explore the operator performance of the fabrication of digital orthodontic setups integrated into cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans. Fifteen patients who underwent a combined orthodontic–orthognathic surgical treatment were included. The pre-treatment digital dental models and CBCT scans were fused, and four operators made virtual setups twice for all patients. Differences between the virtual setups were calculated by recording tooth crown movement from the pre-treatment model to the virtual setup. To examine performance, Pearson’s correlation coefficients, duplicate measurement errors, and inter-operator differences were calculated. For intra-operator performance, correlation values varied among tooth types, with mean correlation values from 0.66 to 0.83 for the maxilla and 0.70 to 0.83 for the mandible. For inter-operator performance, mean correlation values varied from 0.40 to 0.87 for the maxilla and from 0.44 to 0.80 for the mandible. Rotational mean differences exceeded the range of clinical acceptance (>2 degrees) at 18% for the maxilla and 20.8% for the mandible, and translational mean differences exceeded the range of clinical acceptance (0.6 mm) at 9.7% and 26% for the maxilla and mandible, respectively. The intra- and inter-operator performance of digital orthodontic setup construction for virtual three-dimensional orthognathic planning shows significant errors. MDPI 2021-12-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8745578/ /pubmed/35011886 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11010145 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
de Waard, Olivier
Bruggink, Robin
Baan, Frank
Reukers, Hendrikus A. J.
Bronkhorst, Ewald M.
Kuijpers-Jagtman, Anne Marie
Ongkosuwito, Edwin M.
Operator Performance of the Digital Setup Fabrication for Orthodontic–Orthognathic Treatment: An Explorative Study
title Operator Performance of the Digital Setup Fabrication for Orthodontic–Orthognathic Treatment: An Explorative Study
title_full Operator Performance of the Digital Setup Fabrication for Orthodontic–Orthognathic Treatment: An Explorative Study
title_fullStr Operator Performance of the Digital Setup Fabrication for Orthodontic–Orthognathic Treatment: An Explorative Study
title_full_unstemmed Operator Performance of the Digital Setup Fabrication for Orthodontic–Orthognathic Treatment: An Explorative Study
title_short Operator Performance of the Digital Setup Fabrication for Orthodontic–Orthognathic Treatment: An Explorative Study
title_sort operator performance of the digital setup fabrication for orthodontic–orthognathic treatment: an explorative study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8745578/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35011886
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11010145
work_keys_str_mv AT dewaardolivier operatorperformanceofthedigitalsetupfabricationfororthodonticorthognathictreatmentanexplorativestudy
AT brugginkrobin operatorperformanceofthedigitalsetupfabricationfororthodonticorthognathictreatmentanexplorativestudy
AT baanfrank operatorperformanceofthedigitalsetupfabricationfororthodonticorthognathictreatmentanexplorativestudy
AT reukershendrikusaj operatorperformanceofthedigitalsetupfabricationfororthodonticorthognathictreatmentanexplorativestudy
AT bronkhorstewaldm operatorperformanceofthedigitalsetupfabricationfororthodonticorthognathictreatmentanexplorativestudy
AT kuijpersjagtmanannemarie operatorperformanceofthedigitalsetupfabricationfororthodonticorthognathictreatmentanexplorativestudy
AT ongkosuwitoedwinm operatorperformanceofthedigitalsetupfabricationfororthodonticorthognathictreatmentanexplorativestudy