Cargando…

A Comparative Analysis of Selected Methods for Determining Young’s Modulus in Polylactic Acid Samples Manufactured with the FDM Method

The objective of this study was to compare three methods for determining the Young’s modulus of polylactic acid (PLA) and acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene (ABS) samples. The samples were manufactured viathe fused filament fabrication/fused deposition modeling (FFF/FDM) 3D printing technique. Samples...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pszczółkowski, Bartosz, Nowak, Konrad W., Rejmer, Wojciech, Bramowicz, Mirosław, Dzadz, Łukasz, Gałęcki, Remigiusz
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8746243/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35009295
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15010149
_version_ 1784630537893183488
author Pszczółkowski, Bartosz
Nowak, Konrad W.
Rejmer, Wojciech
Bramowicz, Mirosław
Dzadz, Łukasz
Gałęcki, Remigiusz
author_facet Pszczółkowski, Bartosz
Nowak, Konrad W.
Rejmer, Wojciech
Bramowicz, Mirosław
Dzadz, Łukasz
Gałęcki, Remigiusz
author_sort Pszczółkowski, Bartosz
collection PubMed
description The objective of this study was to compare three methods for determining the Young’s modulus of polylactic acid (PLA) and acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene (ABS) samples. The samples were manufactured viathe fused filament fabrication/fused deposition modeling (FFF/FDM) 3D printing technique. Samples for analysis were obtained at processing temperatures of 180 °C to 230 °C. Measurements were performed with the use of two nondestructive techniques: the impulse excitation technique (IET) and the ultrasonic (US) method. The results were compared with values obtained in static tensile tests (STT), which ranged from 2.06 ± 0.03 to 2.15 ± 0.05 GPa. Similar changes in Young’s modulus were observed in response to the processing temperatures of the compared methods. The values generated by the US method were closer to the results of the STT, but still diverged considerably, and the error exceeded 10% in all cases. Based on the present findings, it might be concluded that the results of destructive and nondestructive tests differ by approximately 1 GPa.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8746243
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87462432022-01-11 A Comparative Analysis of Selected Methods for Determining Young’s Modulus in Polylactic Acid Samples Manufactured with the FDM Method Pszczółkowski, Bartosz Nowak, Konrad W. Rejmer, Wojciech Bramowicz, Mirosław Dzadz, Łukasz Gałęcki, Remigiusz Materials (Basel) Article The objective of this study was to compare three methods for determining the Young’s modulus of polylactic acid (PLA) and acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene (ABS) samples. The samples were manufactured viathe fused filament fabrication/fused deposition modeling (FFF/FDM) 3D printing technique. Samples for analysis were obtained at processing temperatures of 180 °C to 230 °C. Measurements were performed with the use of two nondestructive techniques: the impulse excitation technique (IET) and the ultrasonic (US) method. The results were compared with values obtained in static tensile tests (STT), which ranged from 2.06 ± 0.03 to 2.15 ± 0.05 GPa. Similar changes in Young’s modulus were observed in response to the processing temperatures of the compared methods. The values generated by the US method were closer to the results of the STT, but still diverged considerably, and the error exceeded 10% in all cases. Based on the present findings, it might be concluded that the results of destructive and nondestructive tests differ by approximately 1 GPa. MDPI 2021-12-25 /pmc/articles/PMC8746243/ /pubmed/35009295 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15010149 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Pszczółkowski, Bartosz
Nowak, Konrad W.
Rejmer, Wojciech
Bramowicz, Mirosław
Dzadz, Łukasz
Gałęcki, Remigiusz
A Comparative Analysis of Selected Methods for Determining Young’s Modulus in Polylactic Acid Samples Manufactured with the FDM Method
title A Comparative Analysis of Selected Methods for Determining Young’s Modulus in Polylactic Acid Samples Manufactured with the FDM Method
title_full A Comparative Analysis of Selected Methods for Determining Young’s Modulus in Polylactic Acid Samples Manufactured with the FDM Method
title_fullStr A Comparative Analysis of Selected Methods for Determining Young’s Modulus in Polylactic Acid Samples Manufactured with the FDM Method
title_full_unstemmed A Comparative Analysis of Selected Methods for Determining Young’s Modulus in Polylactic Acid Samples Manufactured with the FDM Method
title_short A Comparative Analysis of Selected Methods for Determining Young’s Modulus in Polylactic Acid Samples Manufactured with the FDM Method
title_sort comparative analysis of selected methods for determining young’s modulus in polylactic acid samples manufactured with the fdm method
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8746243/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35009295
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15010149
work_keys_str_mv AT pszczołkowskibartosz acomparativeanalysisofselectedmethodsfordeterminingyoungsmodulusinpolylacticacidsamplesmanufacturedwiththefdmmethod
AT nowakkonradw acomparativeanalysisofselectedmethodsfordeterminingyoungsmodulusinpolylacticacidsamplesmanufacturedwiththefdmmethod
AT rejmerwojciech acomparativeanalysisofselectedmethodsfordeterminingyoungsmodulusinpolylacticacidsamplesmanufacturedwiththefdmmethod
AT bramowiczmirosław acomparativeanalysisofselectedmethodsfordeterminingyoungsmodulusinpolylacticacidsamplesmanufacturedwiththefdmmethod
AT dzadzłukasz acomparativeanalysisofselectedmethodsfordeterminingyoungsmodulusinpolylacticacidsamplesmanufacturedwiththefdmmethod
AT gałeckiremigiusz acomparativeanalysisofselectedmethodsfordeterminingyoungsmodulusinpolylacticacidsamplesmanufacturedwiththefdmmethod
AT pszczołkowskibartosz comparativeanalysisofselectedmethodsfordeterminingyoungsmodulusinpolylacticacidsamplesmanufacturedwiththefdmmethod
AT nowakkonradw comparativeanalysisofselectedmethodsfordeterminingyoungsmodulusinpolylacticacidsamplesmanufacturedwiththefdmmethod
AT rejmerwojciech comparativeanalysisofselectedmethodsfordeterminingyoungsmodulusinpolylacticacidsamplesmanufacturedwiththefdmmethod
AT bramowiczmirosław comparativeanalysisofselectedmethodsfordeterminingyoungsmodulusinpolylacticacidsamplesmanufacturedwiththefdmmethod
AT dzadzłukasz comparativeanalysisofselectedmethodsfordeterminingyoungsmodulusinpolylacticacidsamplesmanufacturedwiththefdmmethod
AT gałeckiremigiusz comparativeanalysisofselectedmethodsfordeterminingyoungsmodulusinpolylacticacidsamplesmanufacturedwiththefdmmethod