Cargando…
A Comparative Analysis of Selected Methods for Determining Young’s Modulus in Polylactic Acid Samples Manufactured with the FDM Method
The objective of this study was to compare three methods for determining the Young’s modulus of polylactic acid (PLA) and acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene (ABS) samples. The samples were manufactured viathe fused filament fabrication/fused deposition modeling (FFF/FDM) 3D printing technique. Samples...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8746243/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35009295 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15010149 |
_version_ | 1784630537893183488 |
---|---|
author | Pszczółkowski, Bartosz Nowak, Konrad W. Rejmer, Wojciech Bramowicz, Mirosław Dzadz, Łukasz Gałęcki, Remigiusz |
author_facet | Pszczółkowski, Bartosz Nowak, Konrad W. Rejmer, Wojciech Bramowicz, Mirosław Dzadz, Łukasz Gałęcki, Remigiusz |
author_sort | Pszczółkowski, Bartosz |
collection | PubMed |
description | The objective of this study was to compare three methods for determining the Young’s modulus of polylactic acid (PLA) and acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene (ABS) samples. The samples were manufactured viathe fused filament fabrication/fused deposition modeling (FFF/FDM) 3D printing technique. Samples for analysis were obtained at processing temperatures of 180 °C to 230 °C. Measurements were performed with the use of two nondestructive techniques: the impulse excitation technique (IET) and the ultrasonic (US) method. The results were compared with values obtained in static tensile tests (STT), which ranged from 2.06 ± 0.03 to 2.15 ± 0.05 GPa. Similar changes in Young’s modulus were observed in response to the processing temperatures of the compared methods. The values generated by the US method were closer to the results of the STT, but still diverged considerably, and the error exceeded 10% in all cases. Based on the present findings, it might be concluded that the results of destructive and nondestructive tests differ by approximately 1 GPa. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8746243 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87462432022-01-11 A Comparative Analysis of Selected Methods for Determining Young’s Modulus in Polylactic Acid Samples Manufactured with the FDM Method Pszczółkowski, Bartosz Nowak, Konrad W. Rejmer, Wojciech Bramowicz, Mirosław Dzadz, Łukasz Gałęcki, Remigiusz Materials (Basel) Article The objective of this study was to compare three methods for determining the Young’s modulus of polylactic acid (PLA) and acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene (ABS) samples. The samples were manufactured viathe fused filament fabrication/fused deposition modeling (FFF/FDM) 3D printing technique. Samples for analysis were obtained at processing temperatures of 180 °C to 230 °C. Measurements were performed with the use of two nondestructive techniques: the impulse excitation technique (IET) and the ultrasonic (US) method. The results were compared with values obtained in static tensile tests (STT), which ranged from 2.06 ± 0.03 to 2.15 ± 0.05 GPa. Similar changes in Young’s modulus were observed in response to the processing temperatures of the compared methods. The values generated by the US method were closer to the results of the STT, but still diverged considerably, and the error exceeded 10% in all cases. Based on the present findings, it might be concluded that the results of destructive and nondestructive tests differ by approximately 1 GPa. MDPI 2021-12-25 /pmc/articles/PMC8746243/ /pubmed/35009295 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15010149 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Pszczółkowski, Bartosz Nowak, Konrad W. Rejmer, Wojciech Bramowicz, Mirosław Dzadz, Łukasz Gałęcki, Remigiusz A Comparative Analysis of Selected Methods for Determining Young’s Modulus in Polylactic Acid Samples Manufactured with the FDM Method |
title | A Comparative Analysis of Selected Methods for Determining Young’s Modulus in Polylactic Acid Samples Manufactured with the FDM Method |
title_full | A Comparative Analysis of Selected Methods for Determining Young’s Modulus in Polylactic Acid Samples Manufactured with the FDM Method |
title_fullStr | A Comparative Analysis of Selected Methods for Determining Young’s Modulus in Polylactic Acid Samples Manufactured with the FDM Method |
title_full_unstemmed | A Comparative Analysis of Selected Methods for Determining Young’s Modulus in Polylactic Acid Samples Manufactured with the FDM Method |
title_short | A Comparative Analysis of Selected Methods for Determining Young’s Modulus in Polylactic Acid Samples Manufactured with the FDM Method |
title_sort | comparative analysis of selected methods for determining young’s modulus in polylactic acid samples manufactured with the fdm method |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8746243/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35009295 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15010149 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pszczołkowskibartosz acomparativeanalysisofselectedmethodsfordeterminingyoungsmodulusinpolylacticacidsamplesmanufacturedwiththefdmmethod AT nowakkonradw acomparativeanalysisofselectedmethodsfordeterminingyoungsmodulusinpolylacticacidsamplesmanufacturedwiththefdmmethod AT rejmerwojciech acomparativeanalysisofselectedmethodsfordeterminingyoungsmodulusinpolylacticacidsamplesmanufacturedwiththefdmmethod AT bramowiczmirosław acomparativeanalysisofselectedmethodsfordeterminingyoungsmodulusinpolylacticacidsamplesmanufacturedwiththefdmmethod AT dzadzłukasz acomparativeanalysisofselectedmethodsfordeterminingyoungsmodulusinpolylacticacidsamplesmanufacturedwiththefdmmethod AT gałeckiremigiusz acomparativeanalysisofselectedmethodsfordeterminingyoungsmodulusinpolylacticacidsamplesmanufacturedwiththefdmmethod AT pszczołkowskibartosz comparativeanalysisofselectedmethodsfordeterminingyoungsmodulusinpolylacticacidsamplesmanufacturedwiththefdmmethod AT nowakkonradw comparativeanalysisofselectedmethodsfordeterminingyoungsmodulusinpolylacticacidsamplesmanufacturedwiththefdmmethod AT rejmerwojciech comparativeanalysisofselectedmethodsfordeterminingyoungsmodulusinpolylacticacidsamplesmanufacturedwiththefdmmethod AT bramowiczmirosław comparativeanalysisofselectedmethodsfordeterminingyoungsmodulusinpolylacticacidsamplesmanufacturedwiththefdmmethod AT dzadzłukasz comparativeanalysisofselectedmethodsfordeterminingyoungsmodulusinpolylacticacidsamplesmanufacturedwiththefdmmethod AT gałeckiremigiusz comparativeanalysisofselectedmethodsfordeterminingyoungsmodulusinpolylacticacidsamplesmanufacturedwiththefdmmethod |