Cargando…
Operator Performance of the Digital Setup Fabrication for Orthodontic–Orthognathic Treatment: An Explorative Study
The purpose of this study was to explore the operator performance of the fabrication of digital orthodontic setups integrated into cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans. Fifteen patients who underwent a combined orthodontic–orthognathic surgical treatment were included. The pre-treatment digita...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8745578/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35011886 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11010145 |
_version_ | 1784630379242586112 |
---|---|
author | de Waard, Olivier Bruggink, Robin Baan, Frank Reukers, Hendrikus A. J. Bronkhorst, Ewald M. Kuijpers-Jagtman, Anne Marie Ongkosuwito, Edwin M. |
author_facet | de Waard, Olivier Bruggink, Robin Baan, Frank Reukers, Hendrikus A. J. Bronkhorst, Ewald M. Kuijpers-Jagtman, Anne Marie Ongkosuwito, Edwin M. |
author_sort | de Waard, Olivier |
collection | PubMed |
description | The purpose of this study was to explore the operator performance of the fabrication of digital orthodontic setups integrated into cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans. Fifteen patients who underwent a combined orthodontic–orthognathic surgical treatment were included. The pre-treatment digital dental models and CBCT scans were fused, and four operators made virtual setups twice for all patients. Differences between the virtual setups were calculated by recording tooth crown movement from the pre-treatment model to the virtual setup. To examine performance, Pearson’s correlation coefficients, duplicate measurement errors, and inter-operator differences were calculated. For intra-operator performance, correlation values varied among tooth types, with mean correlation values from 0.66 to 0.83 for the maxilla and 0.70 to 0.83 for the mandible. For inter-operator performance, mean correlation values varied from 0.40 to 0.87 for the maxilla and from 0.44 to 0.80 for the mandible. Rotational mean differences exceeded the range of clinical acceptance (>2 degrees) at 18% for the maxilla and 20.8% for the mandible, and translational mean differences exceeded the range of clinical acceptance (0.6 mm) at 9.7% and 26% for the maxilla and mandible, respectively. The intra- and inter-operator performance of digital orthodontic setup construction for virtual three-dimensional orthognathic planning shows significant errors. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8745578 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87455782022-01-11 Operator Performance of the Digital Setup Fabrication for Orthodontic–Orthognathic Treatment: An Explorative Study de Waard, Olivier Bruggink, Robin Baan, Frank Reukers, Hendrikus A. J. Bronkhorst, Ewald M. Kuijpers-Jagtman, Anne Marie Ongkosuwito, Edwin M. J Clin Med Article The purpose of this study was to explore the operator performance of the fabrication of digital orthodontic setups integrated into cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans. Fifteen patients who underwent a combined orthodontic–orthognathic surgical treatment were included. The pre-treatment digital dental models and CBCT scans were fused, and four operators made virtual setups twice for all patients. Differences between the virtual setups were calculated by recording tooth crown movement from the pre-treatment model to the virtual setup. To examine performance, Pearson’s correlation coefficients, duplicate measurement errors, and inter-operator differences were calculated. For intra-operator performance, correlation values varied among tooth types, with mean correlation values from 0.66 to 0.83 for the maxilla and 0.70 to 0.83 for the mandible. For inter-operator performance, mean correlation values varied from 0.40 to 0.87 for the maxilla and from 0.44 to 0.80 for the mandible. Rotational mean differences exceeded the range of clinical acceptance (>2 degrees) at 18% for the maxilla and 20.8% for the mandible, and translational mean differences exceeded the range of clinical acceptance (0.6 mm) at 9.7% and 26% for the maxilla and mandible, respectively. The intra- and inter-operator performance of digital orthodontic setup construction for virtual three-dimensional orthognathic planning shows significant errors. MDPI 2021-12-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8745578/ /pubmed/35011886 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11010145 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article de Waard, Olivier Bruggink, Robin Baan, Frank Reukers, Hendrikus A. J. Bronkhorst, Ewald M. Kuijpers-Jagtman, Anne Marie Ongkosuwito, Edwin M. Operator Performance of the Digital Setup Fabrication for Orthodontic–Orthognathic Treatment: An Explorative Study |
title | Operator Performance of the Digital Setup Fabrication for Orthodontic–Orthognathic Treatment: An Explorative Study |
title_full | Operator Performance of the Digital Setup Fabrication for Orthodontic–Orthognathic Treatment: An Explorative Study |
title_fullStr | Operator Performance of the Digital Setup Fabrication for Orthodontic–Orthognathic Treatment: An Explorative Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Operator Performance of the Digital Setup Fabrication for Orthodontic–Orthognathic Treatment: An Explorative Study |
title_short | Operator Performance of the Digital Setup Fabrication for Orthodontic–Orthognathic Treatment: An Explorative Study |
title_sort | operator performance of the digital setup fabrication for orthodontic–orthognathic treatment: an explorative study |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8745578/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35011886 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11010145 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dewaardolivier operatorperformanceofthedigitalsetupfabricationfororthodonticorthognathictreatmentanexplorativestudy AT brugginkrobin operatorperformanceofthedigitalsetupfabricationfororthodonticorthognathictreatmentanexplorativestudy AT baanfrank operatorperformanceofthedigitalsetupfabricationfororthodonticorthognathictreatmentanexplorativestudy AT reukershendrikusaj operatorperformanceofthedigitalsetupfabricationfororthodonticorthognathictreatmentanexplorativestudy AT bronkhorstewaldm operatorperformanceofthedigitalsetupfabricationfororthodonticorthognathictreatmentanexplorativestudy AT kuijpersjagtmanannemarie operatorperformanceofthedigitalsetupfabricationfororthodonticorthognathictreatmentanexplorativestudy AT ongkosuwitoedwinm operatorperformanceofthedigitalsetupfabricationfororthodonticorthognathictreatmentanexplorativestudy |