Cargando…
Reward learning and statistical learning independently influence attentional priority of salient distractors in visual search
Existing research demonstrates different ways in which attentional prioritization of salient nontarget stimuli is shaped by prior experience: Reward learning renders signals of high-value outcomes more likely to capture attention than signals of low-value outcomes, whereas statistical learning can p...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8747445/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35013993 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13414-021-02426-7 |
_version_ | 1784630838377316352 |
---|---|
author | Le Pelley, Mike E. Ung, Rhonda Mine, Chisato Most, Steven B. Watson, Poppy Pearson, Daniel Theeuwes, Jan |
author_facet | Le Pelley, Mike E. Ung, Rhonda Mine, Chisato Most, Steven B. Watson, Poppy Pearson, Daniel Theeuwes, Jan |
author_sort | Le Pelley, Mike E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Existing research demonstrates different ways in which attentional prioritization of salient nontarget stimuli is shaped by prior experience: Reward learning renders signals of high-value outcomes more likely to capture attention than signals of low-value outcomes, whereas statistical learning can produce attentional suppression of the location in which salient distractor items are likely to appear. The current study combined manipulations of the value and location associated with salient distractors in visual search to investigate whether these different effects of selection history operate independently or interact to determine overall attentional prioritization of salient distractors. In Experiment 1, high-value and low-value distractors most frequently appeared in the same location; in Experiment 2, high-value and low-value distractors typically appeared in distinct locations. In both experiments, effects of distractor value and location were additive, suggesting that attention-promoting effects of value and attention-suppressing effects of statistical location-learning independently modulate overall attentional priority. Our findings are consistent with a view that sees attention as mediated by a common priority map that receives and integrates separate signals relating to physical salience and value, with signal suppression based on statistical learning determined by physical salience, but not incentive salience. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.3758/s13414-021-02426-7. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8747445 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87474452022-01-11 Reward learning and statistical learning independently influence attentional priority of salient distractors in visual search Le Pelley, Mike E. Ung, Rhonda Mine, Chisato Most, Steven B. Watson, Poppy Pearson, Daniel Theeuwes, Jan Atten Percept Psychophys Article Existing research demonstrates different ways in which attentional prioritization of salient nontarget stimuli is shaped by prior experience: Reward learning renders signals of high-value outcomes more likely to capture attention than signals of low-value outcomes, whereas statistical learning can produce attentional suppression of the location in which salient distractor items are likely to appear. The current study combined manipulations of the value and location associated with salient distractors in visual search to investigate whether these different effects of selection history operate independently or interact to determine overall attentional prioritization of salient distractors. In Experiment 1, high-value and low-value distractors most frequently appeared in the same location; in Experiment 2, high-value and low-value distractors typically appeared in distinct locations. In both experiments, effects of distractor value and location were additive, suggesting that attention-promoting effects of value and attention-suppressing effects of statistical location-learning independently modulate overall attentional priority. Our findings are consistent with a view that sees attention as mediated by a common priority map that receives and integrates separate signals relating to physical salience and value, with signal suppression based on statistical learning determined by physical salience, but not incentive salience. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.3758/s13414-021-02426-7. Springer US 2022-01-10 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8747445/ /pubmed/35013993 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13414-021-02426-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Le Pelley, Mike E. Ung, Rhonda Mine, Chisato Most, Steven B. Watson, Poppy Pearson, Daniel Theeuwes, Jan Reward learning and statistical learning independently influence attentional priority of salient distractors in visual search |
title | Reward learning and statistical learning independently influence attentional priority of salient distractors in visual search |
title_full | Reward learning and statistical learning independently influence attentional priority of salient distractors in visual search |
title_fullStr | Reward learning and statistical learning independently influence attentional priority of salient distractors in visual search |
title_full_unstemmed | Reward learning and statistical learning independently influence attentional priority of salient distractors in visual search |
title_short | Reward learning and statistical learning independently influence attentional priority of salient distractors in visual search |
title_sort | reward learning and statistical learning independently influence attentional priority of salient distractors in visual search |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8747445/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35013993 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13414-021-02426-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lepelleymikee rewardlearningandstatisticallearningindependentlyinfluenceattentionalpriorityofsalientdistractorsinvisualsearch AT ungrhonda rewardlearningandstatisticallearningindependentlyinfluenceattentionalpriorityofsalientdistractorsinvisualsearch AT minechisato rewardlearningandstatisticallearningindependentlyinfluenceattentionalpriorityofsalientdistractorsinvisualsearch AT moststevenb rewardlearningandstatisticallearningindependentlyinfluenceattentionalpriorityofsalientdistractorsinvisualsearch AT watsonpoppy rewardlearningandstatisticallearningindependentlyinfluenceattentionalpriorityofsalientdistractorsinvisualsearch AT pearsondaniel rewardlearningandstatisticallearningindependentlyinfluenceattentionalpriorityofsalientdistractorsinvisualsearch AT theeuwesjan rewardlearningandstatisticallearningindependentlyinfluenceattentionalpriorityofsalientdistractorsinvisualsearch |