Cargando…

Reassessment of Annamocarya sinesis (Carya sinensis) Taxonomy through Concatenation and Coalescence Phylogenetic Analysis

Due to its peculiar morphological characteristics, there is dispute as to whether the genus of Annamocarya sinensis, a species of Juglandaceae, is Annamocarya or Carya. Most morphologists believe it should be distinguished from the Carya genus while genomicists suggest that A. sinensis belongs to th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Luo, Jie, Chen, Junhao, Guo, Wenlei, Yang, Zhengfu, Lim, Kean-Jin, Wang, Zhengjia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8747223/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35009055
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants11010052
_version_ 1784630781342121984
author Luo, Jie
Chen, Junhao
Guo, Wenlei
Yang, Zhengfu
Lim, Kean-Jin
Wang, Zhengjia
author_facet Luo, Jie
Chen, Junhao
Guo, Wenlei
Yang, Zhengfu
Lim, Kean-Jin
Wang, Zhengjia
author_sort Luo, Jie
collection PubMed
description Due to its peculiar morphological characteristics, there is dispute as to whether the genus of Annamocarya sinensis, a species of Juglandaceae, is Annamocarya or Carya. Most morphologists believe it should be distinguished from the Carya genus while genomicists suggest that A. sinensis belongs to the Carya genus. To explore the taxonomic status of A. sinensis using chloroplast genes, we collected chloroplast genomes of 16 plant species and assembled chloroplast genomes of 10 unpublished Carya species. We analyzed all 26 species’ chloroplast genomes through two analytical approaches (concatenation and coalescence), using the entire and unique chloroplast coding sequence (CDS) and entire and protein sequences. Our results indicate that the analysis of the CDS and protein sequences or unique CDS and unique protein sequence of chloroplast genomes shows that A. sinensis indeed belongs to the Carya genus. In addition, our analysis shows that, compared to single chloroplast genes, the phylogeny trees constructed using numerous genes showed higher consistency. Moreover, the phylogenetic analysis calculated with the coalescence method and unique gene sequences was more robust than that done with the concatenation method, particularly for analyzing phylogenetically controversial species. Through the analysis, our results concluded that A. sinensis should be called C. sinensis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8747223
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87472232022-01-11 Reassessment of Annamocarya sinesis (Carya sinensis) Taxonomy through Concatenation and Coalescence Phylogenetic Analysis Luo, Jie Chen, Junhao Guo, Wenlei Yang, Zhengfu Lim, Kean-Jin Wang, Zhengjia Plants (Basel) Article Due to its peculiar morphological characteristics, there is dispute as to whether the genus of Annamocarya sinensis, a species of Juglandaceae, is Annamocarya or Carya. Most morphologists believe it should be distinguished from the Carya genus while genomicists suggest that A. sinensis belongs to the Carya genus. To explore the taxonomic status of A. sinensis using chloroplast genes, we collected chloroplast genomes of 16 plant species and assembled chloroplast genomes of 10 unpublished Carya species. We analyzed all 26 species’ chloroplast genomes through two analytical approaches (concatenation and coalescence), using the entire and unique chloroplast coding sequence (CDS) and entire and protein sequences. Our results indicate that the analysis of the CDS and protein sequences or unique CDS and unique protein sequence of chloroplast genomes shows that A. sinensis indeed belongs to the Carya genus. In addition, our analysis shows that, compared to single chloroplast genes, the phylogeny trees constructed using numerous genes showed higher consistency. Moreover, the phylogenetic analysis calculated with the coalescence method and unique gene sequences was more robust than that done with the concatenation method, particularly for analyzing phylogenetically controversial species. Through the analysis, our results concluded that A. sinensis should be called C. sinensis. MDPI 2021-12-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8747223/ /pubmed/35009055 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants11010052 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Luo, Jie
Chen, Junhao
Guo, Wenlei
Yang, Zhengfu
Lim, Kean-Jin
Wang, Zhengjia
Reassessment of Annamocarya sinesis (Carya sinensis) Taxonomy through Concatenation and Coalescence Phylogenetic Analysis
title Reassessment of Annamocarya sinesis (Carya sinensis) Taxonomy through Concatenation and Coalescence Phylogenetic Analysis
title_full Reassessment of Annamocarya sinesis (Carya sinensis) Taxonomy through Concatenation and Coalescence Phylogenetic Analysis
title_fullStr Reassessment of Annamocarya sinesis (Carya sinensis) Taxonomy through Concatenation and Coalescence Phylogenetic Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Reassessment of Annamocarya sinesis (Carya sinensis) Taxonomy through Concatenation and Coalescence Phylogenetic Analysis
title_short Reassessment of Annamocarya sinesis (Carya sinensis) Taxonomy through Concatenation and Coalescence Phylogenetic Analysis
title_sort reassessment of annamocarya sinesis (carya sinensis) taxonomy through concatenation and coalescence phylogenetic analysis
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8747223/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35009055
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants11010052
work_keys_str_mv AT luojie reassessmentofannamocaryasinesiscaryasinensistaxonomythroughconcatenationandcoalescencephylogeneticanalysis
AT chenjunhao reassessmentofannamocaryasinesiscaryasinensistaxonomythroughconcatenationandcoalescencephylogeneticanalysis
AT guowenlei reassessmentofannamocaryasinesiscaryasinensistaxonomythroughconcatenationandcoalescencephylogeneticanalysis
AT yangzhengfu reassessmentofannamocaryasinesiscaryasinensistaxonomythroughconcatenationandcoalescencephylogeneticanalysis
AT limkeanjin reassessmentofannamocaryasinesiscaryasinensistaxonomythroughconcatenationandcoalescencephylogeneticanalysis
AT wangzhengjia reassessmentofannamocaryasinesiscaryasinensistaxonomythroughconcatenationandcoalescencephylogeneticanalysis