Cargando…
Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Methods for Predicting Robotized Incremental Metal Sheet Forming Force
This paper proposes a method for extracting information from the parameters of a single point incremental forming (SPIF) process. The measurement of the forming force using this technology helps to avoid failures, identify optimal processes, and to implement routine control. Since forming forces are...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8747513/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35009560 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22010018 |
_version_ | 1784630851283189760 |
---|---|
author | Ostasevicius, Vytautas Paleviciute, Ieva Paulauskaite-Taraseviciene, Agne Jurenas, Vytautas Eidukynas, Darius Kizauskiene, Laura |
author_facet | Ostasevicius, Vytautas Paleviciute, Ieva Paulauskaite-Taraseviciene, Agne Jurenas, Vytautas Eidukynas, Darius Kizauskiene, Laura |
author_sort | Ostasevicius, Vytautas |
collection | PubMed |
description | This paper proposes a method for extracting information from the parameters of a single point incremental forming (SPIF) process. The measurement of the forming force using this technology helps to avoid failures, identify optimal processes, and to implement routine control. Since forming forces are also dependent on the friction between the tool and the sheet metal, an innovative solution has been proposed to actively control the friction forces by modulating the vibrations that replace the environmentally unfriendly lubrication of contact surfaces. This study focuses on the influence of mechanical properties, process parameters and sheet thickness on the maximum forming force. Artificial Neural Network (ANN) and different machine learning (ML) algorithms have been applied to develop an efficient force prediction model. The predicted forces agreed reasonably well with the experimental results. Assuming that the variability of each input function is characterized by a normal distribution, sampling data were generated. The applicability of the models in an industrial environment is due to their relatively high performance and the ability to balance model bias and variance. The results indicate that ANN and Gaussian process regression (GPR) have been identified as the most efficient methods for developing forming force prediction models. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8747513 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87475132022-01-11 Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Methods for Predicting Robotized Incremental Metal Sheet Forming Force Ostasevicius, Vytautas Paleviciute, Ieva Paulauskaite-Taraseviciene, Agne Jurenas, Vytautas Eidukynas, Darius Kizauskiene, Laura Sensors (Basel) Article This paper proposes a method for extracting information from the parameters of a single point incremental forming (SPIF) process. The measurement of the forming force using this technology helps to avoid failures, identify optimal processes, and to implement routine control. Since forming forces are also dependent on the friction between the tool and the sheet metal, an innovative solution has been proposed to actively control the friction forces by modulating the vibrations that replace the environmentally unfriendly lubrication of contact surfaces. This study focuses on the influence of mechanical properties, process parameters and sheet thickness on the maximum forming force. Artificial Neural Network (ANN) and different machine learning (ML) algorithms have been applied to develop an efficient force prediction model. The predicted forces agreed reasonably well with the experimental results. Assuming that the variability of each input function is characterized by a normal distribution, sampling data were generated. The applicability of the models in an industrial environment is due to their relatively high performance and the ability to balance model bias and variance. The results indicate that ANN and Gaussian process regression (GPR) have been identified as the most efficient methods for developing forming force prediction models. MDPI 2021-12-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8747513/ /pubmed/35009560 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22010018 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Ostasevicius, Vytautas Paleviciute, Ieva Paulauskaite-Taraseviciene, Agne Jurenas, Vytautas Eidukynas, Darius Kizauskiene, Laura Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Methods for Predicting Robotized Incremental Metal Sheet Forming Force |
title | Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Methods for Predicting Robotized Incremental Metal Sheet Forming Force |
title_full | Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Methods for Predicting Robotized Incremental Metal Sheet Forming Force |
title_fullStr | Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Methods for Predicting Robotized Incremental Metal Sheet Forming Force |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Methods for Predicting Robotized Incremental Metal Sheet Forming Force |
title_short | Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Methods for Predicting Robotized Incremental Metal Sheet Forming Force |
title_sort | comparative analysis of machine learning methods for predicting robotized incremental metal sheet forming force |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8747513/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35009560 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22010018 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ostaseviciusvytautas comparativeanalysisofmachinelearningmethodsforpredictingrobotizedincrementalmetalsheetformingforce AT paleviciuteieva comparativeanalysisofmachinelearningmethodsforpredictingrobotizedincrementalmetalsheetformingforce AT paulauskaitetarasevicieneagne comparativeanalysisofmachinelearningmethodsforpredictingrobotizedincrementalmetalsheetformingforce AT jurenasvytautas comparativeanalysisofmachinelearningmethodsforpredictingrobotizedincrementalmetalsheetformingforce AT eidukynasdarius comparativeanalysisofmachinelearningmethodsforpredictingrobotizedincrementalmetalsheetformingforce AT kizauskienelaura comparativeanalysisofmachinelearningmethodsforpredictingrobotizedincrementalmetalsheetformingforce |