Cargando…

Circular Economy of Construction and Demolition Waste: A Literature Review on Lessons, Challenges, and Benefits

Conventionally, in a linear economy, C&D (Construction and Demolition) waste was considered as zero value materials, and, as a result of that, most C&D waste materials ended up in landfills. In recent years, with the increase in the awareness around sustainability and resource management, va...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Purchase, Callun Keith, Al Zulayq, Dhafer Manna, O’Brien, Bio Talakatoa, Kowalewski, Matthew Joseph, Berenjian, Aydin, Tarighaleslami, Amir Hossein, Seifan, Mostafa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8745857/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35009222
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15010076
_version_ 1784630448084746240
author Purchase, Callun Keith
Al Zulayq, Dhafer Manna
O’Brien, Bio Talakatoa
Kowalewski, Matthew Joseph
Berenjian, Aydin
Tarighaleslami, Amir Hossein
Seifan, Mostafa
author_facet Purchase, Callun Keith
Al Zulayq, Dhafer Manna
O’Brien, Bio Talakatoa
Kowalewski, Matthew Joseph
Berenjian, Aydin
Tarighaleslami, Amir Hossein
Seifan, Mostafa
author_sort Purchase, Callun Keith
collection PubMed
description Conventionally, in a linear economy, C&D (Construction and Demolition) waste was considered as zero value materials, and, as a result of that, most C&D waste materials ended up in landfills. In recent years, with the increase in the awareness around sustainability and resource management, various countries have started to explore new models to minimize the use of limited resources which are currently overused, mismanaged, or quickly depleting. In this regard, the implementation of CE (Circular Economy) has emerged as a potential model to minimize the negative impact of C&D wastes on the environment. However, there are some challenges hindering a full transition to CE in the construction and demolition sectors. Therefore, this review paper aims to critically scrutinize different aspects of C&D waste and how CE can be integrated into construction projects. Reviewing of the literature revealed that the barriers in the implementation of CE in C&D waste sectors fall in five main domains, namely legal, technical, social, behavioral, and economic aspects. In this context, it was found that policy and governance, permits and specifications, technological limitation, quality and performance, knowledge and information, and, finally, the costs associated with the implementation of CE model at the early stage are the main barriers. In addition to these, from the contractors’ perspective, C&D waste dismantling, segregation, and on-site sorting, transportation, and local recovery processes are the main challenges at the start point for small-scale companies. To address the abovementioned challenges, and also to minimize the ambiguity of resulting outcomes by implementing CE in C&D waste sectors, there is an urgent need to introduce a global framework and a practicable pathway to allow companies to implement such models, regardless of their scale and location. Additionally, in this paper, recommendations on the direction for areas of future studies for a reduction in the environmental impacts have been provided. To structure an effective model approach, the future direction should be more focused on dismantling practices, hazardous material handling, quality control on waste acceptance, and material recovery processes, as well as a incentivization mechanism to promote ecological, economic, and social benefits of the CE for C&D sectors.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8745857
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87458572022-01-11 Circular Economy of Construction and Demolition Waste: A Literature Review on Lessons, Challenges, and Benefits Purchase, Callun Keith Al Zulayq, Dhafer Manna O’Brien, Bio Talakatoa Kowalewski, Matthew Joseph Berenjian, Aydin Tarighaleslami, Amir Hossein Seifan, Mostafa Materials (Basel) Review Conventionally, in a linear economy, C&D (Construction and Demolition) waste was considered as zero value materials, and, as a result of that, most C&D waste materials ended up in landfills. In recent years, with the increase in the awareness around sustainability and resource management, various countries have started to explore new models to minimize the use of limited resources which are currently overused, mismanaged, or quickly depleting. In this regard, the implementation of CE (Circular Economy) has emerged as a potential model to minimize the negative impact of C&D wastes on the environment. However, there are some challenges hindering a full transition to CE in the construction and demolition sectors. Therefore, this review paper aims to critically scrutinize different aspects of C&D waste and how CE can be integrated into construction projects. Reviewing of the literature revealed that the barriers in the implementation of CE in C&D waste sectors fall in five main domains, namely legal, technical, social, behavioral, and economic aspects. In this context, it was found that policy and governance, permits and specifications, technological limitation, quality and performance, knowledge and information, and, finally, the costs associated with the implementation of CE model at the early stage are the main barriers. In addition to these, from the contractors’ perspective, C&D waste dismantling, segregation, and on-site sorting, transportation, and local recovery processes are the main challenges at the start point for small-scale companies. To address the abovementioned challenges, and also to minimize the ambiguity of resulting outcomes by implementing CE in C&D waste sectors, there is an urgent need to introduce a global framework and a practicable pathway to allow companies to implement such models, regardless of their scale and location. Additionally, in this paper, recommendations on the direction for areas of future studies for a reduction in the environmental impacts have been provided. To structure an effective model approach, the future direction should be more focused on dismantling practices, hazardous material handling, quality control on waste acceptance, and material recovery processes, as well as a incentivization mechanism to promote ecological, economic, and social benefits of the CE for C&D sectors. MDPI 2021-12-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8745857/ /pubmed/35009222 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15010076 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Purchase, Callun Keith
Al Zulayq, Dhafer Manna
O’Brien, Bio Talakatoa
Kowalewski, Matthew Joseph
Berenjian, Aydin
Tarighaleslami, Amir Hossein
Seifan, Mostafa
Circular Economy of Construction and Demolition Waste: A Literature Review on Lessons, Challenges, and Benefits
title Circular Economy of Construction and Demolition Waste: A Literature Review on Lessons, Challenges, and Benefits
title_full Circular Economy of Construction and Demolition Waste: A Literature Review on Lessons, Challenges, and Benefits
title_fullStr Circular Economy of Construction and Demolition Waste: A Literature Review on Lessons, Challenges, and Benefits
title_full_unstemmed Circular Economy of Construction and Demolition Waste: A Literature Review on Lessons, Challenges, and Benefits
title_short Circular Economy of Construction and Demolition Waste: A Literature Review on Lessons, Challenges, and Benefits
title_sort circular economy of construction and demolition waste: a literature review on lessons, challenges, and benefits
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8745857/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35009222
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15010076
work_keys_str_mv AT purchasecallunkeith circulareconomyofconstructionanddemolitionwastealiteraturereviewonlessonschallengesandbenefits
AT alzulayqdhafermanna circulareconomyofconstructionanddemolitionwastealiteraturereviewonlessonschallengesandbenefits
AT obrienbiotalakatoa circulareconomyofconstructionanddemolitionwastealiteraturereviewonlessonschallengesandbenefits
AT kowalewskimatthewjoseph circulareconomyofconstructionanddemolitionwastealiteraturereviewonlessonschallengesandbenefits
AT berenjianaydin circulareconomyofconstructionanddemolitionwastealiteraturereviewonlessonschallengesandbenefits
AT tarighaleslamiamirhossein circulareconomyofconstructionanddemolitionwastealiteraturereviewonlessonschallengesandbenefits
AT seifanmostafa circulareconomyofconstructionanddemolitionwastealiteraturereviewonlessonschallengesandbenefits