Cargando…

Phytic Acid and Whole Grains for Health Controversy

Phytate (PA) serves as a phosphate storage molecule in cereals and other plant foods. In food and in the human body, PA has a high affinity to chelate Zn(2+) and Fe(2+), Mg(2+), Ca(2+), K(+), Mn(2+) and Cu(2+). As a consequence, minerals chelated in PA are not bio-available, which is a concern for p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Brouns, Fred
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8746346/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35010899
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu14010025
_version_ 1784630563262431232
author Brouns, Fred
author_facet Brouns, Fred
author_sort Brouns, Fred
collection PubMed
description Phytate (PA) serves as a phosphate storage molecule in cereals and other plant foods. In food and in the human body, PA has a high affinity to chelate Zn(2+) and Fe(2+), Mg(2+), Ca(2+), K(+), Mn(2+) and Cu(2+). As a consequence, minerals chelated in PA are not bio-available, which is a concern for public health in conditions of poor food availability and low mineral intakes, ultimately leading to an impaired micronutrient status, growth, development and increased mortality. For low-income countries this has resulted in communications on how to reduce the content of PA in food, by appropriate at home food processing. However, claims that a reduction in PA in food by processing per definition leads to a measurable improvement in mineral status and that the consumption of grains rich in PA impairs mineral status requires nuance. Frequently observed decreases of PA and increases in soluble minerals in in vitro food digestion (increased bio-accessibility) are used to promote food benefits. However, these do not necessarily translate into an increased bioavailability and mineral status in vivo. In vitro essays have limitations, such as the absence of blood flow, hormonal responses, neural regulation, gut epithelium associated factors and the presence of microbiota, which mutually influence the in vivo effects and should be considered. In Western countries, increased consumption of whole grain foods is associated with improved health outcomes, which does not justify advice to refrain from grain-based foods because they contain PA. The present commentary aims to clarify these seemingly controversial aspects.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8746346
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87463462022-01-11 Phytic Acid and Whole Grains for Health Controversy Brouns, Fred Nutrients Communication Phytate (PA) serves as a phosphate storage molecule in cereals and other plant foods. In food and in the human body, PA has a high affinity to chelate Zn(2+) and Fe(2+), Mg(2+), Ca(2+), K(+), Mn(2+) and Cu(2+). As a consequence, minerals chelated in PA are not bio-available, which is a concern for public health in conditions of poor food availability and low mineral intakes, ultimately leading to an impaired micronutrient status, growth, development and increased mortality. For low-income countries this has resulted in communications on how to reduce the content of PA in food, by appropriate at home food processing. However, claims that a reduction in PA in food by processing per definition leads to a measurable improvement in mineral status and that the consumption of grains rich in PA impairs mineral status requires nuance. Frequently observed decreases of PA and increases in soluble minerals in in vitro food digestion (increased bio-accessibility) are used to promote food benefits. However, these do not necessarily translate into an increased bioavailability and mineral status in vivo. In vitro essays have limitations, such as the absence of blood flow, hormonal responses, neural regulation, gut epithelium associated factors and the presence of microbiota, which mutually influence the in vivo effects and should be considered. In Western countries, increased consumption of whole grain foods is associated with improved health outcomes, which does not justify advice to refrain from grain-based foods because they contain PA. The present commentary aims to clarify these seemingly controversial aspects. MDPI 2021-12-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8746346/ /pubmed/35010899 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu14010025 Text en © 2021 by the author. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Communication
Brouns, Fred
Phytic Acid and Whole Grains for Health Controversy
title Phytic Acid and Whole Grains for Health Controversy
title_full Phytic Acid and Whole Grains for Health Controversy
title_fullStr Phytic Acid and Whole Grains for Health Controversy
title_full_unstemmed Phytic Acid and Whole Grains for Health Controversy
title_short Phytic Acid and Whole Grains for Health Controversy
title_sort phytic acid and whole grains for health controversy
topic Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8746346/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35010899
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu14010025
work_keys_str_mv AT brounsfred phyticacidandwholegrainsforhealthcontroversy