Cargando…
Predicting the Ultimate Axial Capacity of Uniaxially Loaded CFST Columns Using Multiphysics Artificial Intelligence
The object of this research is concrete-filled steel tubes (CFST). The article aimed to develop a prediction Multiphysics model for the circular CFST column by using the Artificial Neural Network (ANN), the Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS) and the Gene Expression Program (GEP). The data...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8746085/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35009186 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15010039 |
_version_ | 1784630499826728960 |
---|---|
author | Khan, Sangeen Ali Khan, Mohsin Zafar, Adeel Javed, Muhammad Faisal Aslam, Fahid Musarat, Muhammad Ali Vatin, Nikolai Ivanovich |
author_facet | Khan, Sangeen Ali Khan, Mohsin Zafar, Adeel Javed, Muhammad Faisal Aslam, Fahid Musarat, Muhammad Ali Vatin, Nikolai Ivanovich |
author_sort | Khan, Sangeen |
collection | PubMed |
description | The object of this research is concrete-filled steel tubes (CFST). The article aimed to develop a prediction Multiphysics model for the circular CFST column by using the Artificial Neural Network (ANN), the Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS) and the Gene Expression Program (GEP). The database for this study contains 1667 datapoints in which 702 are short CFST columns and 965 are long CFST columns. The input parameters are the geometric dimensions of the structural elements of the column and the mechanical properties of materials. The target parameters are the bearing capacity of columns, which determines their life cycle. A Multiphysics model was developed, and various statistical checks were applied using the three artificial intelligence techniques mentioned above. Parametric and sensitivity analyses were also performed on both short and long GEP models. The overall performance of the GEP model was better than the ANN and ANFIS models, and the prediction values of the GEP model were near actual values. The PI of the predicted N(st) by GEP, ANN and ANFIS for training are 0.0416, 0.1423, and 0.1016, respectively, and for N(lg) these values are 0.1169, 0.2990 and 0.1542, respectively. Corresponding OF values are 0.2300, 0.1200, and 0.090 for N(st), and 0.1000, 0.2700, and 0.1500 for N(lg). The superiority of the GEP method to the other techniques can be seen from the fact that the GEP technique provides suitable connections based on practical experimental work and does not rely on prior solutions. It is concluded that the GEP model can be used to predict the bearing capacity of circular CFST columns to avoid any laborious and time-consuming experimental work. It is also recommended that further research should be performed on the data to develop a prediction equation using other techniques such as Random Forest Regression and Multi Expression Program. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8746085 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87460852022-01-11 Predicting the Ultimate Axial Capacity of Uniaxially Loaded CFST Columns Using Multiphysics Artificial Intelligence Khan, Sangeen Ali Khan, Mohsin Zafar, Adeel Javed, Muhammad Faisal Aslam, Fahid Musarat, Muhammad Ali Vatin, Nikolai Ivanovich Materials (Basel) Article The object of this research is concrete-filled steel tubes (CFST). The article aimed to develop a prediction Multiphysics model for the circular CFST column by using the Artificial Neural Network (ANN), the Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS) and the Gene Expression Program (GEP). The database for this study contains 1667 datapoints in which 702 are short CFST columns and 965 are long CFST columns. The input parameters are the geometric dimensions of the structural elements of the column and the mechanical properties of materials. The target parameters are the bearing capacity of columns, which determines their life cycle. A Multiphysics model was developed, and various statistical checks were applied using the three artificial intelligence techniques mentioned above. Parametric and sensitivity analyses were also performed on both short and long GEP models. The overall performance of the GEP model was better than the ANN and ANFIS models, and the prediction values of the GEP model were near actual values. The PI of the predicted N(st) by GEP, ANN and ANFIS for training are 0.0416, 0.1423, and 0.1016, respectively, and for N(lg) these values are 0.1169, 0.2990 and 0.1542, respectively. Corresponding OF values are 0.2300, 0.1200, and 0.090 for N(st), and 0.1000, 0.2700, and 0.1500 for N(lg). The superiority of the GEP method to the other techniques can be seen from the fact that the GEP technique provides suitable connections based on practical experimental work and does not rely on prior solutions. It is concluded that the GEP model can be used to predict the bearing capacity of circular CFST columns to avoid any laborious and time-consuming experimental work. It is also recommended that further research should be performed on the data to develop a prediction equation using other techniques such as Random Forest Regression and Multi Expression Program. MDPI 2021-12-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8746085/ /pubmed/35009186 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15010039 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Khan, Sangeen Ali Khan, Mohsin Zafar, Adeel Javed, Muhammad Faisal Aslam, Fahid Musarat, Muhammad Ali Vatin, Nikolai Ivanovich Predicting the Ultimate Axial Capacity of Uniaxially Loaded CFST Columns Using Multiphysics Artificial Intelligence |
title | Predicting the Ultimate Axial Capacity of Uniaxially Loaded CFST Columns Using Multiphysics Artificial Intelligence |
title_full | Predicting the Ultimate Axial Capacity of Uniaxially Loaded CFST Columns Using Multiphysics Artificial Intelligence |
title_fullStr | Predicting the Ultimate Axial Capacity of Uniaxially Loaded CFST Columns Using Multiphysics Artificial Intelligence |
title_full_unstemmed | Predicting the Ultimate Axial Capacity of Uniaxially Loaded CFST Columns Using Multiphysics Artificial Intelligence |
title_short | Predicting the Ultimate Axial Capacity of Uniaxially Loaded CFST Columns Using Multiphysics Artificial Intelligence |
title_sort | predicting the ultimate axial capacity of uniaxially loaded cfst columns using multiphysics artificial intelligence |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8746085/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35009186 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15010039 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT khansangeen predictingtheultimateaxialcapacityofuniaxiallyloadedcfstcolumnsusingmultiphysicsartificialintelligence AT alikhanmohsin predictingtheultimateaxialcapacityofuniaxiallyloadedcfstcolumnsusingmultiphysicsartificialintelligence AT zafaradeel predictingtheultimateaxialcapacityofuniaxiallyloadedcfstcolumnsusingmultiphysicsartificialintelligence AT javedmuhammadfaisal predictingtheultimateaxialcapacityofuniaxiallyloadedcfstcolumnsusingmultiphysicsartificialintelligence AT aslamfahid predictingtheultimateaxialcapacityofuniaxiallyloadedcfstcolumnsusingmultiphysicsartificialintelligence AT musaratmuhammadali predictingtheultimateaxialcapacityofuniaxiallyloadedcfstcolumnsusingmultiphysicsartificialintelligence AT vatinnikolaiivanovich predictingtheultimateaxialcapacityofuniaxiallyloadedcfstcolumnsusingmultiphysicsartificialintelligence |