Cargando…

Reward learning and statistical learning independently influence attentional priority of salient distractors in visual search

Existing research demonstrates different ways in which attentional prioritization of salient nontarget stimuli is shaped by prior experience: Reward learning renders signals of high-value outcomes more likely to capture attention than signals of low-value outcomes, whereas statistical learning can p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Le Pelley, Mike E., Ung, Rhonda, Mine, Chisato, Most, Steven B., Watson, Poppy, Pearson, Daniel, Theeuwes, Jan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8747445/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35013993
http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13414-021-02426-7
_version_ 1784630838377316352
author Le Pelley, Mike E.
Ung, Rhonda
Mine, Chisato
Most, Steven B.
Watson, Poppy
Pearson, Daniel
Theeuwes, Jan
author_facet Le Pelley, Mike E.
Ung, Rhonda
Mine, Chisato
Most, Steven B.
Watson, Poppy
Pearson, Daniel
Theeuwes, Jan
author_sort Le Pelley, Mike E.
collection PubMed
description Existing research demonstrates different ways in which attentional prioritization of salient nontarget stimuli is shaped by prior experience: Reward learning renders signals of high-value outcomes more likely to capture attention than signals of low-value outcomes, whereas statistical learning can produce attentional suppression of the location in which salient distractor items are likely to appear. The current study combined manipulations of the value and location associated with salient distractors in visual search to investigate whether these different effects of selection history operate independently or interact to determine overall attentional prioritization of salient distractors. In Experiment 1, high-value and low-value distractors most frequently appeared in the same location; in Experiment 2, high-value and low-value distractors typically appeared in distinct locations. In both experiments, effects of distractor value and location were additive, suggesting that attention-promoting effects of value and attention-suppressing effects of statistical location-learning independently modulate overall attentional priority. Our findings are consistent with a view that sees attention as mediated by a common priority map that receives and integrates separate signals relating to physical salience and value, with signal suppression based on statistical learning determined by physical salience, but not incentive salience. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.3758/s13414-021-02426-7.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8747445
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87474452022-01-11 Reward learning and statistical learning independently influence attentional priority of salient distractors in visual search Le Pelley, Mike E. Ung, Rhonda Mine, Chisato Most, Steven B. Watson, Poppy Pearson, Daniel Theeuwes, Jan Atten Percept Psychophys Article Existing research demonstrates different ways in which attentional prioritization of salient nontarget stimuli is shaped by prior experience: Reward learning renders signals of high-value outcomes more likely to capture attention than signals of low-value outcomes, whereas statistical learning can produce attentional suppression of the location in which salient distractor items are likely to appear. The current study combined manipulations of the value and location associated with salient distractors in visual search to investigate whether these different effects of selection history operate independently or interact to determine overall attentional prioritization of salient distractors. In Experiment 1, high-value and low-value distractors most frequently appeared in the same location; in Experiment 2, high-value and low-value distractors typically appeared in distinct locations. In both experiments, effects of distractor value and location were additive, suggesting that attention-promoting effects of value and attention-suppressing effects of statistical location-learning independently modulate overall attentional priority. Our findings are consistent with a view that sees attention as mediated by a common priority map that receives and integrates separate signals relating to physical salience and value, with signal suppression based on statistical learning determined by physical salience, but not incentive salience. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.3758/s13414-021-02426-7. Springer US 2022-01-10 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8747445/ /pubmed/35013993 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13414-021-02426-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Le Pelley, Mike E.
Ung, Rhonda
Mine, Chisato
Most, Steven B.
Watson, Poppy
Pearson, Daniel
Theeuwes, Jan
Reward learning and statistical learning independently influence attentional priority of salient distractors in visual search
title Reward learning and statistical learning independently influence attentional priority of salient distractors in visual search
title_full Reward learning and statistical learning independently influence attentional priority of salient distractors in visual search
title_fullStr Reward learning and statistical learning independently influence attentional priority of salient distractors in visual search
title_full_unstemmed Reward learning and statistical learning independently influence attentional priority of salient distractors in visual search
title_short Reward learning and statistical learning independently influence attentional priority of salient distractors in visual search
title_sort reward learning and statistical learning independently influence attentional priority of salient distractors in visual search
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8747445/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35013993
http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13414-021-02426-7
work_keys_str_mv AT lepelleymikee rewardlearningandstatisticallearningindependentlyinfluenceattentionalpriorityofsalientdistractorsinvisualsearch
AT ungrhonda rewardlearningandstatisticallearningindependentlyinfluenceattentionalpriorityofsalientdistractorsinvisualsearch
AT minechisato rewardlearningandstatisticallearningindependentlyinfluenceattentionalpriorityofsalientdistractorsinvisualsearch
AT moststevenb rewardlearningandstatisticallearningindependentlyinfluenceattentionalpriorityofsalientdistractorsinvisualsearch
AT watsonpoppy rewardlearningandstatisticallearningindependentlyinfluenceattentionalpriorityofsalientdistractorsinvisualsearch
AT pearsondaniel rewardlearningandstatisticallearningindependentlyinfluenceattentionalpriorityofsalientdistractorsinvisualsearch
AT theeuwesjan rewardlearningandstatisticallearningindependentlyinfluenceattentionalpriorityofsalientdistractorsinvisualsearch