Cargando…

The Pretreatment Controlling Nutritional Status Score in Ovarian Cancer: Influence on Prognosis, Surgical Outcome, and Postoperative Complication Rate

Introduction The Controlling Nutritional (CONUT) Status score is an established predictor of impaired prognosis in patients with solid tumors. The aim of this study was to investigate the prognostic value of the CONUT score for overall survival and perioperative complication rates in patients with e...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bekos, Christine, Grimm, Christoph, Gensthaler, Lisa, Bartl, Thomas, Reinthaller, Alexander, Schwameis, Richard, Polterauer, Stephan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2022
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8747899/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35027861
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1608-1309
_version_ 1784630940321972224
author Bekos, Christine
Grimm, Christoph
Gensthaler, Lisa
Bartl, Thomas
Reinthaller, Alexander
Schwameis, Richard
Polterauer, Stephan
author_facet Bekos, Christine
Grimm, Christoph
Gensthaler, Lisa
Bartl, Thomas
Reinthaller, Alexander
Schwameis, Richard
Polterauer, Stephan
author_sort Bekos, Christine
collection PubMed
description Introduction The Controlling Nutritional (CONUT) Status score is an established predictor of impaired prognosis in patients with solid tumors. The aim of this study was to investigate the prognostic value of the CONUT score for overall survival and perioperative complication rates in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer. Patients In this retrospective study we assessed the data of 337 consecutive patients with ovarian cancer. The CONUT score was associated with surgical outcome, postoperative complications and clinicopathological parameters. We used univariate log-rank test and multivariable Cox regression models to evaluate the association between pretreatment CONUT scores and survival. Results A low CONUT score (0 – 2) was associated with an early FIGO stage (p = 0.004), complete tumor resection (p < 0.001), less neoadjuvant chemotherapy (p = 0.017) and other histologies than serous cystadenocarcinoma (p = 0.006). Postoperative complications were observed in 51.4% and 60.5% of patients with a CONUT score of 0 – 2 and a score > 2, respectively (p = 0.161). A shorter overall survival was observed in patients with a CONUT score > 2 compared to patients with a low CONUT score, with 5-year overall survival rates of 31.5% and 58.7%, respectively (p < 0.001). In multivariable analysis, both advanced age (p < 0.001) and FIGO stage (p < 0.001), residual disease (p < 0.001) and a high CONUT score (p = 0.048) were independently associated with unfavorable overall survival. Conclusion Pretreatment CONUT score is an independent prognostic marker for overall survival and associated with successful surgery. Patients with a high CONUT score might benefit from pretreatment nutritional intervention.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8747899
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Georg Thieme Verlag KG
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87478992022-01-12 The Pretreatment Controlling Nutritional Status Score in Ovarian Cancer: Influence on Prognosis, Surgical Outcome, and Postoperative Complication Rate Bekos, Christine Grimm, Christoph Gensthaler, Lisa Bartl, Thomas Reinthaller, Alexander Schwameis, Richard Polterauer, Stephan Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd Introduction The Controlling Nutritional (CONUT) Status score is an established predictor of impaired prognosis in patients with solid tumors. The aim of this study was to investigate the prognostic value of the CONUT score for overall survival and perioperative complication rates in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer. Patients In this retrospective study we assessed the data of 337 consecutive patients with ovarian cancer. The CONUT score was associated with surgical outcome, postoperative complications and clinicopathological parameters. We used univariate log-rank test and multivariable Cox regression models to evaluate the association between pretreatment CONUT scores and survival. Results A low CONUT score (0 – 2) was associated with an early FIGO stage (p = 0.004), complete tumor resection (p < 0.001), less neoadjuvant chemotherapy (p = 0.017) and other histologies than serous cystadenocarcinoma (p = 0.006). Postoperative complications were observed in 51.4% and 60.5% of patients with a CONUT score of 0 – 2 and a score > 2, respectively (p = 0.161). A shorter overall survival was observed in patients with a CONUT score > 2 compared to patients with a low CONUT score, with 5-year overall survival rates of 31.5% and 58.7%, respectively (p < 0.001). In multivariable analysis, both advanced age (p < 0.001) and FIGO stage (p < 0.001), residual disease (p < 0.001) and a high CONUT score (p = 0.048) were independently associated with unfavorable overall survival. Conclusion Pretreatment CONUT score is an independent prognostic marker for overall survival and associated with successful surgery. Patients with a high CONUT score might benefit from pretreatment nutritional intervention. Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2022-01-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8747899/ /pubmed/35027861 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1608-1309 Text en The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commecial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ ) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Bekos, Christine
Grimm, Christoph
Gensthaler, Lisa
Bartl, Thomas
Reinthaller, Alexander
Schwameis, Richard
Polterauer, Stephan
The Pretreatment Controlling Nutritional Status Score in Ovarian Cancer: Influence on Prognosis, Surgical Outcome, and Postoperative Complication Rate
title The Pretreatment Controlling Nutritional Status Score in Ovarian Cancer: Influence on Prognosis, Surgical Outcome, and Postoperative Complication Rate
title_full The Pretreatment Controlling Nutritional Status Score in Ovarian Cancer: Influence on Prognosis, Surgical Outcome, and Postoperative Complication Rate
title_fullStr The Pretreatment Controlling Nutritional Status Score in Ovarian Cancer: Influence on Prognosis, Surgical Outcome, and Postoperative Complication Rate
title_full_unstemmed The Pretreatment Controlling Nutritional Status Score in Ovarian Cancer: Influence on Prognosis, Surgical Outcome, and Postoperative Complication Rate
title_short The Pretreatment Controlling Nutritional Status Score in Ovarian Cancer: Influence on Prognosis, Surgical Outcome, and Postoperative Complication Rate
title_sort pretreatment controlling nutritional status score in ovarian cancer: influence on prognosis, surgical outcome, and postoperative complication rate
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8747899/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35027861
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1608-1309
work_keys_str_mv AT bekoschristine thepretreatmentcontrollingnutritionalstatusscoreinovariancancerinfluenceonprognosissurgicaloutcomeandpostoperativecomplicationrate
AT grimmchristoph thepretreatmentcontrollingnutritionalstatusscoreinovariancancerinfluenceonprognosissurgicaloutcomeandpostoperativecomplicationrate
AT gensthalerlisa thepretreatmentcontrollingnutritionalstatusscoreinovariancancerinfluenceonprognosissurgicaloutcomeandpostoperativecomplicationrate
AT bartlthomas thepretreatmentcontrollingnutritionalstatusscoreinovariancancerinfluenceonprognosissurgicaloutcomeandpostoperativecomplicationrate
AT reinthalleralexander thepretreatmentcontrollingnutritionalstatusscoreinovariancancerinfluenceonprognosissurgicaloutcomeandpostoperativecomplicationrate
AT schwameisrichard thepretreatmentcontrollingnutritionalstatusscoreinovariancancerinfluenceonprognosissurgicaloutcomeandpostoperativecomplicationrate
AT polterauerstephan thepretreatmentcontrollingnutritionalstatusscoreinovariancancerinfluenceonprognosissurgicaloutcomeandpostoperativecomplicationrate
AT bekoschristine pretreatmentcontrollingnutritionalstatusscoreinovariancancerinfluenceonprognosissurgicaloutcomeandpostoperativecomplicationrate
AT grimmchristoph pretreatmentcontrollingnutritionalstatusscoreinovariancancerinfluenceonprognosissurgicaloutcomeandpostoperativecomplicationrate
AT gensthalerlisa pretreatmentcontrollingnutritionalstatusscoreinovariancancerinfluenceonprognosissurgicaloutcomeandpostoperativecomplicationrate
AT bartlthomas pretreatmentcontrollingnutritionalstatusscoreinovariancancerinfluenceonprognosissurgicaloutcomeandpostoperativecomplicationrate
AT reinthalleralexander pretreatmentcontrollingnutritionalstatusscoreinovariancancerinfluenceonprognosissurgicaloutcomeandpostoperativecomplicationrate
AT schwameisrichard pretreatmentcontrollingnutritionalstatusscoreinovariancancerinfluenceonprognosissurgicaloutcomeandpostoperativecomplicationrate
AT polterauerstephan pretreatmentcontrollingnutritionalstatusscoreinovariancancerinfluenceonprognosissurgicaloutcomeandpostoperativecomplicationrate