Cargando…

Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Methods for Predicting Robotized Incremental Metal Sheet Forming Force

This paper proposes a method for extracting information from the parameters of a single point incremental forming (SPIF) process. The measurement of the forming force using this technology helps to avoid failures, identify optimal processes, and to implement routine control. Since forming forces are...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ostasevicius, Vytautas, Paleviciute, Ieva, Paulauskaite-Taraseviciene, Agne, Jurenas, Vytautas, Eidukynas, Darius, Kizauskiene, Laura
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8747513/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35009560
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22010018
_version_ 1784630851283189760
author Ostasevicius, Vytautas
Paleviciute, Ieva
Paulauskaite-Taraseviciene, Agne
Jurenas, Vytautas
Eidukynas, Darius
Kizauskiene, Laura
author_facet Ostasevicius, Vytautas
Paleviciute, Ieva
Paulauskaite-Taraseviciene, Agne
Jurenas, Vytautas
Eidukynas, Darius
Kizauskiene, Laura
author_sort Ostasevicius, Vytautas
collection PubMed
description This paper proposes a method for extracting information from the parameters of a single point incremental forming (SPIF) process. The measurement of the forming force using this technology helps to avoid failures, identify optimal processes, and to implement routine control. Since forming forces are also dependent on the friction between the tool and the sheet metal, an innovative solution has been proposed to actively control the friction forces by modulating the vibrations that replace the environmentally unfriendly lubrication of contact surfaces. This study focuses on the influence of mechanical properties, process parameters and sheet thickness on the maximum forming force. Artificial Neural Network (ANN) and different machine learning (ML) algorithms have been applied to develop an efficient force prediction model. The predicted forces agreed reasonably well with the experimental results. Assuming that the variability of each input function is characterized by a normal distribution, sampling data were generated. The applicability of the models in an industrial environment is due to their relatively high performance and the ability to balance model bias and variance. The results indicate that ANN and Gaussian process regression (GPR) have been identified as the most efficient methods for developing forming force prediction models.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8747513
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87475132022-01-11 Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Methods for Predicting Robotized Incremental Metal Sheet Forming Force Ostasevicius, Vytautas Paleviciute, Ieva Paulauskaite-Taraseviciene, Agne Jurenas, Vytautas Eidukynas, Darius Kizauskiene, Laura Sensors (Basel) Article This paper proposes a method for extracting information from the parameters of a single point incremental forming (SPIF) process. The measurement of the forming force using this technology helps to avoid failures, identify optimal processes, and to implement routine control. Since forming forces are also dependent on the friction between the tool and the sheet metal, an innovative solution has been proposed to actively control the friction forces by modulating the vibrations that replace the environmentally unfriendly lubrication of contact surfaces. This study focuses on the influence of mechanical properties, process parameters and sheet thickness on the maximum forming force. Artificial Neural Network (ANN) and different machine learning (ML) algorithms have been applied to develop an efficient force prediction model. The predicted forces agreed reasonably well with the experimental results. Assuming that the variability of each input function is characterized by a normal distribution, sampling data were generated. The applicability of the models in an industrial environment is due to their relatively high performance and the ability to balance model bias and variance. The results indicate that ANN and Gaussian process regression (GPR) have been identified as the most efficient methods for developing forming force prediction models. MDPI 2021-12-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8747513/ /pubmed/35009560 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22010018 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Ostasevicius, Vytautas
Paleviciute, Ieva
Paulauskaite-Taraseviciene, Agne
Jurenas, Vytautas
Eidukynas, Darius
Kizauskiene, Laura
Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Methods for Predicting Robotized Incremental Metal Sheet Forming Force
title Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Methods for Predicting Robotized Incremental Metal Sheet Forming Force
title_full Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Methods for Predicting Robotized Incremental Metal Sheet Forming Force
title_fullStr Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Methods for Predicting Robotized Incremental Metal Sheet Forming Force
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Methods for Predicting Robotized Incremental Metal Sheet Forming Force
title_short Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Methods for Predicting Robotized Incremental Metal Sheet Forming Force
title_sort comparative analysis of machine learning methods for predicting robotized incremental metal sheet forming force
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8747513/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35009560
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22010018
work_keys_str_mv AT ostaseviciusvytautas comparativeanalysisofmachinelearningmethodsforpredictingrobotizedincrementalmetalsheetformingforce
AT paleviciuteieva comparativeanalysisofmachinelearningmethodsforpredictingrobotizedincrementalmetalsheetformingforce
AT paulauskaitetarasevicieneagne comparativeanalysisofmachinelearningmethodsforpredictingrobotizedincrementalmetalsheetformingforce
AT jurenasvytautas comparativeanalysisofmachinelearningmethodsforpredictingrobotizedincrementalmetalsheetformingforce
AT eidukynasdarius comparativeanalysisofmachinelearningmethodsforpredictingrobotizedincrementalmetalsheetformingforce
AT kizauskienelaura comparativeanalysisofmachinelearningmethodsforpredictingrobotizedincrementalmetalsheetformingforce