Cargando…
Gut Microbiome Composition in Obese and Non-Obese Persons: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Whether the gut microbiome in obesity is characterized by lower diversity and altered composition at the phylum or genus level may be more accurately investigated using high-throughput sequencing technologies. We conducted a systematic review in PubMed and Embase including 32 cross-sectional studies...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8746372/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35010887 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu14010012 |
_version_ | 1784630569666084864 |
---|---|
author | Pinart, Mariona Dötsch, Andreas Schlicht, Kristina Laudes, Matthias Bouwman, Jildau Forslund, Sofia K. Pischon, Tobias Nimptsch, Katharina |
author_facet | Pinart, Mariona Dötsch, Andreas Schlicht, Kristina Laudes, Matthias Bouwman, Jildau Forslund, Sofia K. Pischon, Tobias Nimptsch, Katharina |
author_sort | Pinart, Mariona |
collection | PubMed |
description | Whether the gut microbiome in obesity is characterized by lower diversity and altered composition at the phylum or genus level may be more accurately investigated using high-throughput sequencing technologies. We conducted a systematic review in PubMed and Embase including 32 cross-sectional studies assessing the gut microbiome composition by high-throughput sequencing in obese and non-obese adults. A significantly lower alpha diversity (Shannon index) in obese versus non-obese adults was observed in nine out of 22 studies, and meta-analysis of seven studies revealed a non-significant mean difference (−0.06, 95% CI −0.24, 0.12, I(2) = 81%). At the phylum level, significantly more Firmicutes and fewer Bacteroidetes in obese versus non-obese adults were observed in six out of seventeen, and in four out of eighteen studies, respectively. Meta-analyses of six studies revealed significantly higher Firmicutes (5.50, 95% 0.27, 10.73, I(2) = 81%) and non-significantly lower Bacteroidetes (−4.79, 95% CI −10.77, 1.20, I(2) = 86%). At the genus level, lower relative proportions of Bifidobacterium and Eggerthella and higher Acidaminococcus, Anaerococcus, Catenibacterium, Dialister, Dorea, Escherichia-Shigella, Eubacterium, Fusobacterium, Megasphera, Prevotella, Roseburia, Streptococcus, and Sutterella were found in obese versus non-obese adults. Although a proportion of studies found lower diversity and differences in gut microbiome composition in obese versus non-obese adults, the observed heterogeneity across studies precludes clear answers. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8746372 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87463722022-01-11 Gut Microbiome Composition in Obese and Non-Obese Persons: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Pinart, Mariona Dötsch, Andreas Schlicht, Kristina Laudes, Matthias Bouwman, Jildau Forslund, Sofia K. Pischon, Tobias Nimptsch, Katharina Nutrients Review Whether the gut microbiome in obesity is characterized by lower diversity and altered composition at the phylum or genus level may be more accurately investigated using high-throughput sequencing technologies. We conducted a systematic review in PubMed and Embase including 32 cross-sectional studies assessing the gut microbiome composition by high-throughput sequencing in obese and non-obese adults. A significantly lower alpha diversity (Shannon index) in obese versus non-obese adults was observed in nine out of 22 studies, and meta-analysis of seven studies revealed a non-significant mean difference (−0.06, 95% CI −0.24, 0.12, I(2) = 81%). At the phylum level, significantly more Firmicutes and fewer Bacteroidetes in obese versus non-obese adults were observed in six out of seventeen, and in four out of eighteen studies, respectively. Meta-analyses of six studies revealed significantly higher Firmicutes (5.50, 95% 0.27, 10.73, I(2) = 81%) and non-significantly lower Bacteroidetes (−4.79, 95% CI −10.77, 1.20, I(2) = 86%). At the genus level, lower relative proportions of Bifidobacterium and Eggerthella and higher Acidaminococcus, Anaerococcus, Catenibacterium, Dialister, Dorea, Escherichia-Shigella, Eubacterium, Fusobacterium, Megasphera, Prevotella, Roseburia, Streptococcus, and Sutterella were found in obese versus non-obese adults. Although a proportion of studies found lower diversity and differences in gut microbiome composition in obese versus non-obese adults, the observed heterogeneity across studies precludes clear answers. MDPI 2021-12-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8746372/ /pubmed/35010887 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu14010012 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Pinart, Mariona Dötsch, Andreas Schlicht, Kristina Laudes, Matthias Bouwman, Jildau Forslund, Sofia K. Pischon, Tobias Nimptsch, Katharina Gut Microbiome Composition in Obese and Non-Obese Persons: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title | Gut Microbiome Composition in Obese and Non-Obese Persons: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full | Gut Microbiome Composition in Obese and Non-Obese Persons: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr | Gut Microbiome Composition in Obese and Non-Obese Persons: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Gut Microbiome Composition in Obese and Non-Obese Persons: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_short | Gut Microbiome Composition in Obese and Non-Obese Persons: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_sort | gut microbiome composition in obese and non-obese persons: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8746372/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35010887 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu14010012 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pinartmariona gutmicrobiomecompositioninobeseandnonobesepersonsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT dotschandreas gutmicrobiomecompositioninobeseandnonobesepersonsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT schlichtkristina gutmicrobiomecompositioninobeseandnonobesepersonsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT laudesmatthias gutmicrobiomecompositioninobeseandnonobesepersonsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT bouwmanjildau gutmicrobiomecompositioninobeseandnonobesepersonsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT forslundsofiak gutmicrobiomecompositioninobeseandnonobesepersonsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT pischontobias gutmicrobiomecompositioninobeseandnonobesepersonsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT nimptschkatharina gutmicrobiomecompositioninobeseandnonobesepersonsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |